Sedation Practices and Preferences of Turkish Intensive Care Physicians: National Survey

NCT ID: NCT03488069

Last Updated: 2018-04-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

429 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-02

Study Completion Date

2017-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sedation is one of the most common practices applied in intensive care units (ICU) and the management of sedation, analgesia and delirium is a quality measure in ICUs. Several intensive care societies published guidelines regarding the use of sedatives and analgesics recently. In literature there are many survey studies investigating practices of sedation in ICUs of different countries, but knowledge of the sedation practices of intensive care physicians in Turkey is lacking. The aim of this study was to provide a baseline knowledge on this matter and to establish some points to be improved. An electronic survey form, consisting of 34 questions was generated with google forms, posted to 1700 email addresses and 429 returned (25%). The survey included questions about demographics and choices and routines of sedation, analgesia, neuromuscular blockers and delirium administration. Ninety-six percent of the respondents indicated that they practiced sedation in their ICUs and mechanical ventilation was checked as the primary indication (94%). On the question regarding drug choices for sedation, midazolam was the most preferred agent (90%). About pain questions, the most used evaluation tool was visual analogue scale (69.0%) and 83% of the respondents preferred to use tramadol for pain, followed by paracetamol (81.6%). Of the participants, 50.5% indicated that they routinely evaluated delirium and 56% of them used confussion assessment method for ICU. The awareness of 2013 American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) guideline for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium was only 38%. The results of this survey have indicated some areas to be improved, such as low incidence of written sedation protocols, frequent use of benzodiazepines, and delirium screening. A national guideline should be prepared taking pain, agitation, and delirium in focus.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This national survey study and questionnaire was approved by the institutional ethics committee of Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical School (approval nr. 261075, date 07.07.2017).

An electronic survey form consisting of 34 questions was generated with google forms (https://docs.google.com/forms) after a literature search with search words "sedation" and "practice" and "survey".

The first part of the form included questions about demographics, intensive care, and hospital characteristics. The second part contained questions on choices and routines of sedation administration, which multiple choices could be indicated.

The questions were first pilot tested for misunderstandings with the ICU physicians in two intensive care units, and the link for the survey was posted to all email addresses registered in the Turkish Society of Intensive Care member database (1700 members) on 2.8.2017. A second notification was sent to same email addresses on 16.10.2017 with a notice of not to reply the survey if it was replied after the first email. Participation in the survey was voluntary and anonymous, and there was no compensation for participation.

Accepting responses to the survey was stopped in 01/11/2017, and answers were downloaded from the web site.

Statistical Analysis The answers were analyzed using Excel spreadsheets (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). The demographic data are expressed as mean (±SD) and counts and percentages. The answers regarding sedation practices are expressed as counts and percentages. No statistical comparisons had been made as this was a descriptive study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness Sedation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Survey

Submission of survey answers

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All physicians accepting to participate the survey

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istanbul University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

seval urkmez

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

seval urkmez, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

IU, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Dept of Intensive Care

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical School

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Urkmez S, Erdogan E, Utku T, Dikmen Y. Sedation Practices and Preferences of Turkish Intensive Care Physicians: A National Survey. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2019 Jun;47(3):220-227. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.49799. Epub 2019 Feb 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31183469 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

261075

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.