Modeling the Effects of Vocal Cord Atrophy on Airflow and Voice Quality in Elderly Individuals

NCT ID: NCT03458104

Last Updated: 2020-04-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-28

Study Completion Date

2020-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. The purpose of this study is to develop a validated computational model for assessing normative change in these patterns in patients with vocal cord atrophy before and after voice therapy.
2. This is a prospective study comparing two cohorts - patients with vocal cord atrophy(VCA) (G1) and healthy controls (G2). Subjects with VCA will receive a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan with the standard laryngeal protocol before and after voice therapy. Healthy controls will also receive one cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. Subjects with VCA (G1) will undergo post-therapy scans approximately 4 weeks after completion of voice therapy treatment. Enrolled subjects will also undergo a video stroboscopy and acoustic/aerodynamic testing. Subjects in G1 typically have these procedures performed before and after voice therapy as standard of care. Participants in G2 (healthy controls) will have the video stroboscopy and acoustic/aerodynamic testing just once since they would not otherwise be scheduled to undergo voice therapy. Potential subjects will be between 65 and 80 years of age will be considered for the study if they qualify based on inclusion criteria. Potential subjects will undergo are pre-screening process involving an initial telephone screening.
3. Raw data (measured and calculated) derived from this pilot study will be reported, and no statistical analysis will be performed. Data from specific aim 1 (G2) and specific aim 2 (G1) will be compared using graphical representations such as bar and dot plots. There is a potential for the loss of confidentiality; however, every reasonable effort will be made to limit breaches of privacy and confidentiality. Subjects may directly benefit from this study. In addition, data and conclusions derived from this study may help future patients regarding the effects of vocal therapy on vocal cord atrophy (VCA).

The investigators will recruit up to 12 subjects to account for screen failures. Once 8 eligible subjects are enrolled (4 per group), then enrollment will end.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vocal Cord Atrophy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Vocal Cord Atrophy

Quantify changes in aerodynamic and aeroacoustics patterns in patients with vocal cord atrophy (VCA) before and after voice therapy. To evaluate changes, subjects will have Laryngovideostroboscopy, Acoustic/Auerodynamic testing, and Cone Beam CT scans of the larynx before and after voice therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Intervention Type OTHER

Cone Beam CT of the larynx

Acoustic/Auerodynamic testing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Records and displays real-time sound pressure level intensity, intraoral pressure, airflow rate, and fundamental frequency

Laryngovideostroboscopy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Visualization of vocal cords in slow motion. It uses a stroboscopic lamp, which generates regular flashes of light. A flexible tube is inserted in the back of the mouth or through the nose and into the throat. Video pictures are then recorded while patients are making sound.

Healthy Volunteer

Develop a validated computational model for assessing normative laryngeal aerodynamic and aeroacoustic patterns in healthy elderly individuals. To assess normal laryngeal aerodynamic and aeroacoustic patterns in this cohort, subjects will subjects will have Laryngovideostroboscopy, Acoustic/Auerodynamic testing, and Cone Beam CT scans of the larynx.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Intervention Type OTHER

Cone Beam CT of the larynx

Acoustic/Auerodynamic testing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Records and displays real-time sound pressure level intensity, intraoral pressure, airflow rate, and fundamental frequency

Laryngovideostroboscopy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Visualization of vocal cords in slow motion. It uses a stroboscopic lamp, which generates regular flashes of light. A flexible tube is inserted in the back of the mouth or through the nose and into the throat. Video pictures are then recorded while patients are making sound.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Cone Beam CT of the larynx

Intervention Type OTHER

Acoustic/Auerodynamic testing

Records and displays real-time sound pressure level intensity, intraoral pressure, airflow rate, and fundamental frequency

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Laryngovideostroboscopy

Visualization of vocal cords in slow motion. It uses a stroboscopic lamp, which generates regular flashes of light. A flexible tube is inserted in the back of the mouth or through the nose and into the throat. Video pictures are then recorded while patients are making sound.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Between 65 and 80 years of age
* Voice Handicap Index (VHI) questionnaire score of less than 10.
* Little or no dysphonia as assessed by a speech language pathologist from the Duke Voice Care Center
* No contraindications to have a CBCT scan (as assessed per standard clinical practice)


* Between 65 and 80 years of age
* Clinical diagnosis of vocal cord atrophy (VCA)
* Treated for the above condition by a provider at the Duke Head and Neck Surgery \& Communication Sciences Clinic
* Elected to undergo voice therapy as standard of care for treatment of VCA

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to speak, read, write, and understand English
* Inability to provide written consent
* Self-reported or known allergy to Afrin or Tetracaine HCL (or related class of drugs) and unable or willing to complete the laryngovideostroboscopy procedure with it.

Vocal Cord Atrophy Cohort:


* Other conditions that affect the voice and would interfere with study measures, as determined by PI
* Inability to speak, read, write, and understand English
* Inability to provide written consent
* Self-reported or known allergy to Afrin or Tetracaine HCL (or related class of drugs) and unable or willing to complete the laryngovideostroboscopy procedure with it.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dennis Frank-Ito, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00076393

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.