A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Looped Thread Carpal Tunnel Release
NCT ID: NCT03476486
Last Updated: 2023-05-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-20
2018-01-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation by Clinical and Hand Ultrasound in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT07134361
Short- to Medium-term Outcome of Minimally Invasive Carpal Tunnel Release
NCT06997172
Ultrasound-Guided Curved Needle Thread Carpal Tunnel Release: Efficacy and Safety of a Single-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Trial
NCT06440070
Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Transverse Carpal Ligament Release for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT06251674
Conditioning Electrical Stimulation to Improve Outcomes in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT04191538
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy, having a prevalence of 3.7%. CTS is the 2nd leading worktime loss condition. Open surgical decompression of the carpal tunnel is an evidence-based and commonly performed treatment for moderate to severe cases, predictably providing long-term symptom relief. This surgical technique involves placing a 2-5 cm long longitudinal incision at the palm, incising the skin, subcutaneous tissue, palmar fascia, palmaris longus tendon (if present) and transverse carpal ligament under direct visualization. After 3-8 weeks of recovery, most patients experience excellent relief of symptoms and improvement in hand function. On occasion, the procedure is complicated by nerve damage, scar or pillar pain. A variety of strategies have been devised to minimize the invasive nature of carpal tunnel release in hopes to reduce post procedure pain, weakness and recovery time. In the late 1980s, an endoscopic release technique was devised. A recent meta-analysis of existing randomized control trials comparing open to endoscopic release found endoscopic release to provide better early recovery of grip and pinch strength, less scar tenderness and earlier returned to work (\~9 days). There was a similar risk of pillar pain and reoperation, and a higher risk of nerve injury (mostly transient neurapraxia). The development of high-resolution ultrasound scanning allows detailed visualization of the carpal tunnel and its contents. Hydrodissection, the injection of fluid during ultrasound visualization, adds to image clarity of both the contents of the carpal tunnel as well as the location of operative instruments. A few minimally invasive ultrasound-guided percutaneous carpal tunnel release techniques have been described. The cutting instruments have included needle tip, knife, saws blades, and thread. Initial results of these techniques suggest that they are feasible, safe, effective and are associated with short recovery times. The most recently described minimally invasive technique involves percutaneously looping a cutting thread around the transverse carpal ligament using a needle under ultrasound guidance. By reciprocally sliding the 2 ends of the thread back and forth like a Gigli saw, the transverse carpal ligament is transected. Only 2 needle puncture site are required. The looped thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) procedure was initially performed on a single cadaveric hand and dissection demonstrated complete transection of the transverse carpal ligament and no injury to other structures. The authors then performed the same procedure on 34 hands of 20 patients. The primary outcome measure was the Levine-Katz questionnaire completed 3 months postprocedure. The questionnaire scores were compared to those reported in the literature for open and endoscopic release techniques and were found to be similar. No post TCTR complications were reported. Our research group has recently completed a cadaveric evaluation of this technique and found that ultrasound accurately defines the critical boundries and contents of the carpal tunnel in all cases, complete or near-complete transection of the transverse carpal ligament was achieved and no trauma was sustained by any structure within the carpal tunnel other than the transverse carpal ligament.
Procedure/Methods: subjects with clinical and electrophysiologically confirmed CTS from the practice of the principal investigator will be invited to participate. The 1st phase of this study will involve TCTR of 5 carpal tunnels. Within a month prior to and at 3 and 6 months post procedure the following outcome measures will be collected: subjective measure of symptom and functional limitation severity (Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire); monofilament hand sensibility testing, grip and pinch strength; median nerve cross-sectional area measurement at the carpal tunnel inlet using ultrasound; and electrophysiologic function of the median nerve across the carpal tunnel (motor and sensory conduction velocities and amplitudes). At weekly intervals for the 1st month, each subject will also be contacted to report on their recovery (return to everyday activities including work) and any adverse effects/complications. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire will also be completed at 1 month post TCTR. Assuming no serious complications are encountered from the initial 5 procedures, and upon approval from the supervising Data and Safety Monitoring Board, 15 additional carpal tunnels will undergo TCTR and the same outcome measures will be recorded. The outcome data will be analyzed using a repeated measures Analysis of Variance (Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; monofilament hand sensibility;grip and pinch strength; median nerve cross-sectional area; median nerve motor and sensory conduction velocities and amplitudes) and descriptive statistics (recovery duration and adverse effects/complications).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment
The hand that was subject to thread carpal tunnel release surgery
Thread carpal tunnel release
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous minimally invasive thread carpal tunnel release using a looped thread technique
Control
The hand that was not treated
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Thread carpal tunnel release
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous minimally invasive thread carpal tunnel release using a looped thread technique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* symptoms (hand numbness, tingling, weakness or pain; symptom aggravation with repetitive or sustained gripping; nocturnal symptom exacerbation) and signs (hand sensory disturbance or weakness; positive median nerve Tinel's sign or Phalen's test) compatible with carpal tunnel syndrome
* symptom duration \>3 months refractory to conservative treatment (i.e. wrist splints, activity modification, NSAID, +/- intracarpal tunnel corticosteroid injection)
* nerve conduction study abnormalities compatible with moderate to severe median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel (motor and sensory conduction slowing across the carpal tunnel +/- evidence of axonal loss)
* signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Clinical or electrophysiologic evidence of a neurologic disorder of the upper extremity besides carpal tunnel syndrome (i.e. proximal median neuropathy; ulnar or radial neuropathy, brachial plexopathy, cervical radiculopathy or generalized polyneuropathy)
* Inability to understand the informed consent or the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire
* Coagulopathy or anticoagulation that cannot be stopped for the carpal tunnel release procedure
* Local anesthetic allergy
* systemic infection or a local infection at the procedure site
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alberta
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Burnham
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alberta
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00060817
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.