Pre Bypass Ultrafiltration (PBUF) in Children Requiring Cardiopulmonary Bypass
NCT ID: NCT03576534
Last Updated: 2022-03-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
13 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-03
2021-09-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In order to use the heart-lung machine, the investigators have to use blood and other fluids to fill the tubing. During the operation, ultrafiltration is carried out as standard of care to remove extra fluid. Modified ultrafiltration is also performed after surgery. In this study, the investigators are looking to use the filter additionally before surgery. Using the pre bypass filtration before the subject is placed on the heart-lung machine will allow the investigators to better normalize electrolytes in the blood/fluid mixture used in the heart lung machine. This technique is called pre-bypass ultrafiltration, or PBUF (pronounced "P" Buff).
The investigators are conducting a study to see if using PBUF to better normalize electrolytes in the blood will make a difference. The investigators have been adding fluids to prime the heart-lung machine in two different ways. The investigators believe both methods are safe and acceptable but hypothesize that there may be subtle differences in electrolytes and fluid status when one technique is used as opposed to the other. The investigators believe that neither technique introduces risk since both are currently used in practice. The standard method adds blood to the heart-lung machine. The alternate method adds blood to the heart-lung machine and then additional fluid is added and removed to more normalize the electrolytes. The investigators plan to randomized subjects undergoing heart surgery to receive the standard priming method versus PBUF to determine if there is any difference in outcomes. Laboratory and clinical data collected as part of clinical care will be used to determine difference sin outcomes. There will be no additional blood taken for this study.
There are no known risks to PBUF. The benefits include helping investigators determine if PBUF does or does not make a difference to how subjects recover after surgery. The investigators believe that providing more normal blood values will either improve the subjects' outcome or have no benefit. The investigators do not anticipate increased risks.
Given COVID -19 restrictions, the study is on hold.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Management of Systemic-Pulmonary Collateral Blood Flow in Cyanotic Children During Cardiopulmonary Bypass - Pilot Study
NCT02358382
Surfactant Positive Airway Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Trial
NCT00233324
Surfactant Replacement Guided by Early Lung Ultrasound Score in Preterm Newborns With Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT04775459
Does Modified Ultrafiltration Affect Thromboelastography Results?
NCT03214120
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Surfaktant in Preterm Infants by Lung Ultrasound
NCT03655457
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background: The values for glucose, sodium, potassium and lactate in blood primes for subjects weighing less than 8 kg are known to be non-physiologic. The process of priming the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit is not standardized across institutions and there are several methods used to correct for known prime value issues. The investigators documented the prime values for 20 subjects weighing less than 8 kg and then performed pre-bypass ultrafiltration (PBUF) on the prime for those same circuits to achieve more physiologic prime values. The investigators were cautious not to implement too significant of a change as the investigators assessed the technique and documented that plasma-free hemoglobin importantly did not rise and that measured osmolality was still slightly above the normal range.
Study type: Prospective randomized controlled study.
Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that pre cardiopulmonary bypass ultrafiltration (PBUF) can provide more physiologic prime values for glucose, sodium, potassium and lactate. Plasma-free hemoglobin will not increase with the technique. Osmolality will be maintained slightly above the normal range. PBUF will not negatively impact clinical outcome measures and may improve them.
Specific Aim 1 To determine if use of PBUF will result in more physiologic values for glucose, sodium, potassium and lactate during and immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass.
Specific Aim 2 To determine if PBUF can be achieved with no increase in plasma free hemoglobin while maintaining plasma osmolality within acceptable range during and immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass.
Specific Aim 3 To determine if use of PBUF will result in improved clinical outcomes after surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass.
Randomization: Prior to surgery, subjects will be randomized to one of the two study groups using a randomly permuted blocks design.
Statistical analysis: Analyses will be performed on an intention to treat basis. Comparisons of subject characteristics and outcomes will be made using the two-sample t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables, and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. If imbalances in patient factors exist between the two groups, linear and logistic regression will be used to compare outcomes for the groups adjusting for these potential confounders.
Sample size calculation: Sample size is calculated for comparisons of subjects in the normal range of values for the PBUF and standard care groups. This will be done separately for glucose, sodium, potassium, and lactate; each comparison will be performed at the 0.0125 level of significance. If 70% of standard care subjects are in the normal range versus 90% of PBUF subjects, a total of 176 subjects (88 per group) would be required to achieve 80% power. With 350 eligible subjects that meet inclusion criteria based on 2017 numbers and 75% consent rate the investigators will be able to enroll 260 subjects in 1 year.
