Condensed Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) Protocol
NCT ID: NCT03559946
Last Updated: 2023-08-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-08
2020-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation With Solifenacin or Placebo to Treat Refractory Overactive Bladder
NCT01764893
Evaluation of the The Neuromodulation System for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Symptoms
NCT04999657
A Pilot Trial in a Sleep Laboratory Setting to Observe Night Time Bladder Function of Subjects With Overactive Bladder (OAB)
NCT01099345
Darifenacin x Parasacral Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation for OAB in Patients Infected With Human T-Lymphotropic Virus 1
NCT06616675
Peripheral Transcutaneous Neuromodulation of the Post-tibial Nerve for Solifenacin 10 mg. Hyperactive Bladder Syndrome
NCT03468465
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective #1 (6-wk CP vs. 12-wk SP) is to show that 6 weeks of the condensed protocol (CP) will yield a higher efficacy compared to the standard 12-week protocol (SP). If this 6-week CP is proven effective, candidates for PTNS treatment could potentially experience symptom relief in half the time as the current standard of care, improving their quality of life quicker. Objective #2 (12-wk CP vs. 12-wk SP) is to show that 12 weeks of the CP will have a higher efficacy compared to the 12-week SP. If the superiority of this 12-week CP is proven, it could be beneficial in treating patients with refractory OAB.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
All the interventions will be performed by the sub-investigator. The care providing physician will not know the group assignment of the patients.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Protocol (SP) group
The patients in the SP group will receive one PTNS treatment and one sham treatment per week for 12 weeks
percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS)
The PTNS and the sham treatments will be given in 30 min sessions. The PTNS treatment consists of inserting a 34-gauge needle electrode approximately 5 cm cephalad to the medial malleolus and, as well as placing a PTNS surface electrode on the ipsilateral calcaneus. To keep the electrode placement consistent with the sham treatment, 2 inactive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) surface electrodes are also added, 1 placed under the little toe and 1 on the top of the foot. The PTNS lead set is connected to the Urgent PC stimulator, and a current level of 0.5 to 10 mA at 20 Hz is delivered until the flexion of the big toe is observed or the patient reports a radiating sensation at the sole of the foot.
Sham procedure
The sham treatment, involves simulating the sensation of the PTNS needle insertion at the same location using a Steritberger placebo needle. This is a blunt tip needle which simulates the sensation of a needle prick when touched to the skin, however, the blunt tip retracts into the handle when pressed into the skin. This creates the illusion of the needle entering the skin, without breaking the skin's surface. An inactive PTNS surface electrode is also placed on the ipsilateral calcaneus. The two TENS surface electrodes, placed in the same location as the PTNS treatment, are active and deliver stimulation mimicking the sensory effects of the PTNS. However, since no electrode needles were inserted near the tibial nerve, there will be no tibial nerve stimulation
Condensed Protocol (CP) group
The patients in the CP group will receive 2 PTNS treatments per week for 12 weeks.
percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS)
The PTNS and the sham treatments will be given in 30 min sessions. The PTNS treatment consists of inserting a 34-gauge needle electrode approximately 5 cm cephalad to the medial malleolus and, as well as placing a PTNS surface electrode on the ipsilateral calcaneus. To keep the electrode placement consistent with the sham treatment, 2 inactive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) surface electrodes are also added, 1 placed under the little toe and 1 on the top of the foot. The PTNS lead set is connected to the Urgent PC stimulator, and a current level of 0.5 to 10 mA at 20 Hz is delivered until the flexion of the big toe is observed or the patient reports a radiating sensation at the sole of the foot.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS)
The PTNS and the sham treatments will be given in 30 min sessions. The PTNS treatment consists of inserting a 34-gauge needle electrode approximately 5 cm cephalad to the medial malleolus and, as well as placing a PTNS surface electrode on the ipsilateral calcaneus. To keep the electrode placement consistent with the sham treatment, 2 inactive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) surface electrodes are also added, 1 placed under the little toe and 1 on the top of the foot. The PTNS lead set is connected to the Urgent PC stimulator, and a current level of 0.5 to 10 mA at 20 Hz is delivered until the flexion of the big toe is observed or the patient reports a radiating sensation at the sole of the foot.
Sham procedure
The sham treatment, involves simulating the sensation of the PTNS needle insertion at the same location using a Steritberger placebo needle. This is a blunt tip needle which simulates the sensation of a needle prick when touched to the skin, however, the blunt tip retracts into the handle when pressed into the skin. This creates the illusion of the needle entering the skin, without breaking the skin's surface. An inactive PTNS surface electrode is also placed on the ipsilateral calcaneus. The two TENS surface electrodes, placed in the same location as the PTNS treatment, are active and deliver stimulation mimicking the sensory effects of the PTNS. However, since no electrode needles were inserted near the tibial nerve, there will be no tibial nerve stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women or women who are planning to become pregnant during the course of the study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Laborie Medical Technologies Inc.
INDUSTRY
Stony Brook University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jason Kim
Clinical Assistant Professor of Urology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jason Kim, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Stony Brook University Hospital, Department of Urology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stony Brook Medicine Women's Pelvic Health And Continence Center
Stony Brook, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Peters KM, Carrico DJ, Perez-Marrero RA, Khan AU, Wooldridge LS, Davis GL, Macdiarmid SA. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus Sham efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome: results from the SUmiT trial. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.036. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Finazzi-Agro E, Petta F, Sciobica F, Pasqualetti P, Musco S, Bove P. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation effects on detrusor overactivity incontinence are not due to a placebo effect: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2010 Nov;184(5):2001-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.113. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1180838
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.