A Prospective Study of Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses in Severe Aortic Stenosis
NCT ID: NCT03442400
Last Updated: 2023-01-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-02-14
2021-08-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Validation of a Predictive Model of Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis
NCT03054324
Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularisation
NCT02053038
Study of the Natural History of FFR Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
NCT01366404
Clinical Usefulness of Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement for Significant Stenosis in Proximal Coronary Artery
NCT02475291
Vascular Evaluation for Revascularization: Defining the Indications for Coronary Therapy: A Pilot Study
NCT01158053
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several factors confound the interpretation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and intermediate severity coronary stenoses, and the widely accepted cut-off value of 0.80 may not be applicable to this patient population. Coronary flow reserve is known to be attenuated under conditions of left ventricular hypertrophy and severe AS, with one study showing improvement in coronary flow reserve after aortic valve replacement. Left ventricular hypertrophy produces fixed resistance secondary to external compression of the coronary microcirculation. This potentially results in failure to achieve maximal hyperemia with adenosine and can lead to false negative FFR results. Neurohormonal influences in aortic stenosis can further attenuate vasodilator response and potentially result in false negative FFR values. Both of these conditions result in the potential deferral of lesions which may have been hemodynamically significant in the absence of severe AS. At present, there are no studies which have demonstrated validity of FFR measurement in patients with severe AS. Here, the investigators propose a prospective study of iFR/FFR in patients with AS and indeterminate coronary lesions undergoing TAVR to understand the hemodynamic consequences of AS on iFR/FFR. The investigators hypothesize that iFR/FFR values will be consistently and significantly higher pre-TAVR in comparison with post-TAVR for the same lesions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FFR/iFR arm
Volcano iFR/FFR Verrata Plus coronary pressure/flow wire
Volcano iFR/FFR Verrata Plus coronary pressure/flow wire
We will measure the degree of flow-limitation of intermediate severity coronary steonses using the iFR/FFR Verrata Plus coronary pressure/flow wire before and after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Volcano iFR/FFR Verrata Plus coronary pressure/flow wire
We will measure the degree of flow-limitation of intermediate severity coronary steonses using the iFR/FFR Verrata Plus coronary pressure/flow wire before and after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindication to adenosine, presence of cardiogenic shock, presence of acute coronary syndrome.
20 Years
110 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Volcano Corporation
INDUSTRY
The Cleveland Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Samir R Kapadia, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Cleveland Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB 17-695
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.