Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-11-01
2018-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Examination of the Value of Shortwave Diathermy and Hydrotherapy for Patients With Osteoarthritis of Their Knees
NCT00726492
Pain Sensitization and Outcome Following Physiotherapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT02310945
Feasibility of Pain Informed Movement for Knee OA
NCT04954586
3-point vs 6-point GNRFA for Chronic KOA
NCT05930756
Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning on Conditioned Pain Modulation and Heart Rate Variability in Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT05059652
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It applies intense heat to points of maximum pain agreed with the patient pre procedure. The heat is applied by a metal rod (Shalaka) heated in an open naked flame. The rod is applied to the skin at the agreed pain point in an even manner and generates a micro second degree burn. A traditional herbal cream is then applied which cools the application as reported by the patient. It is usual to allow skin healing to occur before the application of further heat (1-2 weeks). The pain points can move within a painful area and the technique best works with precise application to the current pain point. So before each application the precise points are agreed with the patient in advance by demarcating the painful area with a pen and searching for the points of maximum tenderness within that field.
The purpose of this study was simply to define if indeed this technique delivers pain relief as observed in practice. The investigators chose one group to study - painful knee arthritis. In this condition patients often wait many years for the definitive procedure and run some risks with current pain relief treatment. As these patients were not the normal attendees at a pain clinic the investigators decided in advance to limit the study to 4 applications over a 4- 8 week period, the latter to allow for different speeds at which the skin might heal. The investigators recruited both our interventional group and waiting list control group from the same orthopedic waiting list.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group: PNFS-TMC
Procedure- The patients in the intervention group were examined and the most painful points over the knee with the avoidance of the proposed site for skin incision for a future knee replacement operation were marked. The marked points received an intervention in the form of application of Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation by Thermal Micro-Cautery (PNFS-TMC), an intense heat by metal rod was applied to the painful points for 0.3 to 0.5 seconds. The patients to receive 4 sessions over a period of 8 weeks with 2 weeks rest after every session.
Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation by Thermal Micro-Cautery
The most painful points over the knee received an intense heat by a metal rod for 0.5 seconds.
Control group: Stepladder analgesics
Patients with painful knee osteoarthritis and on the waiting list for a total knee replacement surgery and declined to have PNFS-TMC were included in the control group. The control group received the stepladder analgesic protocol for pain management. The analgesic protocol was managed by the orthopaedic team without any interference by the investigators.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation by Thermal Micro-Cautery
The most painful points over the knee received an intense heat by a metal rod for 0.5 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The National Children's Hospital, Tallaght
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Camillus Power
Director of Pain Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
camillus power, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tallaght University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tallaght University Hospital
Dublin, , Ireland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-10 Chairman's Action (3)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.