Lay Fieldworker Led School Health Program for Rural Primary Schools
NCT ID: NCT03423615
Last Updated: 2018-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2909 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-02-01
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A potential alternative approach is to leverage existing community members as lay fieldworkers for the delivery of school health promotion. Our hypothesis is that lay-fieldworkers can effectively implement comprehensive school health programs in resource-constrained primary schools. This hypothesis will be tested by retrospectively analyzing data obtained during a 5-year pilot of a school health program (CHHIP) in rural primary schools of the Darjeeling Himalayas of India.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Enhancing Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Control Through Parent-Teachers-Development Agents Network in Ethiopia
NCT06639412
Southwest Health Extension Partnership to Enhance Research Dissemination
NCT02515578
Effectiveness of a School-centered Prevention Program on Prevalence of Latent Rheumatic Heart Disease
NCT05504928
Integrated NCD Intervention in Rural Nepal
NCT04087369
Antibiotics and Activity Spaces: An Exploratory Study of Behaviour, Marginalisation, and Knowledge Diffusion
NCT03241316
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
From 2012 to 2016, the CHHIP program was implemented by Darjeeling Prerna, an Indian non-governmental organization, in the rural Darjeeling Himalayas, a region of the state of West Bengal in India. The program was implemented in both low-cost private and government primary schools. A convenience sample of 22 primary schools (13 government and 9 low-cost private) was chosen by the project team. Program implementation occurred in 16 schools and was led by 4 lay fieldworkers. The intervention was implemented as a community development program with a rigorous evaluation component and all data was collected prospectively. This research study was added post-hoc with data transmitted to the research team prior to any analysis.
The study is designed as a mixed methods stepped-wedge cluster controlled evaluation. A primary school will be a cluster and each step in the study will be a single academic year. In accordance with guidelines for the design and evaluation of complex evaluations, this study will couple process evaluation with that of definitive impact. The intervention will be evaluated across three domains: outcomes, implementation, and mechanism of impact.
The primary impact outcome will be the incidence of diarrheal illness as assessed by 14-day parental recall. A secondary outcome, health knowledge as assessed by pre and post-test, will be utilized as a key mediator to assess for differential impact on mechanisms of impact. Statistical analysis will be carried out as a comparison between the intervention and control arms within the context of the stepped-wedge framework. The analysis will be based on individual student-level data, with the unit of assignment (schools) included as a cluster effect in the regression analysis. Exposures of interest will be explored for association with the outcome in univariate analyses. Diarrheal incidence rate ratios will be calculated via multivariable Poisson regression analysis and mean difference in health knowledge post-test scores will be obtained using a multivariable linear mixed model. All P-values will be 2-tailed and significance will be set at P\<0.05.
To study implementation, process outcomes will be obtained via a series of descriptive analysis. Coverage rates for individual health interventions and performance evaluations scores expressed as means and standard deviations will be obtained. In consultation with the project team, the research study team will define benchmarks for reach and fidelity, prior to analysis of data.
Qualitative data will be integrated with quantitative data via a process of triangulation. This data was obtained from parents and teachers in focus groups and lay fieldworkers in semi-structured interviews. Coding and analysis of the qualitative data will begin with a deductive coding method. Common themes, including important contrary opinions, will be identified and illustrative quotes will be selected.
All quantitative analysis will be done in SPSS and qualitative analysis completed in CATMA. The reporting and presentation of this trial will be in accordance with the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs (TREND) guidelines.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CHHIP Arm
All enrolled students in schools in the CHHIP Arm were eligible to receive the CHHIP intervention. The CHHIP intervention was delivered by lay fieldworkers (SHAs). Intervention activities included:
1. Health Education: activity-based curriculum with lessons delivered once per week. Units include hygiene, nutrition, safety, disease prevention\& management, and social, emotional, and behavior development.
2. Basic Primary Health Services: school-based treatment including deworming and iron supplementation; screening and referral programs including growth monitoring, well-child exam, vision screening, epilepsy screening, and oral health; psychosocial and counseling support for students with atypical behaviors.
3. Health School Environment: improvements to physical infrastructure including latrines and water systems; modeling of positive behavior reinforcement, inclusive learning environment, and avoidance of corporal punishment.
Comprehensive Health & Hygiene Improvement Program (CHHIP)
CHHIP is an intense, multi-component holistic school health program based on the WHO Health Promoting School framework and designed for implementation by lay fieldworkers.
Comparison Arm
All enrolled students in schools in the Comparison Arm received school health activities as were routinely available in their school, through their curriculum, or through special events.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Comprehensive Health & Hygiene Improvement Program (CHHIP)
CHHIP is an intense, multi-component holistic school health program based on the WHO Health Promoting School framework and designed for implementation by lay fieldworkers.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
3 Years
13 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Broadleaf Health and Education Alliance
OTHER
Darjeeling Ladenla Road Prerna (DLRP)
UNKNOWN
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Matergia, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Center for Global Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Matergia M, Ferrarone P, Khan Y, Matergia DW, Giri P, Thapa S, Simoes EAF. Lay Field-worker-Led School Health Program for Primary Schools in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Pediatrics. 2019 Apr;143(4):e20180975. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0975. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-2105
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.