Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
28 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-02-11
2021-06-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Complex Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biologic or Synthetic Mesh
NCT02041494
Gentrix™ Versus Biological or Prosthetic Mesh
NCT03034213
Biologic Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Repair of Ventral Hernias
NCT02451176
Ventral Hernia Study Using OviTex Reinforced Bioscaffold
NCT03074474
Phasix Mesh Use in Complex Open Ventral Hernias Study
NCT04580524
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of biological or prosthetic mesh in incisional hernia repair, by assessing the associated rates of hernia recurrence and complications.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard of care
Mesh for hernia repair: Standard of care products used by the Investigator for open ventral hernia repair procedure
Mesh for hernia repair
Permacol, Parietex, Progrip, Strattice Perforated, and Surgimend.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mesh for hernia repair
Permacol, Parietex, Progrip, Strattice Perforated, and Surgimend.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to provide informed consent in English or Spanish.
* Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Allergy or hypersensitivity to materials in porcine-based study products, prosthetic or biological meshes, or personal preference.
* Male and female patients ≤ 21 years old
* History of drug addiction (recreational drugs, prescription drugs or alcohol) that in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with protocol assessments and/or the subject's ability to complete the required follow up.
* Serious or active medical or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with treatment, assessment, or compliance with the protocol.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Integra LifeSciences Corporation
INDUSTRY
University of South Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vic Velanovich, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of South Florida
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States
University of South Florida - South Tampa Campus
Tampa, Florida, United States
University of South Florida Morsani Center for Advanced Health Care
Tampa, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fekkes JF, Velanovich V. Amelioration of the effects of obesity on short-term postoperative complications of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Apr;25(2):151-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000100.
Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia. 2012 Apr;16(2):179-83. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
Fischer JP, Wink JD, Tuggle CT, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ. Wound risk assessment in ventral hernia repair: generation and internal validation of a risk stratification system using the ACS-NSQIP. Hernia. 2015 Feb;19(1):103-11. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1318-5. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
Zhou XH, Melfi CA, Hui SL. Methods for comparison of cost data. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 15;127(8 Pt 2):752-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00063.
Holihan JL, Alawadi Z, Martindale RG, Roth JS, Wray CJ, Ko TC, Kao LS, Liang MK. Adverse Events after Ventral Hernia Repair: The Vicious Cycle of Complications. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 May 9.
Heniford BT, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Novitsky YW, Hope WW, Kercher KW. Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Apr;206(4):638-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.025. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
Nielsen K, Poelman MM, den Bakker FM, van der Ploeg T, Bonjer HJ, Schreurs WH. Comparison of the Dutch and English versions of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a specific quality-of-life questionnaire for abdominal hernia repairs with mesh. Hernia. 2014 Aug;18(4):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1173-9. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
FitzGerald JF, Kumar AS. Biologic versus Synthetic Mesh Reinforcement: What are the Pros and Cons? Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014 Dec;27(4):140-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394155.
Aravot DJ, Banner NR, Khaghani A, Fitzgerald M, Radley-Smith R, Mitchell AG, Yacoub MH. Cardiac transplantation in the seventh decade of life. Am J Cardiol. 1989 Jan 1;63(1):90-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)91082-5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CA2017-003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.