Cost-effectiveness Analysis Between Biosynthetic and Biological Parietal Prostheses

NCT ID: NCT03590184

Last Updated: 2018-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

114 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-01

Study Completion Date

2019-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Eventration corresponds to the dehiscence of the abdominal wall, with passage of peritoneum and / or intra-abdominal viscera, through an acquired orifice of the abdominal wall. It is secondary to an old incision and occurs in 10 to 20% of cases after a laparotomy. At present, if there is no debate on the type of prosthesis to implant in case of clean surgery: it is a synthetic prosthesis. But in the case of contaminated surgery (modified Ventral Hernia Working Group grade 3), there is no consensus.

Since the 1990s, biological prostheses have been recommended, but they represent significant expenses for health facilities. They are very numerous, and their prices vary between 3 000 € and 12 000 €. The choice is therefore difficult for the surgeon.

In 2016 the Strasbourg University Hospital general surgery team made the choice to use biosynthetic prostheses. This attitude does not seem consensual and is not based on any recommendations at present, either in France or internationally. The homogenization of practices requires the availability of clinical and medico-economic data, particularly in view of the price differences that exist between different types of prostheses.

The main objective of this study will be to compare the use of biosynthetic prostheses with biological prostheses in the treatment of curative surgical treatment of mVHWG grade 3 incisional hernias in terms of cost and serious complications at 6 months.

The secondary objective of the study will be to estimate the number of early recurrences at 6 months avoided, thanks to the use of biosynthetic prostheses compared to biological prostheses.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ventral Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

patients with a biological prosthesis

patients who have received a biological prosthesis

No interventions assigned to this group

patients with a biosynthetic resorbable prosthesis

patients who have received a biosynthetic resorbable prosthesis

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* over 18 years old
* Patient who has consented to the use of her medical data for research purposes.
* emergency or planned surgery for an abdominal wall reconstruction, in the context of a contaminated surgery (mVHWG grade 3) at the CHU Strasbourg Hautepierre
* use of biological type (Cellis®, Xenmatrix®, Strattice®) or biosynthetic (Phasix®) parietal prostheses

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal of the patient to participate in the study
* prosthesis placed prophylactically, subcutaneously, endoscopically, for bridge
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service de Chirurgie générale et digestive

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Cécile BRIGAND, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

33 3 88 12 72 26

Diane MULLER

Role: CONTACT

33 3 88 12 72 26

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Cécile BRIGAND, MD, PhD

Role: primary

33 3 88 12 72 26

Diane Muller

Role: backup

33 3 88 12 72 26

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Charleux-Muller D, Romain B, Boisson C, Velten M, Brigand C, Lejeune C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of resorbable biosynthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repair. J Visc Surg. 2022 Aug;159(4):279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34116953 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

7126

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.