A Neuropsychological Characterization of Social Feedback Processing in Social Anxiety
NCT ID: NCT03547713
Last Updated: 2020-03-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
58 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-02
2018-10-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Behavior Therapy on Responses to Social Stimuli in People With Social Phobia
NCT00380731
Augmentation of Exposure Using Positive Mental Rehearsal in Individuals With Increased Social Anxiety
NCT06564402
Imagery Rescripting and Imaginal Exposure for Social Anxiety: Mechanisms and Outcomes in an Analog Sample
NCT04635904
Effect of Attention Training or SSRIs on Symptoms and Neural Activation in Social Anxiety
NCT03346239
Gaze Contingent Feedback in Social Anxiety Disorder
NCT02590770
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Thus, the overreaching goal of this research is to provide a neuropsychological account of biased processing of social feedback evident in SA. To meet this goal, participants varying in their level of SA are asked to deliver a speech and evaluate it before and after receiving social feedback during an fMRI scan. Additional structural and resting-state fMRI scans, as well as physiological and psychological measures, are obtained throughout the experiment in order to explain individual differences in processing of feedback. fMRI tasks probing basic neuropsychological processes include a self-referential paradigm, wherein participants judge if different traits varying in valence and social domain (power vs. affiliation) are descriptive of them; a reward vs. punishment task, in which participants can win or lose money; and an emotional reactivity task, in which participants view faces with different emotional expressions.
The long-term goal of this study is to better delineate both neurobiological and psychological models of SA, as well as to help in directing future neuromodulation-based treatments of mood and anxiety disorders.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study group
social feedback and neuropsychological assessment
Social feedback
Social feedback regarding performance of a public speech is delivered to participants
Self-referential paradigm
Exposure to traits varying in valence (positive vs. negative) and social domain (power vs. affiliation)
Reward vs. punishment task
Reception of monetary gains vs. losses
Emotional reactivity task
Exposure to emotional faces vs. shapes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Social feedback
Social feedback regarding performance of a public speech is delivered to participants
Self-referential paradigm
Exposure to traits varying in valence (positive vs. negative) and social domain (power vs. affiliation)
Reward vs. punishment task
Reception of monetary gains vs. losses
Emotional reactivity task
Exposure to emotional faces vs. shapes
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* With different levels of social anxiety as measured by the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Self-Report (LSAS-SR; Fresco et al., 2001)
* Normal or corrected-to-normal vision
* Compatibility with general MRI requirements
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Talma Hendler, MD, Phd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tel-Aviv Sourasky medical center
Tel Aviv, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fresco DM, Coles ME, Heimberg RG, Liebowitz MR, Hami S, Stein MB, Goetz D. The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: a comparison of the psychometric properties of self-report and clinician-administered formats. Psychol Med. 2001 Aug;31(6):1025-35. doi: 10.1017/s0033291701004056.
Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):617-27. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617.
Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment, 41(68), 00022-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TASMC-18-TH-0082-17-TLV-CTIL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.