Are Cognition and Sleep Affected by Exposure to Carbon Dioxide and Bio Effluents During Sleep?

NCT ID: NCT03558698

Last Updated: 2018-10-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-23

Study Completion Date

2018-06-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the project is to examine whether children's sleep and cognition are affected by exposure to CO2 and other bio effluents during sleep. The participants of the study are 36 children recruited from local schools in Aarhus, Denmark.

The study takes place in the climate chambers at the Department of Public Health, Aarhus University. These chambers allow for experimental testing on humans with advanced exposure generation while avoiding contamination from other sources and controlling temperature, humidity, noise, odor, and light.

The children will be sleeping in the chambers under three different conditions:

* One night of good ventilation with a CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3,000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents.

The study is a within-group design, and groups of six children will be sleeping in the chambers for three nights (separated by seven days). The different groups of children are exposed to the conditions in a randomized order. The study is double-blinded (of security reasons the persons responsible for CO2 concentrations in the chambers are not blinded).

The study takes place on schools nights. The children arrive at 6 pm and leave for school the morning after. In the evening the children are tested for approximately 30-40 minutes to measure their cognitive performance using CANTAB (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) on iPads. After completing the test, dinner is served and the children have some spare time before going to bed. During night, the quality of sleep (awake time and different sleep stages) will be monitored using Fitbit devices. Sleep quality will also be evaluated using a short sleep questionnaire. The next morning the cognitive performance of the children will be tested again using CANTAB before the children leave for school.

Our primary hypothesis is that children will perform worse on the cognitive test when exposed to high levels of CO2 and other bio effluents than compared to low levels of CO2 and bio effluents in a well-ventilated room. In addition to that our secondary hypotheses are:

* Children will perform worse on the cognitive test when exposed to high levels of CO2 and other bio effluents than compared to CO2 alone.
* Children will sleep less well in an environment with poor ventilation and high levels of CO2 and other bio effluents compared to sleeping in a well-ventilated room with low levels of CO2.
* Children will sleep less well in an environment with poor ventilation and high levels of CO2 and other bio effluents compared to sleeping in a room with high levels of CO2 alone.
* Children will sleep less well and perform worse on the cognitive test when exposed to high levels of CO2 compared to low levels of CO2.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cognitive Impairment, Mild Sleep Environmental Exposure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

The 36 children are divided into 6 groups of 6 children. Every group is exposed to all possible conditions (3) in a randomized order.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
The study is double-blinded but a few people in the research team are not blinded because of security reasons (they need to be able to control the concentrations of CO2).

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

* One night of good ventilation with a CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents (The order of the three conditions are randomized)

Group Type OTHER

Good ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2

Ventilation CO2

Intervention Type OTHER

CO2 High and Good ventilation

Poor Ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents

Group 2

* One night of good ventilation with a CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents (The order of the three conditions are randomized)

Group Type OTHER

Good ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2

Ventilation CO2

Intervention Type OTHER

CO2 High and Good ventilation

Poor Ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents

Group 3

* One night of good ventilation with High CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents (The order of the three conditions are randomized)

Group Type OTHER

Good ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2

Ventilation CO2

Intervention Type OTHER

CO2 High and Good ventilation

Poor Ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents

Group 4

* One night of good ventilation with a CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents (The order of the three conditions are randomized)

Group Type OTHER

Good ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2

Ventilation CO2

Intervention Type OTHER

CO2 High and Good ventilation

Poor Ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents

Group 5

* One night of good ventilation with a CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents (The order of the three conditions are randomized)

Group Type OTHER

Good ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2

Ventilation CO2

Intervention Type OTHER

CO2 High and Good ventilation

Poor Ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents

Group 6

* One night of good ventilation with a CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents (The order of the three conditions are randomized)

Group Type OTHER

Good ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2

Ventilation CO2

Intervention Type OTHER

CO2 High and Good ventilation

Poor Ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Good ventilation

Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2

Intervention Type OTHER

Ventilation CO2

CO2 High and Good ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Poor Ventilation

Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy children or children with a well-treated chronic disease not interfering with cognition and sleep quality
* Being able to accomplish a CANTAB test
* Completed questionnaires of sleep patterns

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to spend three nights (separated by seven days) in the climate chambers
* Conditions that prevent safe access to the chambers such as claustrophobia
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Torben Sigsgaard

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Public Health - Institute of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Aarhus University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aarhus University, Department of Public Health, Section for Environment, Occupation and Health

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

111017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sleep Deprivation Study
NCT05560620 COMPLETED NA
Mobile Sleep and Growth Study
NCT03263338 COMPLETED NA
Social Experiences and Sleep Study
NCT03937973 COMPLETED NA