Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Patients With Aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT03570892

Last Updated: 2026-01-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

331 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-07

Study Completion Date

2026-02-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized, open label, multicenter phase III trial comparing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tisagenlecleucel to Standard Of Care in adult patients with aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma after failure of rituximab and anthracycline containing frontline immunochemotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Approximately 318 subjects were planned to be randomized; 322 subjects were analyzed (Full analysis set): 162 subjects in the tisagenlecleucel arm and 160 subjects in the SOC arm.

The target population consisted of adult participants with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who were relapsed/refractory within 365 days of their last dose of first line immunochemotherapy and eligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

The duration of treatment in the tisagenlecleucel treatment strategy is from the start of bridging chemotherapy (if applicable) until the infusion of tisagenlecleucel (expected on average at approximately 6 weeks from randomization). The duration of the treatment in the SOC treatment strategy is from the start of salvage chemotherapy until autologous HSCT. In either treatment arm, if infusion of tisagenlecleucel or autologous HSCT is not possible, the duration of treatment is until the last dose of study treatment prior to discontinuation of the treatment strategy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized, Open-Label
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tisagenlecleucel treatment strategy

Patients received investigator's choice of optional platinum-based immunochemotherapy followed by lymphodepleting chemotherapy and a single dose of tisagenlecleucel

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tisagenlecleucel after optional bridging and lymphodepleting chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Investigator's choice of optional platinum-based immunochemotherapy (ie. R-ICE, R-GemOx, R-GDP, R-DHAP) + Lymphodepleting chemotherapy (fludarabine with cyclophosphamide or bendamustine) + Tisagenlecleucel (a second generation CAR-T composed of a CD19 antigen-binding domain, a 4-1BB costimulatory domain and a CD3-ζ signaling domain)

Standard of care treatment strategy

Patients received investigator's choice of platinum-based immunochemotherapy followed in responding patients by high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Platinum-based immunochemotherapy followed in responding patients with high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)

Intervention Type DRUG

Investigator's choice of platinum-based immunochemotherapy (ie. R-ICE, R-GemOx, R-GDP, R-DHAP)+ High dose chemotherapy (ie. BEAM) + autologous HSCT.

\*Ibrutinib or lenalidomide may be used in patients who are no longer eligible for autologous HSCT after 2 cycles of immunochemotherapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tisagenlecleucel after optional bridging and lymphodepleting chemotherapy

Investigator's choice of optional platinum-based immunochemotherapy (ie. R-ICE, R-GemOx, R-GDP, R-DHAP) + Lymphodepleting chemotherapy (fludarabine with cyclophosphamide or bendamustine) + Tisagenlecleucel (a second generation CAR-T composed of a CD19 antigen-binding domain, a 4-1BB costimulatory domain and a CD3-ζ signaling domain)

Intervention Type DRUG

Platinum-based immunochemotherapy followed in responding patients with high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)

Investigator's choice of platinum-based immunochemotherapy (ie. R-ICE, R-GemOx, R-GDP, R-DHAP)+ High dose chemotherapy (ie. BEAM) + autologous HSCT.

\*Ibrutinib or lenalidomide may be used in patients who are no longer eligible for autologous HSCT after 2 cycles of immunochemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically confirmed, aggressive B-cell NHL at relapse/progression or PR after front line therapy. Aggressive B-cell NHL is heretofore defined by the following list of subtypes (Swerdlow et al 2016):

* DLBCL, NOS,
* FL grade 3B,
* Primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma (PMBCL),
* T cell rich/histiocyte rich large B cell lymphoma (T/HRBCL),
* DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation,
* Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma,
* ALK+ large B-cell lymphoma,
* B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, (with features intermediate between DLBCL and classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL)),
* High grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements,
* High-grade B-cell lymphoma, NOS
* HHV8+ DLBCL, NOS
* DLBCL transforming from follicular lymphoma
* DLBCL transforming from marginal zone lymphoma
* DLBCL, leg type
* Relapse or progression within 365 days from last dose of anti CD20 antibody and anthracycline containing first line immunochemotherapy or refractory (have not achieved a CR).
* Patient is considered eligible for autologous HSCT as per local investigator assessment. Note: Intention to transplant and type of high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) regimen will be documented at the time of study entry
* Disease that is both active on PET scan (defined as 5-Deauville scorepoint-scale of 4 or 5) and measurable on CT scan, defined as::

* Nodal lesions \>15 mm in the long axis, regardless of the length of the short axis, and/or
* Extranodal lesions (outside lymph node or nodal mass, but including liver and spleen) \>10 mm in long AND short axis
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
* Adequate organ function:

Renal function defined as:

* Serum creatinine of ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), OR estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2

Hepatic function defined as:

* Alanine Transaminase (ALT) and Aspartate Transiminase (AST) ≤ 5 × ULN
* Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN with the exception of patients with Gilbert syndrome who may be included if their total bilirubin is ≤3.0 × ULN and direct bilirubin ≤1.5 × ULN

Hematologic Function (regardless of transfusions) defined as:

* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>1000/mm3
* Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) \>300/mm3 OR Absolute number of CD3+ T cells \>150/mm3 (only for patients with non-historical apheresis)
* Platelets ≥50000/mm3
* Hemoglobin \>8.0 g/dl

Adequate pulmonary function defined as:

* No or mild dyspnea (≤ Grade 1)
* Oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry \> 90% on room air
* Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ≥ 50% and/or carbon monoxide diffusion test (DLCO) ≥50% of predicted level - Must have a leukapheresis material of non-mobilized cells available for manufacturing.

