Women's Knowledge and Attitudes to Use of Mesh in Gynaecological Surgery
NCT ID: NCT03527082
Last Updated: 2018-05-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-07-31
2019-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, previous studies have included 64 and 77 women respectively.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopic Lateral Mesh Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03387202
Four-arm Mesh for Vaginal Stump Prolapse
NCT03809806
Comparison of Mesh-Based and Mesh-Free Laparoscopic Pectopexy in Uterus-Preserving Surgery for Apical Prolapse
NCT07080957
A Novel Approach to Posterior Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy
NCT04358978
The Follow-up of Mesh/Native Tissue Complications Study(Part I)
NCT03620565
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Since the FDA and NICE publications, there has been much controversy and increasing litigation arising from complications of transvaginal mesh use. Recent negative media attention has likely affected patients' perception regarding mesh use in gynaecology. There are no studies assessing the knowledge and perception of mesh use in gynaecological surgery within the United Kingdom. Previous studies have found patients have limited knowledge and often are misinformed. However, these have been limited to transvaginal meshes. Laparoscopic procedures using mesh for POP such as sacrohysteropexy and sacrocolpopexy are become increasingly popular with comparable outcomes to vaginal surgery. The risk of mesh erosion with laparoscopic surgery is less than vaginal placement.
The use of mesh of gynaecology remains a topical issues and given the amount of information available to patients, this concept merits study, as it may influence patients' decision making and therefore a prominent part of the consent process. The use of mesh in gynaecological surgery remains a highly effective method of treating POP and SUI in appropriately selected patients and routes. It is therefore important to understand patients' understanding and perception regarding mesh use and sources of information in the wake of media coverage and attention. The investigators seek to evaluate patients' knowledge and attitudes towards use of mesh in gynaecological surgery presenting to gynaecology clinics.
The investigators aim to survey 150 women attending gynaecology clinics using a questionnaire. A power calculation has not been performed however, similar studies have included 164 and 77 women respectively. The questionnaire consists of 20 questions that should take 10 minutes to complete.
Consent: A valid consent with detailed written information sheet will be sought before including them in this trial.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria: All women attending the clinic will be eligible to participate if they are over the age of 18, with an understanding of English or translator available and able to provide informed consent.
Risks and benefits: All women will receive the same standard of care regardless if they agree to disagree to participate in the trial. There are no disadvantages associated with participation in taking part in the study.
Data storage: All the information obtained from this study will be stored in a confidential manner and will only be available to the researchers for future analysis.Participants can withdraw their consent at any point and this will not affect the standard of care given to them in future.All the information pertaining to the trial will be destroyed securely.
This research does not involve any use, storage of any tissue
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Women attending gynaecology clinics
150 women attending gynaecology clinics that fulfil inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:
Inclusion criteria
1. Over the age of 18
2. attending gynaecology clinics
3. Able to read and comprehend the details of the study in patient information sheet.
4. Mentally competent at signing the consent form.
5. English -speaking, if not then translator available
Questionnaire
Questionnaire of 20 items evaluating attitudes and perception of mesh use in gynaecological surgery. Questionnaire will take 10 minutes to complete. For non-English speaking patients a translator will be sought, where feasible to help women complete the questionnaire.
Participation will be entirely voluntary and also the questionnaire will be piloted to ensure that questions asked are clear and concise. Questionnaire is anonymised and does not contain patient identifying information thereby eliminating breach of confidentiality.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaire
Questionnaire of 20 items evaluating attitudes and perception of mesh use in gynaecological surgery. Questionnaire will take 10 minutes to complete. For non-English speaking patients a translator will be sought, where feasible to help women complete the questionnaire.
Participation will be entirely voluntary and also the questionnaire will be piloted to ensure that questions asked are clear and concise. Questionnaire is anonymised and does not contain patient identifying information thereby eliminating breach of confidentiality.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
b. Able to read and comprehend the details of the study in patient information sheet.
c. Mentally competent at signing the consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Inability to consent due to a language barrier (no translator available, medication)
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Brown LK, Fenner DE, Berger MB, Delancey JO, Morgan DM, Patel DA, Schimpf MO. Defining patients' knowledge and perceptions of vaginal mesh surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013 Sep-Oct;19(5):282-7. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31829ff765.
Dallenbach P, De Oliveira SS, Marras S, Boulvain M. Incidence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic repair of pelvic organ prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Sep;27(9):1347-55. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-2974-z. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
Dessie SG, Hacker MR, Haviland MJ, Rosenblatt PL. Attitudes toward transvaginal mesh among patients in a urogynecology practice. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jun;26(6):865-73. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2607-3. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
Iglesia CB. Synthetic vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;23(5):362-5. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834a92ab.
Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;(4):CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Transvaginal meshes for anterior and posterior prolapse. 2017
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRAS ID 241922
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.