Given COVID-19 restrictions, the study is on hold.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
Standard of care
No interventions assigned to this group
Study
PBUF used prior to Cardiopulmonary bypass
Use of prebypass ultrafiltration (PBUF)
In addition to standard of care for cardiopulmonary bypass, in the study arm prebypass ultrafiltration will be performed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Use of prebypass ultrafiltration (PBUF)
In addition to standard of care for cardiopulmonary bypass, in the study arm prebypass ultrafiltration will be performed.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients undergoing transplants as their index surgery
* Patients undergoing Ventricular assist device implantation as their index surgery
1 Day
1 Year
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Boston Children's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Meena Nathan
Staff Surgeon, Department of Cardiac Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Meena Nathan, MD, MPH
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Boston Children's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Moore GL, Peck CC, Sohmer PR, Zuck TF. Some properties of blood stored in anticoagulant CPDA-1 solution. A brief summary. Transfusion. 1981 Mar-Apr;21(2):135-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1981.21281178147.x.
de Vroege R, Wildevuur WR, Muradin JA, Graves D, van Oeveren W. Washing of stored red blood cells by an autotransfusion device before transfusion. Vox Sang. 2007 Feb;92(2):130-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00852.x.
Hall TL, Barnes A, Miller JR, Bethencourt DM, Nestor L. Neonatal mortality following transfusion of red cells with high plasma potassium levels. Transfusion. 1993 Jul;33(7):606-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.33793325059.x.
Baz EM, Kanazi GE, Mahfouz RA, Obeid MY. An unusual case of hyperkalaemia-induced cardiac arrest in a paediatric patient during transfusion of a 'fresh' 6-day-old blood unit. Transfus Med. 2002 Dec;12(6):383-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.2002.00402.x.
O'Leary MF, Szklarski P, Klein TM, Young PP. Hemolysis of red blood cells after cell washing with different automated technologies: clinical implications in a neonatal cardiac surgery population. Transfusion. 2011 May;51(5):955-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02935.x. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
Masalunga C, Cruz M, Porter B, Roseff S, Chui B, Mainali E. Increased hemolysis from saline pre-washing RBCs or centrifugal pumps in neonatal ECMO. J Perinatol. 2007 Jun;27(6):380-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211748. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
Rao R, Georgieff MK. Iron in fetal and neonatal nutrition. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Feb;12(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2006.10.007. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
Mumby S, Chaturvedi RR, Brierley J, Lincoln C, Petros A, Redington AN, Gutteridge JM. Iron overload in paediatrics undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 Mar 17;1500(3):342-8. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4439(00)00003-x.
Jeffers A, Gladwin MT, Kim-Shapiro DB. Computation of plasma hemoglobin nitric oxide scavenging in hemolytic anemias. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006 Nov 15;41(10):1557-65. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.08.017. Epub 2006 Aug 25.
Vercaemst L. Hemolysis in cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: a review in search of a treatment algorithm. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008 Dec;40(4):257-67.
Messent M, Sinclair DG, Quinlan GJ, Mumby SE, Gutteridge JM, Evans TW. Pulmonary vascular permeability after cardiopulmonary bypass and its relationship to oxidative stress. Crit Care Med. 1997 Mar;25(3):425-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199703000-00009.
Hackbarth RM, Eding D, Gianoli Smith C, Koch A, Sanfilippo DJ, Bunchman TE. Zero balance ultrafiltration (Z-BUF) in blood-primed CRRT circuits achieves electrolyte and acid-base homeostasis prior to patient connection. Pediatr Nephrol. 2005 Sep;20(9):1328-33. doi: 10.1007/s00467-005-1970-1. Epub 2005 Jun 10.
Delaney M, Axdorff-Dickey RL, Crockett GI, Falconer AL, Levario MJ, McMullan DM. Risk of extracorporeal life support circuit-related hyperkalemia is reduced by prebypass ultrafiltration. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;14(6):e263-7. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31828a70c5.
Nagashima M, Imai Y, Seo K, Terada M, Aoki M, Shinoka T, Koide M. Effect of hemofiltrated whole blood pump priming on hemodynamics and respiratory function after the arterial switch operation in neonates. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Dec;70(6):1901-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02024-5.
Grist G. Boiling the frog: the dangers of elevated sodium in blood primed pumps for infants. AmSECT Today.2012;Nov/Dec:5.
Matte GS. Perfusion for Congenital Heart Surgery: Notes on Cardiopulmonary Bypass for a Complex Patient Population. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2015. Chapter 2, Page 27-32.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P00028603
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.