Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effects of a Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-management Program (NCT NCT03470740)
NCT ID: NCT03470740
Last Updated: 2025-08-22
Results Overview
Disease activity was measured using the DAS-28 (Disease Activity Score-28) which evaluated 28 tender and swollen joint counts of rheumatoid arthritis patients. This scale was used to calculate the 28 tender and swollen joint counts. Scores can range from 0 to 9.4. The lower score represent a better RA outcome.
COMPLETED
NA
224 participants
6 months
2025-08-22
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention Group
An individualized home-based rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for managing RA patients' physical behavioral problems was applied for the intervention group. The program was based on the self-efficacy theory and the four resources were incorporated to emphasize patients' knowledge, skill, and responsibility in managing their RA situations.
rheumatoid arthritis self-management program: The intervention group received the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which was based on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation.
|
Control Group
The control group received general information on rheumatoid arthritis care and follow-up.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
112
|
112
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
108
|
106
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=112 Participants
An individualized home-based rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for managing RA patients' physical behavioral problems was applied for the intervention group. The program was based on the self-efficacy theory and the four resources were incorporated to emphasize patients' knowledge, skill, and responsibility in managing their RA situations.
rheumatoid arthritis self-management program: The intervention group received the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which was based on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation.
|
Control Group
n=112 Participants
The control group received general information on rheumatoid arthritis care and follow-up.
|
Total
n=224 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
58.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29 • n=112 Participants
|
59.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.86 • n=112 Participants
|
58.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.57 • n=224 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
94 Participants
n=112 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=112 Participants
|
192 Participants
n=224 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=112 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=112 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=224 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
|
112 participants
n=112 Participants
|
112 participants
n=112 Participants
|
224 participants
n=224 Participants
|
|
Duration of RA
|
10.21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.09 • n=112 Participants
|
11.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.92 • n=112 Participants
|
10.66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.51 • n=224 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsDisease activity was measured using the DAS-28 (Disease Activity Score-28) which evaluated 28 tender and swollen joint counts of rheumatoid arthritis patients. This scale was used to calculate the 28 tender and swollen joint counts. Scores can range from 0 to 9.4. The lower score represent a better RA outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=112 Participants
An individualized home-based rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for managing RA patients' physical behavioral problems was applied for the intervention group. The program was based on the self-efficacy theory and the four resources were incorporated to emphasize patients' knowledge, skill, and responsibility in managing their RA situations.
rheumatoid arthritis self-management program: The intervention group received the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which was based on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation.
|
Control Group
n=112 Participants
The control group received general information on rheumatoid arthritis care and follow-up.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Disease Activity
|
3.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
3.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsWe used the arthritis self-efficacy-pain (ASE-pain) to measure RA patients' pain self-efficacy. The ASE-pain used visual analogue scales (0-10), in which 0 means 'very uncertain' and 10 means 'very certain'; a higher score refers to higher self-efficacy. This scale have 5 items, therefore, the score range will be 0-50.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=112 Participants
An individualized home-based rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for managing RA patients' physical behavioral problems was applied for the intervention group. The program was based on the self-efficacy theory and the four resources were incorporated to emphasize patients' knowledge, skill, and responsibility in managing their RA situations.
rheumatoid arthritis self-management program: The intervention group received the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which was based on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation.
|
Control Group
n=112 Participants
The control group received general information on rheumatoid arthritis care and follow-up.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Arthritis Self-efficacy- Pain
|
35.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.86
|
32.72 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsWe used the arthritis self-efficacy-other (ASE-OS) to measure RA patients' other symptoms self-efficacy. The ASE-OS used visual analogue scales (0-10), in which 0 means 'very uncertain' and 10 means 'very certain'; a higher score refers to higher self-efficacy. This scale have 6 items, therefore, the score range will be 0-60.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=112 Participants
An individualized home-based rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for managing RA patients' physical behavioral problems was applied for the intervention group. The program was based on the self-efficacy theory and the four resources were incorporated to emphasize patients' knowledge, skill, and responsibility in managing their RA situations.
rheumatoid arthritis self-management program: The intervention group received the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which was based on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation.
