Prevention of Infections in Cardiac Surgery (PICS) Prevena Study

NCT ID: NCT03402945

Last Updated: 2025-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

4107 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-05

Study Completion Date

2024-10-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This vanguard study will be conducted at two study sites in Canada. It is a cluster randomized trial to test a combination of two antibiotics for antibiotic prophylaxis as compared to routine prophylaxis with one single antibiotic, and to test a negative-pressure wound management system (Prevena) versus standard wound dressing to reduce chest wound infections.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite the routine use of antibiotics before and after cardiac surgery, infections of the chest wound remain a common life threatening complication of heart surgery that is preventable. Antibiotic prophylaxis is well accepted to be the cornerstone of prevention for these infections. The best choice of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing open heart surgery is, however, unclear. A large number of relevant pathogens are not covered by the primarily recommended antibiotic for prophylaxis, and there is a large variability in the antibiotics physicians use in practice and a lack of evidence supporting these choices. Appropriate management of the wound is probably also highly relevant in terms of infection prevention; however, there is a lack of strong evidence guiding the choice of wound management strategies as a means to reduce surgical site infection. The proposed study will test whether dual antibiotic prophylaxis is superior to single-agent prophylaxis with cefazolin, and shed light on whether or not modern negative-pressure wound management technology lower the risk of sternal surgical site infections.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgical Site Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

1\) cefazolin prophylaxis plus Prevena\*(\*diabetic and/or obese patients (BMI \>30kg/m2)) 2) cefazolin and vancomycin prophylaxis plus Prevena\*(\*diabetic and/or obese patients (BMI \>30kg/m2)), 3) cefazolin prophylaxis plus standard wound dressing, 4) cefazolin and vancomycin prophylaxis plus standard wound dressing.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Blinded adjudication of the s-SSIs will be performed by a committee consisting of three members.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1

cefazolin prophylaxis plus Prevena negative-pressure wound management system . Cefazolin 2g (or 3g if greater than 120kg body weight) will be given within an hour of surgery, followed by one intra-operative dose of cefazolin at 4 hours after the first dose or upon wound closure (whatever comes first), and finally two post-operative doses q8h.

Prevena will be applied to all diabetic and/or obese patients (BMI \>30kg/m2) at the end of surgery on the sternal as well as the vein harvest site (if open saphenous vein harvest) in the OR and left in place for 7 day

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prevena

Intervention Type DEVICE

Negative-Pressure Wound Management System

Cefazolin

Intervention Type DRUG

antibiotic

Arm 2

cefazolin and vancomycin prophylaxis plus Prevena negative-pressure wound management system. Cefazolin 2g (or 3g if greater than 120kg body weight) within an hour of surgery, followed by one intra-operative dose of cefazolin at 4 hrs after the first dose or upon wound closure (whatever comes first), and finally two post-operative doses q8h. Vancomycin at roughly 15mg/kg body weight intravenously, i.e. 1g, or 1.5g if greater than 85kg body weight. No intra-operative dose of vancomycin will be given, and a single second dose will be given 12 hours after the first dose.

Prevena will be applied to all diabetic and/or obese patients (BMI \>30kg/m2) at the end of surgery on the sternal as well as the vein harvest site (if open saphenous vein harvest) in the OR and left in place for 7 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prevena

Intervention Type DEVICE

Negative-Pressure Wound Management System

Cefazolin

Intervention Type DRUG

antibiotic

Vancomycin

Intervention Type DRUG

antibiotic

Arm 3

cefazolin prophylaxis plus standard wound dressing. Cefazolin 2g (or 3g if greater than 120kg body weight) within an hour of surgery, followed by one intra-operative dose of cefazolin at 4 hours after the first dose or upon wound closure (whatever comes first), and finally two post-operative doses q8h.

Standard wound dressing: non-negative wound dressing as standard of care at the study site.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cefazolin

Intervention Type DRUG

antibiotic

standard wound dressing

Intervention Type OTHER

Any non-negative pressure wound dressing that is routinely used at study sites will be considered standard of care in the control arms.

Arm 4

cefazolin and vancomycin prophylaxis plus standard wound dressing. Cefazolin 2g (or 3g if greater than 120kg body weight) within an hour of surgery, followed by one intra-operative dose of cefazolin at 4 hours after the first dose or upon wound closure (whatever comes first), and finally two post-operative doses q8h. Vancomycin at roughly 15mg/kg body weight intravenously, i.e. 1g, or 1.5g if greater than 85kg body weight. No intra-operative dose of vancomycin will be given, and a single second dose will be given 12 hours after the first dose.

Standard wound dressing: non-negative wound dressing as standard of care at the study site.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cefazolin

Intervention Type DRUG

antibiotic

Vancomycin

Intervention Type DRUG

antibiotic

standard wound dressing

Intervention Type OTHER

Any non-negative pressure wound dressing that is routinely used at study sites will be considered standard of care in the control arms.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prevena

Negative-Pressure Wound Management System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cefazolin

antibiotic

Intervention Type DRUG

Vancomycin

antibiotic

Intervention Type DRUG

standard wound dressing

Any non-negative pressure wound dressing that is routinely used at study sites will be considered standard of care in the control arms.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Vancocin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- ≥18 years of age undergoing open-heart surgery (sternotomy, including minimally-invasive sternotomies)

Exclusion Criteria

* On systemic antibiotics or with an active bacterial infection at the time of surgery
* Patients previously enrolled in this trial
* Patients known to be colonized with Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA)(unethical not to administer glycopeptides), beta-lactam or vancomycin allergy precluding the use of cefazolin or vancomycin, respectively, or to silver precluding the use of Prevena
* Participation in other studies that may interfere with this trial
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Population Health Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dominik Mertz, MD,MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hamilton General Hospital

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre & Lawson Health Research Institute

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Connolly SJ, Philippon F, Longtin Y, Casanova A, Birnie DH, Exner DV, Dorian P, Prakash R, Alings M, Krahn AD. Randomized cluster crossover trials for reliable, efficient, comparative effectiveness testing: design of the Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial (PADIT). Can J Cardiol. 2013 Jun;29(6):652-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.01.020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23702356 (View on PubMed)

Mertz D, Whitlock R, Kokoszka AY, Smith SW, Carignan A, Rehan M, Jaffer IH, Alsagheir A, Loeb M. Routine Surveillance Versus Independent Assessment by an Outcome Adjudication Committee in Assessing Patients for Sternal Surgical Site Infections After Cardiac Surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 May;37(5):600-2. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.347. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26782707 (View on PubMed)

Filsoufi F, Castillo JG, Rahmanian PB, Broumand SR, Silvay G, Carpentier A, Adams DH. Epidemiology of deep sternal wound infection in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Aug;23(4):488-94. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.02.007. Epub 2009 Apr 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19376733 (View on PubMed)

Edwards FH, Engelman RM, Houck P, Shahian DM, Bridges CR; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series: Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Cardiac Surgery, Part I: Duration. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jan;81(1):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.034. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16368422 (View on PubMed)

Lador A, Nasir H, Mansur N, Sharoni E, Biderman P, Leibovici L, Paul M. Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Mar;67(3):541-50. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr470. Epub 2011 Nov 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22083832 (View on PubMed)

Mertz D, Johnstone J, Loeb M. Does duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis matter in cardiac surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011 Jul;254(1):48-54. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318214b7e4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21412147 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PICS-PREVENA V1_20171106

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Local Antibiotics for Breast Implants
NCT04731025 RECRUITING PHASE3