Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-03
2023-12-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol for Induction of Remission in Patients With Crohn's Disease
NCT00552058
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in the Management of Active Crohn's Disease
NCT02199561
Certolizumab in Crohn's Disease Patients With Loss of Response or Intolerance to Infliximab
NCT00308581
Observational Investigation of the CDED in a Real World IBD Clinic
NCT05554445
Is the Endoscopic Remission Evaluation, Using the CREDO 1 Index / Score in CD Patients in Clinical Remission at Baseline, Predictive of Sustained Clinical Remission Using a 2-year Follow up
NCT03487900
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Follow-up procedures: Capsule endoscopy, nutritional and intestinal US studies will be performed every 6 months for the total study duration of 2 years. For patients with only small bowel disease these will be without preparation. Additionally, periodic (every 3 months) assessment will be performed for inflammatory, microbiome, imaging attributes, quality of life and immunophenotyping, as outlined below in description of tasks for work packages.
3. Risk stratification and outcomes: Based on VCE results and according to the predictive algorithm defined by the first project's results, patients will be classified as high risk if having Lewis score (LS) ≥350 for the small bowel tertile with the highest score, or as having low risk (LS\<350 highest tertile score) for future relapse of disease.
Low risk patients will continue the monitoring scheme and their treatment regimen unaltered. Patients with LS ≥350 will be randomized to either continue follow-up with unaltered therapy or to proactive therapy optimization with TDM assessment. Therapy will be optimized based on the optimization protocol described below, with the aim to prevent flares and complications. Follow up to determine the occurrence of clinical flares and complications as well as the status of inflammatory process will be performed for all patients q3months. Study will be terminated and a patient will be withdrawn upon disease flare or complication or if a change of CD medications was instituted (except for treating verified infectious complication such as C. difficile infection) and such a patient will be considered a non-responder. A patient will also be withdrawn if in the opinion of the Principle Investigator (PI), a new adverse event or medical condition is present that endangers the patient's wellbeing if the study protocol is adhered to. To maintain temporally-restricted blinding, VCE results will be disclosed up to three months following the performance of VCE.
\* In a sub-group of consenting patients, stool samples for microbiome analysis (see below) will be collected daily for a designated period of time. In a sub-group of consenting patients, additional on-line data collection methods will be employed (see below).
Risk-based intervention: Patients meeting the VCE-based high-risk criteria and who were randomized to proactive treatment arm will receive therapy intensification within 30 days. Re-assessment of response to the intensified therapy will be performed by repeated VCE and bio-markers after 6 months. The intensification protocol will be as appears below. Briefly, patients receiving immunomodulators,5-Aminosalicylates (5ASA) or no treatment at the time they are found to have high risk of imminent flare or complication will receive induction with a biologic of the anti-Tumor necrosis Factor (TNF)- Infliximab (IFX), Adalimumab (ADA)- or anti-integrin (VDZ) classes as per standard induction protocols for these agents. The choice of the biologic will be guided by the treating physician's discretion as per the individual patient-related considerations. In patients already on a biologic, intervention will be guided by protocolized TDM results for patients on anti-TNFs, whereas patients receiving vedolizumab will first receive an interval-halving intervention. Protocolized anti-TNF TDM-based intervention will comprise of increasing the dose of anti-TNF, or switching anti-TNF, or switching out-of-class according to the drug/anti-drug antibodies thresholds and algorithms set by previous works by our group in this field, using the same assay that will be employed in the present trial. Re-adjustment of therapy according to these principles will be performed if 6-month VCE re-assessment does not show a reduction of patient risk score to the range of a low risk VCE-based score. Patients who received an intervention and in whom follow-up 6 months VCE does not show a reduction of 225 points on the Lewis score or highest segment Lewis score of \<350, will receive the next protocolized drug optimization.
Intervention protocol in proactive arm based on current treatment and TDM finding:
ADL with drug level\<8mcg/ml/AAA\<4mcg/ml-eq ADL dose-doubling ADL with drug level \<8mcg/ml/AAA\>4mcg/ml-eq Switch anti TNF or add IMM ADL with drug level \>8mcg/ml Switch out of class IFX with drug level \<6mcg/ml/ATI\<9mcg/ml-eq IFX dose-doubling IFX with drug level \<6mcg/ml/ATI\>9mcg/ml-eq Switch anti TNF or add IMM IFX with drug level \>6mcg/ml Switch out of class VDZ e/8 week VDZ interval halving VDZ e4W/CD3CD45RO target occupied \>85% Switch out of class VDZ e4W/ CD3CD45RO target occupied\<85% VDZ double-dosing 600/4w UST 90mg/SC e12w or e/8W Shorten interval e/4w No treatment, 5-ASA or AZA/6MP \>\> Start biologic ADL - adalimumab, IFX- infliximab, VDZ - vedolizumab UST - Ustekinumab AAA- antibodies to adalimumab, ATI antibodies to infliximab, IMM - immunomodulator
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High risk- TDM
Treatment escalation per TDM and physician's decision.
Treatment escalation
Treatment escalation per TDM and physician's decision.
High risk- Follow Up
Patients randomized to this arm will keep with the follow-up regime. Treatment escalation will occur only upon worsening of symptoms.
No interventions assigned to this group
Low risk
Control group. Patients will be assigned to this group based on VCE results and will not undergo randomization.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Treatment escalation
Treatment escalation per TDM and physician's decision.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* CDAI \< 150.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients on a second/third line of biologic class of treatment.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sheba Medical Center
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prof. Shomron BenHorin
Prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Abraham Eliakim, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sheba Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sheba_Medical_Center
Tel Litwinsky, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Margalit Yehuda R, Davidov Y, Selinger L, Ungar B, Lahat A, Yablecovitch D, Neuman S, Kopylov U, Ben Horin S, Eliakim R; Israeli IBD Research Nucleus (IIRN). The Visibility and Performance of Small Bowel Video Capsule Endoscopy With and Without Pre-Procedural Purge Preparation in the Same Patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jun;40(6):1485-1491. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16954. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
Ben-Horin S, Lahat A, Ungar B, Ukashi O, Yablecovitch D, Amitai MM, Haberman Y, Selinger L, Talan-Asher A, Kriger-Sharabi O, Naftali T, Ron Y, Yanai H, Dotan I, Kopylov U, Eliakim R; Israeli IBD Research Nucleus (IIRN). Capsule Endoscopy-Guided Proactive Treat-to-Target Versus Continued Standard Care in Patients With Quiescent Crohn's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gastroenterology. 2025 Jul;169(1):85-93.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.02.031. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4945-18-SMC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.