Observational Biologic or Prosthetic Mesh

NCT ID: NCT03317665

Last Updated: 2021-10-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-11

Study Completion Date

2021-06-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of hernia recurrence with the use of biologic and prosthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Incisional hernias are very common, leading to over 380,000 operative repairs done annually. Despite the commonality of this problem, there has been no single operative repair that has become the standard. This is due to the high recurrence rates with all types of repairs, especially primary suture repair. Because of this, most repairs are done with some type of mesh, either made out of a prosthetic material or biologic material. Mesh repairs, however, have their own problems, namely surgical site infections and potential bowel erosion. Potential complications associated with prosthetic mesh for hernia repairs include: adverse reactions to the mesh, mesh erosion, stricture formation, adhesions resulting in bowel obstruction, enterocutaneous fistulas, injuries to nearby organs, nerves or blood vessels, infection, chronic pain and hernia recurrence. Potential complications associated with biological mesh include: adverse inflammatory response, laxity, eventration, and recurrent herniation. To address these mesh related complications, the separation of components technique was developed to reduce tension on the midline repair and the underlay technique was developed to place the mesh in the retrorectus space. Nevertheless, this technique still has a significant recurrence rate.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of biological or prosthetic mesh in incisional hernia repair, by assessing the associated rates of hernia recurrence and complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ventral Incisional Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard of care

Mesh for hernia repair: Standard of care products used by the Investigator for open ventral hernia repair procedure

Mesh for hernia repair

Intervention Type DEVICE

Permacol, Parietex, Progrip, Strattice Perforated, and Surgimend.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mesh for hernia repair

Permacol, Parietex, Progrip, Strattice Perforated, and Surgimend.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female patients \> 21 years old.
* Able to provide informed consent in English or Spanish.
* Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant, breastfeeding, or unwilling to practice birth control during participation in the study, if applicable.
* Allergy or hypersensitivity to materials in porcine-based study products, prosthetic or biological meshes, or personal preference.
* Male and female patients ≤ 21 years old
* History of drug addiction (recreational drugs, prescription drugs or alcohol) that in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with protocol assessments and/or the subject's ability to complete the required follow up.
* Serious or active medical or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with treatment, assessment, or compliance with the protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Integra LifeSciences Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of South Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vic Velanovich, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of South Florida

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tampa General Hospital

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of South Florida - South Tampa Campus

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of South Florida Morsani Center for Advanced Health Care

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fekkes JF, Velanovich V. Amelioration of the effects of obesity on short-term postoperative complications of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Apr;25(2):151-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000100.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25222715 (View on PubMed)

Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia. 2012 Apr;16(2):179-83. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21904861 (View on PubMed)

Fischer JP, Wink JD, Tuggle CT, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ. Wound risk assessment in ventral hernia repair: generation and internal validation of a risk stratification system using the ACS-NSQIP. Hernia. 2015 Feb;19(1):103-11. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1318-5. Epub 2014 Dec 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25472771 (View on PubMed)

Zhou XH, Melfi CA, Hui SL. Methods for comparison of cost data. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 15;127(8 Pt 2):752-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00063.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9382393 (View on PubMed)

Holihan JL, Alawadi Z, Martindale RG, Roth JS, Wray CJ, Ko TC, Kao LS, Liang MK. Adverse Events after Ventral Hernia Repair: The Vicious Cycle of Complications. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 May 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26206646 (View on PubMed)

Heniford BT, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Novitsky YW, Hope WW, Kercher KW. Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Apr;206(4):638-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.025. Epub 2008 Feb 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18387468 (View on PubMed)

Nielsen K, Poelman MM, den Bakker FM, van der Ploeg T, Bonjer HJ, Schreurs WH. Comparison of the Dutch and English versions of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a specific quality-of-life questionnaire for abdominal hernia repairs with mesh. Hernia. 2014 Aug;18(4):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1173-9. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24166693 (View on PubMed)

FitzGerald JF, Kumar AS. Biologic versus Synthetic Mesh Reinforcement: What are the Pros and Cons? Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014 Dec;27(4):140-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394155.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26106284 (View on PubMed)

Aravot DJ, Banner NR, Khaghani A, Fitzgerald M, Radley-Smith R, Mitchell AG, Yacoub MH. Cardiac transplantation in the seventh decade of life. Am J Cardiol. 1989 Jan 1;63(1):90-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)91082-5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 2642367 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CA2017-003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mesh Type in Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT03091790 COMPLETED NA