A Study on Accuracy Improvement of Repeated Measure Uroflowmetry- Electromyography

NCT ID: NCT03399877

Last Updated: 2019-01-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

51 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-12-04

Study Completion Date

2019-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Uroflowmetry(UF) has been the standard first-line diagnostic tool for the evaluation of pediatric voiding dysfunction. But recently, UF combined with pelvic flow electromyography(EMG) is emphasized and recommended to analyze the separate contributions of the detrusor and bladder outlet and sole UF is discouraged except for the follow-up study after abnormal UF/EMG result(Bauer et al., 2015). However, electrode itself can disturb pelvic floor relaxation and there is no evidence about necessity of consecutive UF/EMG test. Therefore, the investigators are going to compare three different methods (Primary-Secondary: UF/EMG-UF/EMG, UF/EMG-sole UF, sole UF-UF/EMG)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Enuresis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Children who meet the inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria are assigned to perform one of the three test protocols in order of registration according to a computer gererated randomization list. Children who assigned group A perform uroflowmetry-electromyography for the first and subsequently perform uroflowmetry-electromyography again. Children who assigned Group B perform uroflowmetry-electromyography for the first, and subsequently perform sole uroflowmetry. Children who assigned Group C firstly perform sole uroflowmetry and subsequently perform uroflowmetry-electromyography.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Combining electromygraphy with uroflowmetry

Children who assigned group A perform uroflowmetry-electromyography for the first and subsequently perform uroflowmetry-electromyography

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Combining electromyography with uroflowmetry (group A)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Children who assigned group A perform uroflowmetry-electromyography for the first and subsequently perform uroflowmetry-electromyography again.

Uroflowmetry

Children who assigned Group B perform uroflowmetry-electromyography for the first, and subsequently perform uroflowmetry solely.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Uroflowmetry(Group B)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Children who assigned Group B perform uroflowmetry-electromyography for the first, and subsequently perform sole uroflowmetry.

Uroflowmetry-Combining electromygraphy with uroflowmetry

Children who assigned Group C firstly perform uroflowmetry solely. and subsequently perform uroflowmetry-electromyography.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Uroflowmetry-Combining electromyography with uroflowmetry (Group C)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Children who assigned Group C firstly perform sole uroflowmetry and subsequently perform uroflowmetry-electromyography.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Combining electromyography with uroflowmetry (group A)

Children who assigned group A perform uroflowmetry-electromyography for the first and subsequently perform uroflowmetry-electromyography again.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Uroflowmetry(Group B)

Children who assigned Group B perform uroflowmetry-electromyography for the first, and subsequently perform sole uroflowmetry.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Uroflowmetry-Combining electromyography with uroflowmetry (Group C)

Children who assigned Group C firstly perform sole uroflowmetry and subsequently perform uroflowmetry-electromyography.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1\) children aged 5 to 11.9 who visit pediatric urology department for enuresis.

Exclusion Criteria

1. If children have experience of performing uroflowmetry or uroflowmetry-electromyography.
2. If children do not cooperate on performing the test
3. If enuresis is caused by neurological or anatomical problem.
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yonsei University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Urology,

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yong Seung Lee, MD

Role: CONTACT

82-2-2228-2310

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yong Seung Lee, MD

Role: primary

82-2-2228-2310

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4-2017-0842

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Urodynamics: Prone Vs. Seated Position
NCT06864117 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA