Soft Peri-implant Tissue Around Different Abutment Materials

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-06

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Soft tissue attachment to the implant surface serves as a biological seal preventing the development of inflammatory periimplant diseases (i.e. peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis).It occurs in the presence of a biomaterial during healing of the surgical wound that might be influence by this foreign body. Myofibroblasts represent key players in the physiological reconstruction of connective tissue after injury.

This work will focus on the role of myofibroblasts during the early phases of the healing process in peri-implant tissues around four different abutment materials.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Peri-implant Marginal Bone and Soft Tissue Conditions Around Single Laser-Lok Implants Placed in Regenerated Extraction Sockets and in Native Bone: A 2-years Results of RCT

NCT03686865

Partially Edentulous Maxilla, Partially Edentulous Mandible

COMPLETED

Laterally Rotated Flap for Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Maxillary Loaded Osseointegrated Dental Implant

NCT06206499

Implant Tissue Failure Dental Implant Failed Peri-Implantitis

RECRUITING NA

Histological Analysis of Peri-implant Soft Tissue

NCT06862505

Implant Therapy Biological Width

COMPLETED PHASE4

Surface Decontamination in Treatment of Peri-Implantitis

NCT03114956

Peri-implantitis

WITHDRAWN NA

Influence of Keratinized Mucosa on Dental Implants With Mucositis

NCT04874467

Peri-Implantitis Peri-implant Mucositis Compliance, Patient

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dental implants are anchored in jawbone through a direct bonding between bone and the implant. Success and survival of an implant do, however, not depend solely on osseointegration. A soft tissue, which surrounds the transmucosal part of a dental implant, separates the peri-implant bone from the oral cavity. This soft tissue collar is called "peri-implant mucosa". The soft tissue attachment to the implant surface serves as a biological seal that prevents the development of inflammatory peri-implant diseases (i.e. peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis) Thus, the soft tissue seal around implants ensures healthy conditions and stable osseointegration and therefore also the long-term survival of an implant. While the soft tissue seal around teeth develops during tooth eruption, the peri-implant mucosa forms after the the surgical wound created to insert the implant. The wound healing phase may occur following the closure of a mucoperiosteal flap around the neck portion of an implant placed in a so-called one-stage procedure or after a second surgical intervention for abutment connections to an already installed dental implant (two-stage procedure).

It seems that the soft tissue adhesion is influenced by the properties (abutment material and micro-topography) of the implant components that are placed in contact with the soft tissues. Abutment material was found to influence bleeding on probing (BoP) at peri-implant soft tissues, as well.

Since wound healing occurs in the presence of a biomaterial (i.e. a foreign body) at a critical region, positive or negative interferences of wound healing events with this biomaterial and adaptation of the soft tissue to this biomaterial have to be taken into consideration. Biocompatibility, soft tissue adhesion, plaque retention, mechanical behavior and esthetics are listed among the criteria of material abutment selection. Titanium remains the most reliable material given its mechanical resistance, biocompatibility, modification of surface increasing cell adhesion and plaque retention. However, in the case of increased esthetics demands, particularly for thin biotype, zirconia and ceramics aluminum abutments give better results with comparable technical and biological outcomes to titanium abutments.

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a strong thermoplastic material produced from polyetheretherketone resin. Because of its high mechanical strength and durability, good electrical characteristics and outstanding resistance to hydrolysis, PEEK has been used extensively in aerospace, automotive, chemical, electronics, petroleum, and food and beverage industries. Recently, a medical-grade PEEK was developed. Medical-grade PEEK has the same physical properties as PEEK; however, PEEK-OPTIMA™ is also biocompatible, has high chemical resistance and resists several different sterilization methods. It is noteworthy to mention that PEEK has an elastic modulus similar to that of the bone preventing marginal bone loss in case of occlusal overload. Due to the aforementioned properties, PEEK has been used as abutment material.

Morphology of the abutment deserves considerations, as well. Some physiological soft-tissue recession can be seen in time around implant restorations when a divergent emergence profile (the most common) is chosen next to the soft tissue. Recently it has been shown how some gingival coronal migration can be seen with the use of tapered emergence profile abutments. In fact, by using these tapered abutments or an implant design with a tapered shape at the neck implant level (transmucosal level), not only soft tissue migration but also hard tissue migration could be achieved over time.

Healing of peri-implant mucosa is characterized by a rapid formation of vascular structures and recruitment of inflammatory cells followed by the maturation of a tissue that eventually establishes a firm barrier of supracrestal connective tissue and long junctional epithelium, which effectively prevents downgrowth of a bacterial biofilm. Angiogenesis as a critical part of wound healing is noticed to peak at 2 weeks with a decline over 10 weeks, while the recruitment of inflammatory cells (B cells and T cells) occur in clusters and decrease from 4 to 8 weeks of healing in connective tissue.

However, little is available on the very early response that might determine the histological organization of peri-implant soft tissues in general and in contact to different macroscopic and microscopically modified materials. Peri-implant soft tissues are part of the gingiva and oral mucosa and implant placement occurs through the creation of an wound. Myofibroblasts represent key players in the physiological reconstruction of connective tissue after injury and in generating the pathological tissue deformations that characterize fibrosis. They constitute a critical cellular source of type I collagen, which is essential during wound healing. Excessive contraction and overproduction of extracellular matrix, mainly collagen, by myofibroblasts can cause tissue fibrosis with formation of hypertrophic scar characterized by reducedtensile strength and disoriented collagen fibres. In full thickness skin wounds, myofibroblast differentiation starts approximately a week after wounding, and contraction peaks at 5-15 days postwounding, but in oral cavity, this step occurs earlier than in skin, given the shorter healing time of these tissues.

Therefore the aim of the present study was to evaluate the myofibroblast component of peri-implant mucosal tissues at different healing abutment materials (titanium gr4, titanium gr 5, zirconium and PEEK) 24 hours after placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Ethical aspect This protocol will be evaluated by the Ethical Committee of Sapienza University of Rome after Department approval. Each patient will be provided with a written informed consent.

Study design Biomolecular study of biopsies taken from the peri-implant soft tissue 24 hours after implant and healing abutment placement of four different materials (titanium gr4, titanium gr 5, zirconium and PEEK).

Operators, blindness and allocation Implants and abutments will be placed by a single operator, not involved in other functions during the study. A second operator, not involved in implant or abutment placement, will perform the biopsy. The laboratory operator will be blind of the allocation of biopsies. The type of abutment associated with each implant will be determined in a closed envelope that is going to be opened only when implant is placed. Patients will be informed about the type of implants and abutments used but not about the exact location of each one.

Sample characteristics A total of 10 patients recruited for implant treatment at the Dental clinic of Sapienza University of Rome will participate in the study following the fulfilment of the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria:

(I) Age ≥ 18 years (II) Absence of Systemic Diseases / Disorders (III) Smoking ≤ 5 cigarettes per day (IV) Periodontally healthy or treated (V) Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) ≤ 15% at baseline (VI) Full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) ≤ 15% at baseline (VII) Presence of edentulous space needing an all on four or all on six treatment with overdenture (VIII) Width of the keratinized gingiva ≥ 2 at the level of the crest

Exclusion criteria: (exclusion of risk / confounding factors):

(I) Pregnancy / lactation (II) Use of systemic antibiotics in the last 3 months (III) Use of systemic antibiotics as prophylaxis for endocarditis (IV) A chronically treated patient (i.e. 2 weeks or longer) with medicines known to affect periodontal tissues (e.g. phenytoin, calcium antagonists, cyclosporine, warfarin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) the last month before starting the study (V) Radiotherapy in the neck-head region (VI) HIV, TB, hepatitis or other infectious diseases (VII) Abuse with drugs or alcohol (VIII) Smoked cigarettes\> 5 cigarettes per day (IX) Untreated periodontitis (X) FMPS\> 15% at baseline (XI) FMBS\> 15% at baseline (XII) Implants with peri-implant history (XIII) Width of keratinized tissue over crest \<2 mm (XIV) Need for bone reconstruction around implants to be inserted

Clinical treatment

The protocol will follow Tomasi et al 2014 with the modification of a baseline sample taken when incising for the preparation of the flap. Briefly, following local anesthesia, flap elevation and implant placement (Sweden and Martina SpA, Padova, Italy), a specially designed abutment of four different materials (tigran gr4, tigran gr 5, zirconium and PEEK) will be connected to each implant following a double -blinded allocation and flaps will be sutured. Patients will rinse with chlorhexidine for 1 weeks until suture removal. After 24 hours from implant placement, a custum-made cutting device will be used to retrieve a circumferential biopsy of the peri-implant soft tissue. A guide pin will be connected to the abutment and a circular punch with a cutting edge will be forced apically around the abutment dissected a 1.5 mm thick collar of peri-implant soft tissue and removing it together with the abutment and the cutting device. The whole system will be placed in 4% formalin and transferred to a 70% ethanol solution after 48 h.

Cito- histological analysis

Cell Immunofluorescent staining and confocal microscopy. Once harvested with a punch around the implant neck, cells are obtained using the explant method. The 2 mm samples are first minced and then placed in a culture flask and incubated in complete media in 5% CO2 at 37°C. Alternatively, samples are placed in high glucose DMEM supplemented with 15 % FBS and antibiotics, and stored at 4 C for 24 hrs. Cells are then fixed in 4% PFA in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. To label the molecules of interest, the cells are permeabilized in PBS/10% goat serum/0.3% Triton X-100 (1h, 20°C), followed by primary antibodies (against cytoskeletal/cytoskeleton associated proteins and matrix proteins) in PBS/0.1% BSA/0.3% Triton X-100 (4°C, 20°C), washed, and incubated with secondary antibody, DAPI and/or phalloidin (4°C, 20°C). Confocal fluorescence (Leica SP8) and epifluorescence microscopy (DeltaVision system) are performed using 20x/ 0.50 NA and 40x/ 0.80 NA objectives (Olympus FV1000).

Biopsy tissue microscopy. Tissue samples obtained after surgical removal are fixed in formalin and sectioned with a vibratome (Leica, VT100s) to obtain 200 μm thick slices. For optimized antibody penetration, sequential 24 h-incubation (4°C) are performed for each primary and secondary antibody incubation and washing steps (PBS/2% goat serum/0.1% Triton X-100/0.05% NaN3). Images are acquired using two-photon microscopy with a 20x /NA 0.95 objective (Olympus XLUMPlanFI 206) and excitation at 910/1090/1180 nm.

Statistical analysis

A total of 80 samples will be taken at implant insertion and 24 hours after , each analyzed three times. The results will be expressed as mean and SD values and ANOVA and Mann-Whitney test from appropriate software (STATA version 13.1; StataCorp LP; College Station, TX) used to find the difference among the four abutment materials

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Implant Failure Nos Wound Heal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients of more than 18 years old without systemic disease/ disorders, smokers of less 5 cigarettes per day, periodontally healthy or treated with full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) ≤ 15% at baseline with edentulous space needing an all on four or all on six treatment with overdenture width of the keratinized gingiva ≥ 2 at the level of the crest

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

double-blind

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

dental implant + PEEK (test)

Dental implant insertion, material polyetheretherketone

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL