Postoperative subQ Pain Control for Spinal Fusion Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03476811

Last Updated: 2022-05-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

11 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-09

Study Completion Date

2021-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Post-operative pain following lumbar spine fusion is frequently difficult to manage and can lead to increased doses of opiate pain medications to control pain. In this study, the use of subcutaneous local anesthesia will be studied to determine its efficacy at reducing post-operative pain following spinal fusion surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For patients randomized to the experimental or to the placebo groups, two subcutaneous catheters will be tunneled under the skin with large hollow-bore needles along the entire length of the incision on either side prior to closure. These catheters will deliver study drug (0.25% Marcaine) directly into the incision. They will be affixed to the skin with steri-strips. The catheters will then be attached to a drug delivery pump at 2mL/hour and will be removed prior to discharge.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spine Fusion Surgery Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This trial is a comparative trial investigating outcomes in 3 parallel groups. The control group will receive standard of care pain control following surgery, the Marcaine group will receive infusion of FDA approved Marcaine around the operative site following surgery through an FDA approved surgical device. The Placebo group will have the drug delivery device implanted with delivery of saline.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Group

Normal treatment paradigm (no anesthetic pump) with pain medications, only.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Marciano Group

Subcutaneous pain control with OnQ pump (0.25% Marcaine at 2ml/hr) and pain medications.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

0.25% Marcaine at 2ml/hr and pain medications

Intervention Type DRUG

Subcutaneous pain control with OnQ Subcutaneous Drug pump

Placebo Group

OnQ pump with placebo (normal saline at 2ml/hr) and pain medications.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placement of OnQ Drug pump

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subcutaneous placement of OnQ drug pump with normal saline infusion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

0.25% Marcaine at 2ml/hr and pain medications

Subcutaneous pain control with OnQ Subcutaneous Drug pump

Intervention Type DRUG

Placement of OnQ Drug pump

Subcutaneous placement of OnQ drug pump with normal saline infusion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

OnQ Subcutaneous Drug pump

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient 18 years of age or greater
* Surgery to be done at Banner University Medical Center-Tucson
* Elective Surgeries only
* Lower Thoracic or Lumbar fusions only - Posterior Approach
* Postero or Posterolateral Instrumented Fusions with or without Interbody graft
* Transforaminal Interbody Fusions
* Must be able to cooperate in the daily VAS assessment

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients under 18 years of age
* Prisoners
* Pregnant women
* Hypersensitivity to infusion medication
* Deformity Correction cases requiring osteotomies
* Surgical fusion in acute phase for traumatic injury
* Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion procedures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Arizona

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Robert Bina

Neurosurgery Resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Arizona

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gottschalk A, Freitag M, Tank S, Burmeister MA, Kreil S, Kothe R, Hansen-Algenstedt N, Weisner L, Staude HJ, Standl T. Quality of postoperative pain using an intraoperatively placed epidural catheter after major lumbar spinal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):175-80. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00027.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15220788 (View on PubMed)

Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology. 2000 Oct;93(4):1123-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200010000-00038. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11020770 (View on PubMed)

Manchikanti L, Singh V, Cash KA, Pampati V, Datta S. Management of pain of post lumbar surgery syndrome: one-year results of a randomized, double-blind, active controlled trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections. Pain Physician. 2010 Nov-Dec;13(6):509-21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21102963 (View on PubMed)

Reynolds RA, Legakis JE, Tweedie J, Chung Y, Ren EJ, Bevier PA, Thomas RL, Thomas ST. Postoperative pain management after spinal fusion surgery: an analysis of the efficacy of continuous infusion of local anesthetics. Global Spine J. 2013 Mar;3(1):7-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1337119. Epub 2013 Mar 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24436846 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1712090332

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
NCT07228039 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4