Reverse Or Nothing For Complex Proximal Humeral Fractures
NCT ID: NCT03610113
Last Updated: 2023-08-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
81 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-30
2023-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, no clinical trials have yet been reported when comparing the conservative treatment to surgical treatment through the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Outcomes of Non-surgical Versus Surgical Treatment of Shoulder Fractures With Different Shoulder Replacements
NCT06444828
Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adults: a Clinical Trial
NCT06360887
Conservative vs Surgical Treatment for Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly
NCT02913378
Comparison Between Anterior Approach (Deltopectoral) and Lateral Approach (Deltoid Splitting) in Shoulder Reverse Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture
NCT03694457
Conservative Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures
NCT03217344
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective To compare the functional results and complications of elderly patients presenting acute complex fractures of the proximal humerus through two types of treatments; conservative treatment and treatment with reverse shoulder prosthesis.
Methodology A prospective, multicentre and randomized study comparing conservative treatment with the surgical treatment at two years followup by the use of functional shoulder assessment (Constant scale), complications and re-interventions associated with each treatment. The quality of life will also be analyzed through the SF-36 health questionnaire
Expected results The null hypothesis of the work is based on the appearance of non-significant differences between the two groups of the study (conservative vs. surgical treatment), concerning functional status, complications, and re-interventions
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT
Conservative treatment is conceived to the use of sling for three weeks, followed by rehabilitation protocol
No interventions assigned to this group
REVERSE ARTHROPLASTY TREATMENT
This group receives a surgical intervention by the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty through deltopectoral approach and tuberosities reattachment.
It is followed by the same rehabilitation protocol than conservative treatment
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
The implantation of reverse shoulder prosthesis, and reattachment of greater and lesser tuberosities
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
The implantation of reverse shoulder prosthesis, and reattachment of greater and lesser tuberosities
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients presenting a 3 or 4 part proximal humeral fracture
Exclusion Criteria
* Cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer test \>3)
* Shoulder dislocations
* Unable to sign informed consent or unable to respond to questionnaires
* Trauma or previous surgery of the extremity
* Open or pathological fracture
* Vascular or neurological injury associated
* Unable to collaborate with rehabilitation
* Patients with serious comorbidities that discourage surgery
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
OTHER
Parc de Salut Mar
OTHER
Consorci Sanitari de l'Anoia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joan Miquel
Orthopaedic Surgeon, Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carlos Torrens, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Parc de Salut Mar
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Joan Miquel Noguera
Collbató, Barcelona, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM, Aluko P, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AC12-045
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.