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior treatment with anti-CD19 therapy, T cell therapy, or any prior gene therapy product
* Treatment with any systemic lymphoma-directed second line anticancer therapy prior to randomization. Only steroids and local irradiation are permitted for disease control
* Patients with active central nervous system (CNS) involvement by disease under study are excluded, except if the CNS involvement has been effectively treated and local treatment was \>4 weeks before randomization
* Prior allogeneic HSCT
* Clinically significant active infection
* Any of the following cardiovascular conditions:

* Unstable angina, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), or stroke within 6 months prior to screening,
* Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) \<45% as determined by echocardiogram (ECHO) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or multigated acquisition (MUGA) at the screening assessment.
* New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV (Chavey et al 2001), within the past 12 months.
* Clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias (e.g., ventricular tachycardia), complete left bundle branch block, high-grade atrioventricular (AV) block (e.g., bifascicular block, Mobitz type II) and third degree AV block unless adequately controlled by pacemaker implantation.
* Resting QTcF ≥450 msec (male) or ≥460 msec (female) at screening or inability to determine the QTcF interval
* Risk factors for Torsades de Pointes (TdP), including uncorrected hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia, history of cardiac failure, or history of clinically significant/ symptomatic bradycardia, or any of the following:
* Long QT syndrome, family history of idiopathic sudden death or congenital long QT syndrome
* Concomitant medication(s) with a "Known Risk of Torsades de Pointes" per crediblemeds.org that cannot be discontinued or replaced by safe alternative medication.
* Patients with active neurological autoimmune or inflammatory disorders (e.g., Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)) and clinically significant active cerebrovascular disorders (e.g. cerebral edema, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES))
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Moores UC San Diego Cancer Center

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

University of California Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UCSF Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Sarah Cannon Research Institute

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Jacksonville

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Booker Dynamic Brand Solutions

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Uni of Chi Medi Ctr Hema and Onco

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Cancer Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wayne State University-Karmanos Cancer Institute

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Uni of Nebraska Med Ctr

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Hackensack Uni Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Jewish Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

The Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health Sciences Univ

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Uni Pennsylvania Abramson Cncr Ctr

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

MUSC Hollings Cancer Center

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Tennessee Oncology PLLC

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

St Davids South Austin Medical Ctr

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology-Baylor Scott and White

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Uni of Texas MD Anderson Ca Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Methodist Hospital

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Uni of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Ctr

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lille, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leipzig, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Milan, MI, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rozzano, MI, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Roma, RM, Italy

Site Status

Kyushu University Hospital

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Hokkaido University Hospital

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Site Status

Tohoku University Hospital

Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Amsterdam UMC, locatie AMC

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

UMC Utrecht Cancer Center

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Brazil China France Germany Hong Kong Italy Japan Netherlands Norway Singapore Spain Switzerland Taiwan United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bishop MR, Dickinson M, Purtill D, Barba P, Santoro A, Hamad N, Kato K, Sureda A, Greil R, Thieblemont C, Morschhauser F, Janz M, Flinn I, Rabitsch W, Kwong YL, Kersten MJ, Minnema MC, Holte H, Chan EHL, Martinez-Lopez J, Muller AMS, Maziarz RT, McGuirk JP, Bachy E, Le Gouill S, Dreyling M, Harigae H, Bond D, Andreadis C, McSweeney P, Kharfan-Dabaja M, Newsome S, Degtyarev E, Awasthi R, Del Corral C, Andreola G, Masood A, Schuster SJ, Jager U, Borchmann P, Westin JR. Second-Line Tisagenlecleucel or Standard Care in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 17;386(7):629-639. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2116596. Epub 2021 Dec 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34904798 (View on PubMed)

Ernst M, Oeser A, Besiroglu B, Caro-Valenzuela J, Abd El Aziz M, Monsef I, Borchmann P, Estcourt LJ, Skoetz N, Goldkuhle M. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for people with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 13;9(9):CD013365. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013365.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34515338 (View on PubMed)

Thiruvengadam SK, Hunter B, Varnavski A, Fakhri B, Kaplan L, Ai WZ, Pampaloni M, Huang CY, Martin T 3rd, Damon L, Andreadis CB. Ofatumumab, Etoposide, and Cytarabine Intensive Mobilization Regimen in Patients with High-risk Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Apr;21(4):246-256.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33288485 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-002966-29

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2023-508343-48-00

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CCTL019H2301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.