BiOSS LIM C vs 2nd Generation DES in Non-LM Bifurcations

NCT ID: NCT03548272

Last Updated: 2018-07-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

518 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-12

Study Completion Date

2020-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Coronary bifurcations are encountered in about 15 - 20% of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). They are considered technically challenging and associated with worse clinical outcomes than non-bifurcation lesions. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to the target bifurcation lesion. Randomization (by means envelope randomization) to investigational device: Group 1 for BiOSS LIM C implantation vs Group 2 for any DES implantation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Single stent implantation in the main vessel-main branch across a side branch is the default strategy (provisional T-stenting, PTS) in all patients enrolled. Bifurcation lesions are assessed according to Medina classification using an index of 1 for stenosis greater than 50% and 0 for no stenosis (visual estimation). There is no restriction regarding lesion length in patient selection. If required, additional stent can be implanted (Alex Plus in the BiOSS Lim C Group). A stent in a side branch (Alex Plus in the BiOSS Lim C Group) should be implanted only if there is proximal residual stenosis greater than 70% after balloon dilatation and/or significant flow impairment after main vessel - main branch stenting and/or a flow limiting dissection.

The implantation protocol for bifurcation is as follows:

1. wiring of both branches;
2. main vessel predilatation and/or side branch predilatation according to the operator's decision;
3. stent implantation (inflation for at least 20 s);
4. proximal optimization technique (POT)
5. side branch postdilatation/side branch stent implantation if necessary
6. final kissing balloon inflation at operator's discretion.
7. Second proximal optimization technique (re-POT)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BiOSS LIM C

Intervention: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with BiOSS LIM C stent implantation.

The BiOSS LIM C® is a dedicated bifurcation balloon expandable stent made of cobalt-chromium alloy (strut thickness 70 µm) releasing sirolimus (1.4 µg/mm2) from the surface of a biodegradable coating comprised of a copolymer of lactic and glycolic acids (PGLA). The degradation of the polymer lasts approximately 8 weeks. The BiOSS LIM C® stent consists of two main separate parts with different diameters: wider proximally, and distally smaller. The proximal part is always a bit shorter than the distal one (avg. 1 mm).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with stent implantation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PCI with BiOSS LIM C or rDES depending on the randomization

regular 2nd generation DES

Intervention: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with regular drug-eluting stent implantation (rDES).

rDES well-tested and available on the market. Xience, Orsiro, Resulte Integrity

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with stent implantation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PCI with BiOSS LIM C or rDES depending on the randomization

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with stent implantation

PCI with BiOSS LIM C or rDES depending on the randomization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject at least 18 years of age.
2. Subject able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits of receiving PCI for true bifurcation lesions, and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure.
3. Target main branch lesion(s) located in a native coronary artery with diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.5 mm. Target side branch lesion(s) located in a native coronary artery with diameter of ≥ 2.0 mm.
4. Target lesion(s) amenable for PCI with balloon angioplasty of the side branch.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy \<1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).
2. Subjects who refuse to give informed consent.
3. Subjects with LVEF\<30%
4. Subjects with moderate or severe degree valvular heart disease or primary cardiomyopathy
5. Distal LM stenosis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, Poland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jacek Bil

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Invasive Cardiology Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Robert J Gil, MD, PhD, FESC

Role: primary

+48225081100

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

1. Latib A, Colombo A, Sangiorgi GM. Bifurcation stenting: current strategies and new devices. Heart. 2009; 95(6): 495-504. 2. Lassen JF, Holm NR, Stankovic G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from the first 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2014; 10(5): 545-560. 3. Collet C, Costa RA, Abizaid A. Dedicated bifurcation analysis: dedicated devices. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2011; 27(2): 181-188. 4. Gil RJ, Vassilev D, Michalek A, et al. Dedicated paclitaxel-eluting bifurcation stent BiOSS(R) (bifurcation optimisation stent system): 12-month results from a prospective registry of consecutive all-comers population. EuroIntervention. 2012; 8(3): 316-324. 5. Bil J, Gil RJ, Vassilev D, et al. Dedicated bifurcation paclitaxel-eluting stent BiOSS Expert(R) in the treatment of distal left main stem stenosis. J Interv Cardiol. 2014; 27(3): 242-251. 6. Vassilev D, Gil R, Milewski K. Bifurcation Optimisation Stent System (BiOSS Lim) with sirolimus elution: results from porcine coronary artery model. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2011; 7(5): 614-620. 7. Gil RJ, Bil J, Michalek A, et al. Comparative analysis of lumen enlargement mechanisms achieved with the bifurcation dedicated BiOSS) stent versus classical coronary stent implantations by means of provisional side branch stenting strategy: an intravascular ultrasound study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 29(8): 1667-1676. 8. Gil R, Bil J, Džavík V, et al. Regular drug-eluting stent versus dedicated coronary bifurcation BiOSS Expert® stent - randomized, multicenter, open-label, controlled POLBOS I trial. Can J Cardiol. 2015; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2014.12.024( 9. Gil R, Bil J, Grundeken M, et al. Long-term effectiveness and safety of the sirolimus-eluting BiOSS LIM® dedicated bifurcation stent in the treatment of distal left main stenosis: an international registry. (EuroIntervention - uder review). 2015; 10. Gil RJ, Bil J, Vassiliev D, et al. First-in-man study of dedicated bifurcation sirolimus-eluting stent: 12-month results of BiOSS LIM(R) Registry. J Interv Cardiol. 2015; 28(1): 51-60. 11. Bil J, Gil RJ, Pawlowski T, et al. Assessment of vascular response to BiOSS LIM C(R) stents vs Orsiro(R) stents in the porcine coronary artery model. Cardiovasc Ther. 2017; 12. Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M. [A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions]. Revista espanola de cardiologia. 2006; 59(2): 183. 13. Legutko J, Gil RJ, Buszman P, et al. OCT evaluation of the time course of vessel healing following implantation of new generation biodegradable polymer-coated and sirolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium coronary stent system (ALEX OCT Study). JACC. 2013; 62(18 (S1)): B170-B171. 14. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2012; 126(16): 2020-2035.

Reference Type RESULT

Gil RJ, Kern A, Bojko K, Gziut-Rudkowska A, Vassilev D, Bil J. The Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Controlled POLBOS 3 Trial Comparing Regular Drug-Eluting Stents and the Sirolimus-Eluting BiOSS LIM C Dedicated Coronary Bifurcation Stent: Four-Year Results. Biomedicines. 2024 Apr 23;12(5):938. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12050938.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38790900 (View on PubMed)

Gil RJ, Pawlowski T, Legutko J, Lesiak M, Witkowski A, Gasior M, Kern A, Bil J. Rationale and design of the randomized, multicenter, open-label, controlled POLBOS 3 trial aimed to compare regular drug-eluting stents versus the dedicated coronary bifurcation sirolimus-eluting BiOSS LIM C stent. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(14):e15106. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015106.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30946377 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1.00

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PCI vs. CABG in UPLM-ISR
NCT04968977 COMPLETED
OCT Guided Magmaris RMS in STEMI
NCT03955731 RECRUITING NA
International Bifurcation Study
NCT03450577 RECRUITING