Reverse Or Nothing For Complex Proximal Humeral Fractures

NCT ID: NCT03610113

Last Updated: 2023-08-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

81 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-30

Study Completion Date

2023-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Reverse shoulder prosthesis has recently emerged as an acute treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures. Promising functional results have been reported in observational papers.

However, no clinical trials have yet been reported when comparing the conservative treatment to surgical treatment through the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction The proximal humeral fractures are frequent in the investigator's environment. Among them, about 20% are considered as complex features. Conservative treatment has traditionally offered an extensive range of results. The reverse shoulder prosthesis as a treatment for acute fractures of the proximal humeral in the elderly population has changed the therapeutic approach of this acute pathology. However, high-level evidence-based studies are still not available, when comparing the conservative treatment with the treatment with reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Objective To compare the functional results and complications of elderly patients presenting acute complex fractures of the proximal humerus through two types of treatments; conservative treatment and treatment with reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Methodology A prospective, multicentre and randomized study comparing conservative treatment with the surgical treatment at two years followup by the use of functional shoulder assessment (Constant scale), complications and re-interventions associated with each treatment. The quality of life will also be analyzed through the SF-36 health questionnaire

Expected results The null hypothesis of the work is based on the appearance of non-significant differences between the two groups of the study (conservative vs. surgical treatment), concerning functional status, complications, and re-interventions

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Humeral Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT

Conservative treatment is conceived to the use of sling for three weeks, followed by rehabilitation protocol

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

REVERSE ARTHROPLASTY TREATMENT

This group receives a surgical intervention by the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty through deltopectoral approach and tuberosities reattachment.

It is followed by the same rehabilitation protocol than conservative treatment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

The implantation of reverse shoulder prosthesis, and reattachment of greater and lesser tuberosities

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty

The implantation of reverse shoulder prosthesis, and reattachment of greater and lesser tuberosities

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Shoulder prosthesis

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with mental conditions available for rehabilitation protocols
* Patients presenting a 3 or 4 part proximal humeral fracture

Exclusion Criteria

* Extremely displaced fractures with no bony contact or less than 1 cm.
* Cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer test \>3)
* Shoulder dislocations
* Unable to sign informed consent or unable to respond to questionnaires
* Trauma or previous surgery of the extremity
* Open or pathological fracture
* Vascular or neurological injury associated
* Unable to collaborate with rehabilitation
* Patients with serious comorbidities that discourage surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Parc de Salut Mar

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Consorci Sanitari de l'Anoia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Joan Miquel

Orthopaedic Surgeon, Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carlos Torrens, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Parc de Salut Mar

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Joan Miquel Noguera

Collbató, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM, Aluko P, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35727196 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AC12-045

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study on Outcomes of Proximal Humerus Fractures
NCT07060664 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA