Differences in Access to Emergency Paediatric Intensive Care and Care During Transport

NCT ID: NCT03520192

Last Updated: 2022-10-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

2838 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are fewer than 30 paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in the United Kingdom (UK). This means that a critically ill child taken to their nearest hospital will need to be transferred to a PICU. Such transports are usually done by PICU retrieval teams (PICRTs), mobile teams who take specialist expertise to the child and safely transport them to a PICU.

There are national variations in how PICRTs are organised and deliver clinical care. There has been little research into these differences and how they might influence outcomes and experiences for sick children and families. The investigators do not know if national variation in how PICRT services are organised and delivered matters, or whether current standards help achieve the best outcomes for patients. This clinical study aims to understand how existing differences in access to paediatric intensive care and care provided by PICRTs affect clinical outcomes and experiences for transported critically ill children and families. The investigators will analyse routine national audit data to examine various aspects such as how long it takes a PICRT to reach the patient, how long it takes the child to reach the PICU, the seniority of clinicians performing the transport, medical procedures performed by the PICRT and any critical incidents during transport, and investigate whether any of these factors influence how likely a child is to survive. The investigators will also collect and analyse information about the experiences of sick children by interviewing the families involved, and staff experiences of PICU retrieval by interviewing clinicians. Alongside this work, the investigators will look at the costs of different ways of delivering PICRT services for sick children, and use mathematical techniques to study if and how alternate models of service delivery can improve clinical outcomes in a cost effective manner. The research team in this trial includes PICU and transport clinicians, parents, academic experts and an National Health Service (NHS) commissioner.

Independent committees consisting of clinicians and parents will be formed to oversee the study. The work from this study will directly inform the development of evidence-based national standards for PICU transport and help improve the patient experience for critically ill children and their families.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Access and Transport to Paediatric Intensive Care

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children and young people (age \<16 years) transported by a PIC retrieval team for emergency admission to a paediatric intensive care unit in England and Wales.

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ramnarayan P, Evans R, Draper ES, Seaton SE, Wray J, Morris S, Pagel C; DEPICT Study Investigators. Differences in access to Emergency Paediatric Intensive Care and care during Transport (DEPICT): study protocol for a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 16;9(7):e028000. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028000.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31315865 (View on PubMed)

Seaton SE, Ramnarayan P, Pagel C, Davies P, Draper ES; DEPICT Study Team. Impact on 30-day survival of time taken by a critical care transport team to reach the bedside of critically ill children. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Oct;46(10):1953-1955. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06149-5. Epub 2020 Jun 22. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32572530 (View on PubMed)

Seaton SE, Ramnarayan P, Davies P, Hudson E, Morris S, Pagel C, Rajah F, Wray J, Draper ES; DEPICT Study Team. Does time taken by paediatric critical care transport teams to reach the bedside of critically ill children affect survival? A retrospective cohort study from England and Wales. BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02195-6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32560633 (View on PubMed)

Seaton SE, Draper ES, Pagel C, Rajah F, Wray J, Ramnarayan P; DEPICT Study Team. The effect of care provided by paediatric critical care transport teams on mortality of children transported to paediatric intensive care units in England and Wales: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2021 May 3;21(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02689-x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33941116 (View on PubMed)

Evans REC, Barber V, Seaton S, Ramnarayan P, Davies P, Wray J; DEPICT Study Group. Is Parental Presence in the Ambulance Associated With Parental Satisfaction During Emergency Pediatric Intensive Care Retrieval? A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 1;23(9):708-716. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002995. Epub 2022 May 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35969657 (View on PubMed)

Evans REC, Barber V, Seaton S, Draper ES, Rajah F, Pagel C, Polke E, Ramnarayan P, Wray J; DEPICT Study Investigators. Development of a parent experience measure for paediatric critical care transport teams. Nurs Crit Care. 2022 May;27(3):367-374. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12648. Epub 2021 May 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34028143 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15HC47

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The CDR Implementation Trial
NCT03162354 COMPLETED NA
Pediatric Teduglutide Registry
NCT04832087 COMPLETED