Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
85 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-01
2021-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Target enrollment is 68 male and female participants with low positive affect and depression or anxiety and impaired functioning, between the ages of 18 and 65 years, who will be randomized to either Positive Affect Treatment or Negative Affect Treatment (designed to reduce threat sensitivity). Participants will complete laboratory tests, psychiatric assessments, and self-report questionnaires as part of the study.
The total length of participation is around 4 months.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Affect Treatment for Depression and Anxiety
NCT05203861
Affect Treatment for Depression and Anxiety (TAD Pilot)
NCT06488859
An Online Intervention Targeting Depression and Low Reward Sensitivity
NCT05402150
A Precision Medicine Approach to Target Engagement for Emotion Regulation
NCT05651295
Positive Valence System Enhancement Treatment for Anxiety and Depression: Clinical Efficacy and Neural Changes
NCT02330627
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As an NIMH funded R61 phase trial, the purpose of the current randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy and targets of Positive Affect Treatment (designed to augment reward sensitivity) for individuals with low positive affect in the context of depression or anxiety symptoms. Targets include behavioral, cognitive, physiological and experiential measures of three reward processes: reward anticipation, response to reward attainment, and reward learning. Specificity of target engagement is assessed by comparison with Negative Affect Treatment, designed to reduce threat sensitivity.
Clinical outcomes are assessed at baseline and either weekly or at Week 5, Week 10, and Week 15 (post). Targets are assessed at baseline, Week 5, Week 10, and Week 15. Statistical models evaluate whether change in outcomes and change in target measures are greater as a result of Positive Affect Treatment compared to Negative Affect Treatment and whether changes in target measures correlate with changes in outcome measures.
Target enrollment is 68 male and female participants with low positive affect and depression or anxiety and impaired functioning between the ages of 18 and 65 who will be randomized to Positive Affect Treatment or Negative Affect Treatment, each comprising 15 individual psychotherapy sessions.
Participants will complete laboratory tests and psychiatric assessments and self-report questionnaires as part of the study. Total length of participation is around 4 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Positive Affect Treatment
15 sessions of psychotherapy designed to augment reward anticipation, reward attainment, and reward learning.
Positive Affect Treatment
Sessions 1-7: Pleasurable activities + imaginal recounting and reinforcement of positive mood effects (continued for sessions 8-15) Sessions 8-10: Cognitive exercises focusing on identifying positive aspects of experience, taking responsibility for positive outcomes, and imagining future positive events Sessions 11-14: Exercises to cultivate and savor positive experiences Session 15: Relapse prevention.
Negative Affect Treatment
15 sessions of psychotherapy designed to decrease threat avoidance, threat appraisal and arousal.
Negative Affect Treatment
Sessions 1-7: Exposure therapy to feared or avoided situations, sensations, or memories (continued for sessions 8-15) Sessions 8-10: Cognitive restructuring of probability, cost, and attributional biases Sessions 11-14: Capnometry-assisted respiratory training Session 15: Relapse prevention
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Positive Affect Treatment
Sessions 1-7: Pleasurable activities + imaginal recounting and reinforcement of positive mood effects (continued for sessions 8-15) Sessions 8-10: Cognitive exercises focusing on identifying positive aspects of experience, taking responsibility for positive outcomes, and imagining future positive events Sessions 11-14: Exercises to cultivate and savor positive experiences Session 15: Relapse prevention.
Negative Affect Treatment
Sessions 1-7: Exposure therapy to feared or avoided situations, sensations, or memories (continued for sessions 8-15) Sessions 8-10: Cognitive restructuring of probability, cost, and attributional biases Sessions 11-14: Capnometry-assisted respiratory training Session 15: Relapse prevention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Low positive affect indexed by less than or equal to 24 on the positive affect subscale of the PANAS (i.e., PANAS-P); and scores of greater than or equal to 11 for depression, greater to or equal to 6 for anxiety, or greater to or equal to 10 for stress on the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale; and scores of greater than or equal to 5 on any Sheehan Disability Scale subscale.
* Willingness to refrain from starting other psychosocial or pharmacological treatments until study completion.
Exclusion Criteria
* Active suicidal ideation
* Lifetime history of bipolar disorder, psychosis, mental retardation, or organic brain damage
* Substance abuse in the last 6 months or dependence within last 12 months.
* 11 or more cigarettes per week or nicotine equivalent.
* History of marijuana, cocaine or stimulant use 5-7 times/week or more before age 15 (e.g., amphetamine, cocaine, methamphetamine)
* Pregnancy
* Bupropion, dopaminergic or neuroleptic medication use in the past 6 months
* Heterocyclics and SSRIs are permitted if stabilized (3 months) and PRN benzodiazepines and beta-blockers are permitted but discouraged on laboratory assessment visits
* Refusal of video/audio-taping
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Southern Methodist University
OTHER
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michelle Craske
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Uribe S, Kumar D, Rosenfield D, Ritz T, Meuret AE. From in-person to virtual: The impact of crisis-enforced delivery change on treatment for low positive affect, depression, and anxiety. J Affect Disord. 2025 Dec 15;391:119864. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119864. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
Craske MG, Meuret AE, Echiverri-Cohen A, Rosenfield D, Ritz T. Positive affect treatment targets reward sensitivity: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2023 Jun;91(6):350-366. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000805. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.