Clinical Trial Comparing Two Bladder Instillations for IC/BPS
NCT ID: NCT03463915
Last Updated: 2021-09-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-25
2020-10-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bladder Instillations Versus Onabotulinumtoxin A for Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome
NCT04401176
Pain Type and Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Treatment
NCT06299683
Bladder Directed vs. Pelvic Floor Therapy in IC/BPS
NCT02870738
A Randomized Study Comparing Placebo and ASP3652 in the Treatment of Women With Bladder Pain Syndrome / Interstitial Cystitis (BPS/IC)
NCT01613586
Amniotic Membrane Therapy for Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome
NCT06096597
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To evaluate the utility of a steroid in the bladder instillation treatment of IC/BPS, we propose a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial that will compare the efficacy of bladder instillations with and without triamcinolone acetonide on IC/BPS symptoms in women. We hypothesize that the addition of triamcinolone acetonide in bladder instillation therapy will result in a more robust treatment response than bladder instillations without triamcinolone acetonide. Our rationale is based on 1) the results of small studies that showed improvement of IC/BPS symptoms with use of a steroid and 2) the hypothesized mechanism of action of steroids decreasing inflammation in the bladder.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bladder instillation WITH triamcinolone acetonide
Six weekly bladder instillations of standard cocktail plus triamcinolone acetonide. Standard cocktail= heparin (10,000 units), 2% viscous lidocaine (10 mL), 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (15 mL of 1 mEq/mL), and 0.5% bupivacaine (10 mL of 5 mg/mL) plus triamcinolone acetonide (1 vial, 40 milligrams (mg)/1 milliliters (mL).
Bladder instillation WITH triamcinolone acetonide
Bladder instillation mixture of heparin (10,000 units), 2% viscous lidocaine (10 mL), 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (15 mL of 1 mEq/mL), 0.5% bupivacaine (10 mL of 5 mg/mL) plus triamcinolone acetonide (1 vial, 40 milligrams (mg)/1 milliliters (mL).
Bladder instillation WITHOUT triamcinolone acetonide
Six weekly bladder instillations of standard cocktail without triamcinolone acetonide. Standard cocktail= heparin (10,000 units), 2% viscous lidocaine (10 mL), 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (15 mL of 1 mEq/mL), and 0.5% bupivacaine (10 mL of 5 mg/mL).
Bladder instillation WITHOUT triamcinolone acetonide
Bladder instillation mixture of heparin (10,000 units), 2% viscous lidocaine (10 mL), 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (15 mL of 1 mEq/mL), and 0.5% bupivacaine (10 mL of 5 mg/mL).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bladder instillation WITH triamcinolone acetonide
Bladder instillation mixture of heparin (10,000 units), 2% viscous lidocaine (10 mL), 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (15 mL of 1 mEq/mL), 0.5% bupivacaine (10 mL of 5 mg/mL) plus triamcinolone acetonide (1 vial, 40 milligrams (mg)/1 milliliters (mL).
Bladder instillation WITHOUT triamcinolone acetonide
Bladder instillation mixture of heparin (10,000 units), 2% viscous lidocaine (10 mL), 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (15 mL of 1 mEq/mL), and 0.5% bupivacaine (10 mL of 5 mg/mL).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women with IC/BPS who have a score of ≥ 6 on either index (problem or symptom index) of the O'Leary-Sant questionnaire who have selected bladder instillations as part of their IC/BPS treatment
* Suitability for follow-up
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura
* Does not desire to undergo bladder instillation therapy or unwilling to undergo bladder instillation therapy on schedule mandated by study
* Have a known alternative diagnosis explaining bladder pain symptoms that would preclude the diagnosis of IC/BPS (e.g. radiation cystitis, active urinary tract infection with bacteria or fungus treated within last 2 weeks or diagnosed at index visit, bladder injury or trauma within the last 30 days)
* Inability to speak or read English
* Bladder instillation within the past 4 weeks
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Olivia Cardenas-Trowers, M.D.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Olivia Cardenas-Trowers, M.D.
Sponsor-Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Olivia Cardenas-Trowers, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Louisville
Sean Francis, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Louisville
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Louisville Urogynecology at Springs Medical Center
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Clemens JQ, Meenan RT, Rosetti MC, Gao SY, Calhoun EA. Prevalence and incidence of interstitial cystitis in a managed care population. J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):98-102; discussion 102. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000146114.53828.82.
Nickel JC. Interstitial cystitis: a chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Med Clin North Am. 2004 Mar;88(2):467-81, xii. doi: 10.1016/S0025-7125(03)00151-2.
Aaron LA, Buchwald D. A review of the evidence for overlap among unexplained clinical conditions. Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):868-81. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-9_part_2-200105011-00011.
Alagiri M, Chottiner S, Ratner V, Slade D, Hanno PM. Interstitial cystitis: unexplained associations with other chronic disease and pain syndromes. Urology. 1997 May;49(5A Suppl):52-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80332-x.
Bullones Rodriguez MA, Afari N, Buchwald DS; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Working Group on Urological Chronic Pelvic Pain. Evidence for overlap between urological and nonurological unexplained clinical conditions. J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1 Suppl):S66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.019.
Clauw DJ, Schmidt M, Radulovic D, Singer A, Katz P, Bresette J. The relationship between fibromyalgia and interstitial cystitis. J Psychiatr Res. 1997 Jan-Feb;31(1):125-31. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(96)00051-9.
Dawson TE, Jamison J. Intravesical treatments for painful bladder syndrome/ interstitial cystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD006113. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006113.pub2.
Pazin C, de Souza Mitidieri AM, Silva AP, Gurian MB, Poli-Neto OB, Rosa-E-Silva JC. Treatment of bladder pain syndrome and interstitial cystitis: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 May;27(5):697-708. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2815-5. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
Chaparro LE, Wiffen PJ, Moore RA, Gilron I. Combination pharmacotherapy for the treatment of neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD008943. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008943.pub2.
Cvach K, Rosamilia A. Review of intravesical therapies for bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis. Transl Androl Urol. 2015 Dec;4(6):629-37. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.10.07.
Barua JM, Arance I, Angulo JC, Riedl CR. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of intravesical therapy for bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Aug;27(8):1137-47. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2890-7. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
Soucy F, Gregoire M. Efficacy of prednisone for severe refractory ulcerative interstitial cystitis. J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):841-3; discussion 843. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000153612.14639.19.
Cox M, Klutke JJ, Klutke CG. Assessment of patient outcomes following submucosal injection of triamcinolone for treatment of Hunner's ulcer subtype interstitial cystitis. Can J Urol. 2009 Apr;16(2):4536-40.
Cardenas-Trowers OO, Abraham AG, Dotson TK, Houlette BA, Gaskins JT, Francis SL. Bladder Instillations With Triamcinolone Acetonide for Interstitial Cystitis-Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May 1;137(5):810-819. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004348.
Imamura M, Scott NW, Wallace SA, Ogah JA, Ford AA, Dubos YA, Brazzelli M. Interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 30;7(7):CD013325. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013325.pub2.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18.0209
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.