Postoperative subQ Pain Control for Spinal Fusion Surgery
NCT ID: NCT03476811
Last Updated: 2022-05-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
11 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-02-09
2021-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery
NCT06528288
Erector Spinae Plane Block Analgesia for Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery
NCT04749095
Ultrasound vs. Surgical ESP Block With Bupivacaine-Dexmedetomidine in Lumbar Fusion Surgery
NCT06958718
Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Elective Lumbar Fusion Operations Under General Anesthesia
NCT05338320
Effectiveness of Retrolaminar Block in Lumbar Spine Fusion With Multimodal Analgesia
NCT07291388
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
Normal treatment paradigm (no anesthetic pump) with pain medications, only.
No interventions assigned to this group
Marciano Group
Subcutaneous pain control with OnQ pump (0.25% Marcaine at 2ml/hr) and pain medications.
0.25% Marcaine at 2ml/hr and pain medications
Subcutaneous pain control with OnQ Subcutaneous Drug pump
Placebo Group
OnQ pump with placebo (normal saline at 2ml/hr) and pain medications.
Placement of OnQ Drug pump
Subcutaneous placement of OnQ drug pump with normal saline infusion
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
0.25% Marcaine at 2ml/hr and pain medications
Subcutaneous pain control with OnQ Subcutaneous Drug pump
Placement of OnQ Drug pump
Subcutaneous placement of OnQ drug pump with normal saline infusion
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Surgery to be done at Banner University Medical Center-Tucson
* Elective Surgeries only
* Lower Thoracic or Lumbar fusions only - Posterior Approach
* Postero or Posterolateral Instrumented Fusions with or without Interbody graft
* Transforaminal Interbody Fusions
* Must be able to cooperate in the daily VAS assessment
Exclusion Criteria
* Prisoners
* Pregnant women
* Hypersensitivity to infusion medication
* Deformity Correction cases requiring osteotomies
* Surgical fusion in acute phase for traumatic injury
* Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion procedures
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Arizona
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Robert Bina
Neurosurgery Resident
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gottschalk A, Freitag M, Tank S, Burmeister MA, Kreil S, Kothe R, Hansen-Algenstedt N, Weisner L, Staude HJ, Standl T. Quality of postoperative pain using an intraoperatively placed epidural catheter after major lumbar spinal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):175-80. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00027.
Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology. 2000 Oct;93(4):1123-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200010000-00038. No abstract available.
Manchikanti L, Singh V, Cash KA, Pampati V, Datta S. Management of pain of post lumbar surgery syndrome: one-year results of a randomized, double-blind, active controlled trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections. Pain Physician. 2010 Nov-Dec;13(6):509-21.
Reynolds RA, Legakis JE, Tweedie J, Chung Y, Ren EJ, Bevier PA, Thomas RL, Thomas ST. Postoperative pain management after spinal fusion surgery: an analysis of the efficacy of continuous infusion of local anesthetics. Global Spine J. 2013 Mar;3(1):7-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1337119. Epub 2013 Mar 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1712090332
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.