A Neuropsychological Characterization of Social Feedback Processing in Social Anxiety

NCT ID: NCT03547713

Last Updated: 2020-03-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

58 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-02

Study Completion Date

2018-10-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to characterize neuropsychological mechanisms (positive affect, negative affect and self-evaluation) mediating processing of social feedback in people with different levels of social anxiety, by implementing functional and structural MRI.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Social anxiety (SA) disorder is a relatively widespread emotional disorder which is associated with considerable impairment in social, educational, and occupational functioning (Kessler et al., 2005). This condition is characterized by a debilitating preoccupation with the evaluation of the self by others, ultimately leading to excessive fear and avoidance of interpersonal encounters. As opposed to healthy individuals who typically process social feedback in a positively biased manner, Individuals with high levels of SA tend to evaluate the feedback conveyed by others negatively. Such biases have a profound contribution to the maintenance of social-related concerns (Clark \& Wells, 1995).

Thus, the overreaching goal of this research is to provide a neuropsychological account of biased processing of social feedback evident in SA. To meet this goal, participants varying in their level of SA are asked to deliver a speech and evaluate it before and after receiving social feedback during an fMRI scan. Additional structural and resting-state fMRI scans, as well as physiological and psychological measures, are obtained throughout the experiment in order to explain individual differences in processing of feedback. fMRI tasks probing basic neuropsychological processes include a self-referential paradigm, wherein participants judge if different traits varying in valence and social domain (power vs. affiliation) are descriptive of them; a reward vs. punishment task, in which participants can win or lose money; and an emotional reactivity task, in which participants view faces with different emotional expressions.

The long-term goal of this study is to better delineate both neurobiological and psychological models of SA, as well as to help in directing future neuromodulation-based treatments of mood and anxiety disorders.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Social Anxiety

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study group

social feedback and neuropsychological assessment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Social feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Social feedback regarding performance of a public speech is delivered to participants

Self-referential paradigm

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Exposure to traits varying in valence (positive vs. negative) and social domain (power vs. affiliation)

Reward vs. punishment task

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Reception of monetary gains vs. losses

Emotional reactivity task

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Exposure to emotional faces vs. shapes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Social feedback

Social feedback regarding performance of a public speech is delivered to participants

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Self-referential paradigm

Exposure to traits varying in valence (positive vs. negative) and social domain (power vs. affiliation)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Reward vs. punishment task

Reception of monetary gains vs. losses

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Emotional reactivity task

Exposure to emotional faces vs. shapes

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy participants
* With different levels of social anxiety as measured by the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Self-Report (LSAS-SR; Fresco et al., 2001)
* Normal or corrected-to-normal vision
* Compatibility with general MRI requirements

Exclusion Criteria

\- History of neurological or psychiatric diseases
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Talma Hendler, MD, Phd

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tel-Aviv Sourasky medical center

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fresco DM, Coles ME, Heimberg RG, Liebowitz MR, Hami S, Stein MB, Goetz D. The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: a comparison of the psychometric properties of self-report and clinician-administered formats. Psychol Med. 2001 Aug;31(6):1025-35. doi: 10.1017/s0033291701004056.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11513370 (View on PubMed)

Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):617-27. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15939839 (View on PubMed)

Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment, 41(68), 00022-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TASMC-18-TH-0082-17-TLV-CTIL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Social Phobia
NCT00000370 COMPLETED NA
Mechanisms of Panic Disorders Treatment
NCT01323556 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3