|
Control Group
n=112 Participants
The control group received general information on rheumatoid arthritis care and follow-up.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Arthritis Self-efficacy- Other
|
51.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.98
|
48.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsThe Short-form 36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses 8 dimensions of health: physical functioning (PF), social functioning (SF), role limitations because of physical health problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), general mental health (psychological distress and well-being; MH), limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems (RE), vitality (energy and fatigue; VT), and general health perceptions (GH), was used to assess the quality of life in this study. The original scale using the Likert scoring method, the score is from 1-3 or 1-5. Before the scores are added, we follow the SF-36 manual, adjust each item scored from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating extreme problems and 100 indicating no problems. The physical component scores (PCS) included GH, PF, RP, and BP, then the scores of each sub-question under the Physical Component Scores are summed together, and the range after adjustment from 0 (extreme problems) to 400 (no problems) for the Physical Component Scores.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=112 Participants
An individualized home-based rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for managing RA patients' physical behavioral problems was applied for the intervention group. The program was based on the self-efficacy theory and the four resources were incorporated to emphasize patients' knowledge, skill, and responsibility in managing their RA situations.
rheumatoid arthritis self-management program: The intervention group received the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which was based on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation.
|
Control Group
n=112 Participants
The control group received general information on rheumatoid arthritis care and follow-up.
|
|---|---|---|
|
SF-36 Quality of life_Physical Component Scores
|
51.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.72
|
48.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsThe 8-item Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire was used to measure the physical functioning for this study. The MHAQ measures eight activities such as dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach grip, and common daily activities. Items are rated from 1 = without difficulty, to 4 = unable to do; a lower score indicates a greater ability to conduct daily activities. The range of the score will be 8-32.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=112 Participants
An individualized home-based rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for managing RA patients' physical behavioral problems was applied for the intervention group. The program was based on the self-efficacy theory and the four resources were incorporated to emphasize patients' knowledge, skill, and responsibility in managing their RA situations.
rheumatoid arthritis self-management program: The intervention group received the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which was based on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation.
|
Control Group
n=112 Participants
The control group received general information on rheumatoid arthritis care and follow-up.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Physical Functioning
|
23.72 score on a scale
Standard Error 7.30
|
26.14 score on a scale
Standard Error 10.64
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsTo assess self-management behaviors the researchers developed a joint activity and protection self-management behaviors scale. The scale consists of eight items and ranges from zero for 'never' to four for 'always'. Higher scores indicate a higher level of use of each of the self-management behavior. The range of the score will be 0-32.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=112 Participants
An individualized home-based rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for managing RA patients' physical behavioral problems was applied for the intervention group. The program was based on the self-efficacy theory and the four resources were incorporated to emphasize patients' knowledge, skill, and responsibility in managing their RA situations.
rheumatoid arthritis self-management program: The intervention group received the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which was based on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation.
|
Control Group
n=112 Participants
The control group received general information on rheumatoid arthritis care and follow-up.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Self-management Behaviors
|
16.69 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.80
|
16.24 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 MonthsThe Short-form 36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses 8 dimensions of health: physical functioning (PF), social functioning (SF), role limitations because of physical health problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), general mental health (psychological distress and well-being; MH), limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems (RE), vitality (energy and fatigue; VT), and general health perceptions (GH), was used to assess the quality of life in this study. The original scale using the Likert scoring method, the score is from 1-3 or 1-5. Before the scores are added, we follow the SF-36 manual, adjust each item scored from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating extreme problems and 100 indicating no problems. The mental component scores (MCS) included RE, SF, VT, and MH, then the scores of each sub-question under the Mental Component Scores are summed together, and the range after adjustment from 0 (extreme problems) to 400 (no problems) for the Mental Component Scores.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=112 Participants
An individualized home-based rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for managing RA patients' physical behavioral problems was applied for the intervention group. The program was based on the self-efficacy theory and the four resources were incorporated to emphasize patients' knowledge, skill, and responsibility in managing their RA situations.
rheumatoid arthritis self-management program: The intervention group received the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which was based on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation.
|
Control Group
n=112 Participants
The control group received general information on rheumatoid arthritis care and follow-up.
|
|---|---|---|
|
SF-36 Quality of Life_Mental Component Scores (MCS)
|
50.98 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.36
|
48.97 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.67
|
Adverse Events
Intervention Group
Control Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Su-Hui Chen
Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place