Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
51 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-24
2018-08-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis (PNE) in Soleus Injury
NCT04042012
Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Muscle Mass and Strength in Critically Ill Patients After Cardiothoracic Surgery
NCT02391103
Effectiveness of Invasive Electrostimulation Combined With an Exercise Program in Plantar Fasciitis
NCT03020693
Bioimpedance and Sensorimotor Effects of Percutaneous Electrolysis Protocols on the Patellar Tendon
NCT05390359
TENS for Phantom Limb Pain Prevention Following Major Amputation
NCT02496351
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Percutaneous Electrial Stimulation (PES group).
This intervention consisted in the application of an asymmetric biphasic rectangular current. The subject lay prone with her feet outside the table. The FHL muscle was located at 50% of the distance between the fibular head and inferior border of the lateral malleolus on the posterior aspect of the fibular by ultrasound machine (cross-section) (Logiq, GE Healthcare, USA) and then, a needle (0.30mm x 0.40mm) was inserted, perpendicular to the surface of the skin, until the muscle belly. Prior to inserting a neddle, the underlying skin was cleaned with isopropyl alcohol. The intensity of the current was necessary to cause an exacerbated muscle contraction, during 1.5 min acording to the Valera and Minaya protocol“s.
This intervention was performed once in each participant, on one leg only (stance limb), It's only once, it was not a treatment
PENS
This intervention consisted in the application of an asymmetric biphasic rectangular current of 150 microseconds and 10 Hz using a specifically developed medically certified device (Physio Invasive, Enraf Nonius, Prim, SPAIN). This is an invasive intervention by ultrasound and needles.
Transcutaneous Electrial Stimulation (TENS group)
This intervention consisted in the application of an asymmetric biphasic rectangular current. The subject lay prone with her feet outside the table. The FHL muscle was located at 50% of the distance between the fibular head and inferior border of the lateral malleolus on the posterior aspect of the fibular by ultrasound machine (cross-section) (Logiq, GE Healthcare, USA),and then, one self-adhesive electrode was placed on the back of the leg and the other on the sole of the foot. The intensity of the current was necessary to cause an exacerbated muscle contraction, during 1.5 min.
This intervention was performed once in each participant, on one leg only (stance limb), It's only once, it was not a treatment
TENS
This intervention consisted in the application of an asymmetric biphasic rectangular current of 150 microseconds and 10 Hz using a specifically developed medically certified device (Physio Invasive, Enraf Nonius, Prim, SPAIN). This is a non-invasive intervention by self-adhesive electrodes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PENS
This intervention consisted in the application of an asymmetric biphasic rectangular current of 150 microseconds and 10 Hz using a specifically developed medically certified device (Physio Invasive, Enraf Nonius, Prim, SPAIN). This is an invasive intervention by ultrasound and needles.
TENS
This intervention consisted in the application of an asymmetric biphasic rectangular current of 150 microseconds and 10 Hz using a specifically developed medically certified device (Physio Invasive, Enraf Nonius, Prim, SPAIN). This is a non-invasive intervention by self-adhesive electrodes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Training at least twenty-five hours per week
* Pointe training at least five hours per week.
Exclusion Criteria
* Personal Psychological Apprehension Scale (PPAS) score \>37.5
* Commonly accepted contraindications to invasive phsyiotherapist technique
* Any contraindications to needling per se.
* Commonly accepted contraindications to electrotherapy
* Epilepsy.
18 Years
30 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Seville
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Blanca de la Cruz Torres
Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Blanca De la Cruz Torres, Dr
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Seville
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Blanca de La Cruz Torres
Seville, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
de-la-Cruz-Torres B, Barrera-Garcia-Martin I, Romero-Morales C. Comparative Effects of One-Shot Electrical Stimulation on Performance of the Flexor Hallucis Longus Muscle in Professional Dancers: Percutaneous Versus Transcutaneous? Neuromodulation. 2020 Aug;23(6):865-870. doi: 10.1111/ner.13040. Epub 2019 Aug 25.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.