Clinical Utility of Pediatric Whole Exome Sequencing

NCT ID: NCT03525431

Last Updated: 2023-07-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

529 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-01

Study Completion Date

2022-05-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigator aims to examine the clinical utility of WES, including assessment of a variety of clinical outcomes in undiagnosed pediatric cases.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is changing the paradigm of clinical genetic testing. Unlike highly focused single-gene tests, NGS allows one to examine gene panels, the exome, and the whole genome. With the broad array of molecular tests now available, ordering physicians face the conundrum of selecting the best diagnostic tool for patients with suspected genetic conditions. Single-gene testing is often most appropriate for conditions with distinctive clinical features and minimal locus heterogeneity. NGS-based gene panel testing, which can be complemented with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and other ancillary methods, provides a comprehensive and feasible approach for well documented but genetically heterogeneous disorders. Whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) have the advantage of enabling parallel interrogation of most of the genes in the human genome. To some, WES is preferable to previously used methods due to higher diagnostic yield, shorter time to diagnosis, and improved cost-efficiency.

The ability to survey the exome opens up both new opportunities and new challenges. For example, all coding regions of known genes must be analyzed when applying WES to undiagnosed cases with unclear inheritance patterns. Current limitations on variant interpretation capabilities and clinical validity raise questions about the clinical utility of WES as either a stand-alone or a first-choice diagnostic test. Additional challenges include pre- and post-test counseling with appropriate and robust informed consent, bioinformatics analysis setup and validation, variant interpretation and classification, the need for policies and protocols concerning the discovery and reporting of secondary findings unrelated to the presenting indication, a requirement for validation of WES results, assurance of conformation to quality control standards, data storage and accessibility, and reimbursement issues.

Introducing WES into pediatric clinical care of underrepresented populations raises additional issues and considerations of payment coverage, access, and standards of care. Beyond the sheer complexity of the test and its results, clinicians and health systems must address numerous considerations, including: private and public insurance coverage; language and culture differences and their implications for genetic counseling and clinician-patient relationships; ability to access follow-up testing and clinical care; and ability to access appropriate treatment and services. These issues and others will affect not only patients' decision-making regarding WES, but also their post-test needs for patient follow up. The importance of systematically assessing the clinical utility of NGS is critical for determining in which clinical and health care contexts WES will be useful and for commencing research on these considerations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Encephalopathy Birth Defect Intellectual Disability Multiple Congenital Anomaly Metabolic Disease Epilepsy Neuro-Degenerative Disease Cerebral Palsy Developmental Delay Developmental Defect

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Whole Exome Sequencing

Following consent and collection of standardized phenotypic data, probands and biological parents will undergo WES with variant analysis conducted utilizing primary gene lists based on referring clinical indication. After results provision and follow up 6-12 months later, clinical utility will be assessed in those with a positive result (pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant) and those with negative results (no variant returned or a VUS) using specific outcomes at each site to examine effectiveness for both the child and family.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Whole Exome Sequencing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Whole Exome Sequencing is a form of Next Generation Sequencing allowing investigators to assess the coding regions of many thousands of genes to find variants implicated in disease.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Whole Exome Sequencing

Whole Exome Sequencing is a form of Next Generation Sequencing allowing investigators to assess the coding regions of many thousands of genes to find variants implicated in disease.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Next Generation Sequencing

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Presenting clinical features suggestive of a genetic etiology, including intellectual disability, seizures, multiple congenital anomalies, metabolic conditions, and neurodegenerative conditions or idiopathic cerebral palsy.
2. A minimum of one biological parent is available and willing to provide a specimen for WES, with a preference for two available parents. At least one parent consenting to WES of the child.

4\. Pediatric patients must have had at least one prior genetics appointment or evaluation 5. Pediatric patients may have had a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array or oligonucleotide array that did not provide a diagnosis.

Even though this study is for pediatric patients, maximum age limit was increased to 25, if patients fulfilling the above criteria were being followed by Pediatrics Department since they were younger than 18.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Prior WES performed for a clinical or research indication
2. Lack of phenotypic indication of a likely underlying genetic etiology
3. Both biological parents are unavailable.
Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pui-Yan Kwok, MD/PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Barbara Koenig, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Mary Norton, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCSF Fresno

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Benioff Children's Hospital Mission Bay

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yang Y, Muzny DM, Reid JG, Bainbridge MN, Willis A, Ward PA, Braxton A, Beuten J, Xia F, Niu Z, Hardison M, Person R, Bekheirnia MR, Leduc MS, Kirby A, Pham P, Scull J, Wang M, Ding Y, Plon SE, Lupski JR, Beaudet AL, Gibbs RA, Eng CM. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 17;369(16):1502-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1306555. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24088041 (View on PubMed)

Slavotinek A. Clinical care models in the era of next-generation sequencing. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2016 May 12;4(3):239-42. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.225. eCollection 2016 May. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27247951 (View on PubMed)

Rego S, Hoban H, Outram S, Zamora AN, Chen F, Sahin-Hodoglugil N, Anguiano B, Norstad M, Yip T, Lianoglou B, Sparks TN, Norton ME, Koenig BA, Slavotinek AM, Ackerman SL. Perspectives and preferences regarding genomic secondary findings in underrepresented prenatal and pediatric populations: A mixed-methods approach. Genet Med. 2022 Jun;24(6):1206-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35396980 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U01HG009599

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

1U01HG009599-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Long-term Extension of GTX-102 in Angelman Syndrome
NCT06415344 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE3
AVTX-801 D-galactose Supplementation in SLC35A2-CDG
NCT05402384 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2