Utility of an APP for the Monitoring of Irruptive Oncological Pain
NCT ID: NCT03597737
Last Updated: 2021-04-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
21 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-08-10
2020-11-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. usual treatment (waiting list)
2. usual treatment + APP
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intrathecal Analgesia Effects on Cancer Patients Discomfort Symptoms
NCT04491123
A Study to Collect Data About Analgesia in Patients With Bone Metastasis
NCT02774213
Early Treatment With Invasive Technique in Cancer Pain Management
NCT05594459
Epidural Association of Morphine and Ropivacaine for Cancer Pain Treatment
NCT05558397
A Non-interventional, Observational Study for Quality of Life (Overall Health Assessment) in Patients With Chronic Severe Pain During Targinact® Treatment
NCT01710917
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The prevalence of IOP is alarmingly high. A review study of 19 works scientists places the number of cancer patients with IOP in approximately 60%. In addition, the IOP is associated with a significant decrease in the quality of life of the patients. For example, a study conducted in different countries in Europe with 1000 cancer patients revealed that in more than 80% of the participants, the appearance of breakthrough pain completely interrupted their activities. Only 11% of the patients interviewed expressed that the IOP did not interfere in their activities. For the rest of the patients, the most affected areas were sleep and emotional well-being. In addition to these costs in the quality of life of patients with IOP, recent studies have warned of the consequences of this type of pain. Thus, an investigation carried out in the United States evidenced that three quarters of the patients interviewed had experienced important economic losses as a result of the pain, being the average direct costs associated with the IOP of $ 891 per person per month.
Aiming to choose the most appropriate study methodology for this type of pain (often unpredictable and of short duration), the investigators have reviewed the works carried out up to the moment on characteristics and treatment of the IOP. Descriptive studies on IOP tend to use a most retrospective observational methodology, which can lead to biases and inaccuracies. For example, in the most ambitious study carried out so far, 1000 patients with IOP were urged to remember the characteristics of pain episodes, such as the average intensity, the approximate average duration and the average number of events per day.
Regarding the investigations on the effectiveness of the treatment of the IOP, the studies comparing different drugs tend to perform clinical trials, while to study the response to a particular drug, seems more adequate continuous assessment of each patient during an IOP episode. This last methodology with repeated measures seems the most adequate in IOP, since the use of clinical trials with few measures (baseline, post-treatment and follow-up) has the limitation of not allowing daily monitoring of patient's pain episodes.
Although daily assessments seems to be the most suitable design for the monitoring of patients with IOP, the implementation of this type of methodology could be very expensive because requires continuous evaluation. To facilitate this, several studies have already shown that mobile applications (APP) can effectively monitor the evolution of a wide range of pathologies in the context of health. In fact, a controlled clinical study recently made found that the records eco-friendly through mobile APPs were more reliable than registers with pencil and paper.
As for the existing APPs in pain, an exhaustive review of the available APPs revealed that there was little evidence to support the use of these technologies. Specifically, these authors showed that the most APPs did not specify whether their content was validated, APPs did not include psychological components and none had been applied in a clinical study. In the light of these results, the investigators contacted the Labpsitec research team of the University Jaume I, who have developed and validated a pain application called "Pain Monitor".
The APP daily evaluates the variables recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Evaluation of Pain (IMMPACT): intensity of the pain, use of rescue analgesics, pain interference in functioning, state of mood, general perception of health and evaluation of treatment effectiveness. In addition, "Pain Monitor" also assesses psychological factors and behavior that influence the experience of pain: catastrophism, acceptance, fear / avoidance and coping. The APP seems especially indicated for IOP monitoring since, following the recommendations of the guide "Comprehensive approach to the patient with irruptive oncological pain", allows patients access at any time to record the characteristics of pain (place, intensity, duration and characteristics of pain) and frequency of use of medication for the spikes of pain. Finally, the APP allows to create alarms so that, undesirable clinical events (e.g., severe or recurrent adverse effect, increased pain basal, no pain reduction after use of rescue medication, low adherence to treatment), are sent by email to the principal investigator of the study.
Thus, the study objective is to test if the introduction of the Pain Monitor APP in the day-to-day work of the pain unit improves pain management of irruptive oncological pain patients. To do this, it is necessary to compare the evolution of patients who follow the usual treatment at the pain unit (without app) with a group of patients who do use the Pain Monitor APP.
The investigators will perform a clinical trial comparing the 2 conditions mentioned above:
1. usual treatment (waiting list)
2. usual treatment + APP
Therefore, this is a clinical trial without drugs. This is not an observational study since the physicians of patients in the app + alarms condition will be asked to react to an alarm (i.e., if the patient has nausea for 3 consecutive days) by calling the patient and changing the treatment telematically, if necessary, so that the patient can collect the prescription at his primary care center. If the condition APP results in a better treatment of irruptive oncological pain patients, participants of the waiting list will be offered the possibility to use the app at the end of the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment as usual + APP
Participants at this condition will receive the usual medical treatment for their pain but also they will be monitored daily using the Pain Monitor APP. Alarms will be generated in the face of certain preestablished events. Physicians will be asked to call patients and change/stop treatment if an alarm is received.
Pain APP
pain app Pain Monitor app has been developed by a multidisciplinary pain expert panel, including physicians, psychologists, and nurses. Content has been validated in a previous study and usability has been shown to be excellent.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pain APP
pain app Pain Monitor app has been developed by a multidisciplinary pain expert panel, including physicians, psychologists, and nurses. Content has been validated in a previous study and usability has been shown to be excellent.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Irruptive oncological pain
* The patient has a mobile phone with Android operating system
* The patient has the physical ability to use the application
* The patient does not present psychological and / or cognitive alterations or problems with language that make their participation difficult- The patient voluntarily wants to participate and signs the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* The patient does not have a mobile phone or has a mobile phone in which Android is not the operating system (the app is currently only available for Android for economic reasons)
* The patient does not have the physical capacity to use the application
* The patient does not have the capacity to participate due to psychological and / or cognitive alterations or problems with language
* The patient does not want to participate
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitat Jaume I
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Azucena García-Palacios, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Universitat Jaume I
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón
Castellon, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Suso-Ribera C, Castilla D, Zaragoza I, Ribera-Canudas MV, Botella C, Garcia-Palacios A. Validity, Reliability, Feasibility, and Usefulness of Pain Monitor: A Multidimensional Smartphone App for Daily Monitoring of Adults With Heterogenous Chronic Pain. Clin J Pain. 2018 Oct;34(10):900-908. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000618.
Garcia-Palacios A, Herrero R, Belmonte MA, Castilla D, Guixeres J, Molinari G, Banos RM. Ecological momentary assessment for chronic pain in fibromyalgia using a smartphone: a randomized crossover study. Eur J Pain. 2014 Jul;18(6):862-72. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00425.x. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
Olorunto WA, Galandiuk S. Managing the spectrum of surgical pain: acute management of the chronic pain patient. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;202(1):169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.08.007. Epub 2005 Oct 19. No abstract available.
Porta-Sales J, Garzon Rodriguez C, Julia Torras J, Casals Merchan M. [Cancer-related breakthrough pain]. Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Jul 17;135(6):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.02.008. Epub 2010 May 6. No abstract available. Spanish.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OncoApp
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.