Are Cognition and Sleep Affected by Exposure to Carbon Dioxide and Bio Effluents During Sleep?
NCT ID: NCT03558698
Last Updated: 2018-10-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-23
2018-06-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study takes place in the climate chambers at the Department of Public Health, Aarhus University. These chambers allow for experimental testing on humans with advanced exposure generation while avoiding contamination from other sources and controlling temperature, humidity, noise, odor, and light.
The children will be sleeping in the chambers under three different conditions:
* One night of good ventilation with a CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3,000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents.
The study is a within-group design, and groups of six children will be sleeping in the chambers for three nights (separated by seven days). The different groups of children are exposed to the conditions in a randomized order. The study is double-blinded (of security reasons the persons responsible for CO2 concentrations in the chambers are not blinded).
The study takes place on schools nights. The children arrive at 6 pm and leave for school the morning after. In the evening the children are tested for approximately 30-40 minutes to measure their cognitive performance using CANTAB (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) on iPads. After completing the test, dinner is served and the children have some spare time before going to bed. During night, the quality of sleep (awake time and different sleep stages) will be monitored using Fitbit devices. Sleep quality will also be evaluated using a short sleep questionnaire. The next morning the cognitive performance of the children will be tested again using CANTAB before the children leave for school.
Our primary hypothesis is that children will perform worse on the cognitive test when exposed to high levels of CO2 and other bio effluents than compared to low levels of CO2 and bio effluents in a well-ventilated room. In addition to that our secondary hypotheses are:
* Children will perform worse on the cognitive test when exposed to high levels of CO2 and other bio effluents than compared to CO2 alone.
* Children will sleep less well in an environment with poor ventilation and high levels of CO2 and other bio effluents compared to sleeping in a well-ventilated room with low levels of CO2.
* Children will sleep less well in an environment with poor ventilation and high levels of CO2 and other bio effluents compared to sleeping in a room with high levels of CO2 alone.
* Children will sleep less well and perform worse on the cognitive test when exposed to high levels of CO2 compared to low levels of CO2.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Environmental Assessment of Sleep in Youth
NCT03224455
Music for Sleep-onset Insomnia
NCT04585425
The Cognitive and Metabolic Effects of Sleep Restriction in Adolescents
NCT03333512
Sleep and Cardiovascular Health in Adolescence
NCT03727906
Influence of Light on Sleep, Awakening, Electroencephalogram (EEG) and Cognitive Performances
NCT02858765
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
* One night of good ventilation with a CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents (The order of the three conditions are randomized)
Good ventilation
Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2
Ventilation CO2
CO2 High and Good ventilation
Poor Ventilation
Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents
Group 2
* One night of good ventilation with a CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents (The order of the three conditions are randomized)
Good ventilation
Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2
Ventilation CO2
CO2 High and Good ventilation
Poor Ventilation
Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents
Group 3
* One night of good ventilation with High CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents (The order of the three conditions are randomized)
Good ventilation
Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2
Ventilation CO2
CO2 High and Good ventilation
Poor Ventilation
Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents
Group 4
* One night of good ventilation with a CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents (The order of the three conditions are randomized)
Good ventilation
Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2
Ventilation CO2
CO2 High and Good ventilation
Poor Ventilation
Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents
Group 5
* One night of good ventilation with a CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents (The order of the three conditions are randomized)
Good ventilation
Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2
Ventilation CO2
CO2 High and Good ventilation
Poor Ventilation
Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents
Group 6
* One night of good ventilation with a CO2 level of maximum 800 ppm
* One night of good ventilation with high levels of CO2 (3000 ppm)
* One night of poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 (3000 ppm) and other bio effluents (The order of the three conditions are randomized)
Good ventilation
Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2
Ventilation CO2
CO2 High and Good ventilation
Poor Ventilation
Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Good ventilation
Good ventilation with a low concentration of CO2
Ventilation CO2
CO2 High and Good ventilation
Poor Ventilation
Poor ventilation with high concentrations of CO2 and bio effluents
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Being able to accomplish a CANTAB test
* Completed questionnaires of sleep patterns
Exclusion Criteria
* Conditions that prevent safe access to the chambers such as claustrophobia
10 Years
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Torben Sigsgaard
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Public Health - Institute of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Aarhus University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aarhus University, Department of Public Health, Section for Environment, Occupation and Health
Aarhus, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
111017
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.