A Multi-site Comparison of Social Visual Engagement to Clinical Diagnosis for Autism Spectrum Disorder
NCT ID: NCT03469986
Last Updated: 2023-11-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
505 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-04-07
2019-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Consecutive pediatric patients from the intended population (i.e. children 16-30 months of age) recruited from pediatric referrals and general advertisements will be the subjects of this trial. All subjects will undergo the MAC-ID diagnostic procedure (test). All subjects will also undergo the current best practice clinical diagnostic procedure, using standardized ASD diagnostic instruments and standardized developmental assessments, to produce the ECD of each child's ASD status (reference/gold standard).
The study consists of a screening phase and diagnostic evaluation phase to assess the validity (sensitivity and specificity), safety, and effectiveness of the MAC-ID when used to diagnose ASD.
Subjects will be enrolled in the trial for a period of 1 day. The trial will be completed in approximately 12 months.
The overall study objective is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the MAC-ID to accurately diagnose ASD (primary analysis), as well as to accurately assess severity of ASD (secondary analysis) in very young pediatric subjects.
The primary endpoints of this study are the diagnostic result from the MAC-ID and the diagnostic results from the ECD evaluation, both of which are either positive or negative for ASD. Each subject will undergo the Social Developmental Testing Device procedure and an examination by a clinical expert in the field of ASD diagnosis; all study center site personnel (including the expert clinicians responsible for the ECD evaluation) will be blinded to MAC-ID results.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dynamic Quantification of Social-Visual Engagement in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
NCT05806216
Treatment Monitoring in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in Children
NCT05675371
Screening for Autism in 9-Month-Olds by Measuring Social Visual Engagement
NCT05916430
A Center Based Study of Pivotal Response Treatment for Preschoolers With Autism
NCT03778827
Trial of Center-Based vs. In-Home Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) in Autism
NCT04899544
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Children who meet criteria based on expert clinical diagnosis for autism spectrum disorder will be tested with the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device and expert clinical assessment.
Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device
This trial will ascertain whether the binary results of autism or not-autism as determined by the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device match expert clinical diagnostic opinion. The investigational device is designed to measure visual attention to social information in the environment relative to normative, age-specific benchmarks; these measurements assess presence (primary efficacy outcome) and severity (secondary outcomes) of autism spectrum disorder in 16- to 30-month-old children.
Non-autism Spectrum Disorder
Children who do not meet criteria for autism spectrum disorder based on expert clinical diagnosis will be tested with the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device and expert clinical assessment.
Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device
This trial will ascertain whether the binary results of autism or not-autism as determined by the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device match expert clinical diagnostic opinion. The investigational device is designed to measure visual attention to social information in the environment relative to normative, age-specific benchmarks; these measurements assess presence (primary efficacy outcome) and severity (secondary outcomes) of autism spectrum disorder in 16- to 30-month-old children.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device
This trial will ascertain whether the binary results of autism or not-autism as determined by the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device match expert clinical diagnostic opinion. The investigational device is designed to measure visual attention to social information in the environment relative to normative, age-specific benchmarks; these measurements assess presence (primary efficacy outcome) and severity (secondary outcomes) of autism spectrum disorder in 16- to 30-month-old children.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Generally healthy with no acute illnesses by physical examination
3. Normal or corrected-to-normal vision, in terms of visual acuity and oculomotor function, sufficient to watch short videos. Adequate hearing to hear material presented in videos
4. Subject and parent can communicate meaningfully in English with the principal investigator and the clinical study site staff
5. Subject's parent or guardian is able to read and understand the informed consent form
6. Parent voluntarily provides written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Severe hearing or visual impairment as determined on physical examination (e.g., congenital nystagmus, congenital cataracts, previous diagnosis of severe hearing deficits by otoacoustic emissions or auditory brainstem response)
3. Acute illnesses likely to prevent successful or valid data collection, i.e., conjunctivitis, fever, uncontrolled allergy symptoms, etc.
4. Uncontrolled epilepsy or seizure disorder
5. History or presence of a clinically significant medical disease, or a mental state that might confound the study or be detrimental to the subject as determined by the investigator
6. Acute exacerbations of chronic illnesses likely to prevent successful or valid data collection
7. Receiving therapies that may affect vision, i.e., currently receiving or have received the following therapies within 2 weeks of screening: topiramate, chlorpromazine, thioridazine, prednisone, prednisolone (including ophthalmic solutions and ointments), diphenhydramine, or hydroxyzine; or have received ophthalmic antibiotics within 3 days of screening: tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and ofloxacin solutions and/or bacitracin ointment
8. Receiving therapies that may affect the ability to focus attention on the videos, i.e., if on central nervous system (CNS) stimulants, CNS depressants, or anticonvulsants, dose must be stable (same dose for at least 2 weeks).
9. Known allergies or sensitivity to the plastic, leather, or metal components used in the materials of the Social Developmental Testing Device seat
10. Unable or unwilling to sit in a car seat, e.g., child has tantrums on nearly all occasions when placed in a car seat and tantrums do not subside within 5 minutes
16 Months
30 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
EarliTec Diagnostics, Inc
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cheryl Klaiman, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Southwest Autism Research and Resource Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Seattle Children's Hospital
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jones W, Klaiman C, Richardson S, Lambha M, Reid M, Hamner T, Beacham C, Lewis P, Paredes J, Edwards L, Marrus N, Constantino JN, Shultz S, Klin A. Development and Replication of Objective Measurements of Social Visual Engagement to Aid in Early Diagnosis and Assessment of Autism. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2330145. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30145.
Jones W, Klaiman C, Richardson S, Aoki C, Smith C, Minjarez M, Bernier R, Pedapati E, Bishop S, Ence W, Wainer A, Moriuchi J, Tay SW, Klin A. Eye-Tracking-Based Measurement of Social Visual Engagement Compared With Expert Clinical Diagnosis of Autism. JAMA. 2023 Sep 5;330(9):854-865. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13295.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
EarliPoint Evaluation for Autism Spectrum Disorder
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
S-DTD-2014-301
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.