SPI-guided vs PRD-guided Analgesia During FESS for Intraoperative Blood Loss
NCT ID: NCT03389763
Last Updated: 2018-01-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
105 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-06-01
2018-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pupillometry - Future of Objective Pain Reaction Measurement While Unconscious
NCT04000126
Monitoring Pupillary Reflex Dilatation for Optimized Postoperative Opioid Delivery Before Extubation.
NCT04594382
Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) Versus Standard Clinical Approach Analgesia
NCT03218306
Anesthesia Techniques, Neuroprotection and Surgical Field in FESS Under Controlled Hypotension
NCT07181564
Pupillary Dilation Reflex Assessment for Intraoperative Analgesic Titration.
NCT03248908
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, intraoperative blood loss is estimated based on Boezaart Bleeding Scale (BBS) (0 - no bleeding (cadaveric conditions), 1 - Slight bleeding, no suctioning required, 2 - Slight bleeding, occasional suctioning required, 3 - Slight bleeding, frequent suctioning required; bleeding threatens surgical field a few seconds after suction is removed, 4 - Moderate bleeding, frequent suctioning required, and bleeding threatens surgical field directly after suction is removed, 5 - Severe bleeding, constant suctioning required; bleeding appears faster than can be removed by suction; surgical field severely threatened and surgery usually not possible).
Recently, the Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) and Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PRD) were added as a surrogate variable showing the nociception-antinociception balance into above mentioned parameters constituting a novel approach in monitoring patients intraoperatively, known as adequacy of anaesthesia (AoA) or tailor-made anaesthesia. PRD value \>5% reflects increased sensitivity to painful stimulus as well as delta SPI\>10 or any SPI\>50, and they constitute the indication for administration of rescue analgesia intraoperatively.
This study aims at evaluating utility of SPI-directed analgesia or PRD-directed analgesia or Boezaart scale-directed analgesia using remifentanil on the intraoperative blood loss, haemodynamic stability and time duration of surgery.
Currently, FESS is most often performed using total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) which is by majority of anaesthesiologists believed to reduce the intraoperative blood loss compared to general anaesthesia using volatile anaesthetics, but literature provides conflicting findings in this area.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SPI-guided remifentanyl
remifentanyl solution will be administered intravenously at a rate 0,25 mcg/kg of body weight/minute, SPI will be monitored on-line; when delta SPI\>15, infusion speed of remifentanyl will be increased by 50%
Remifentanil
a rate of infusion will be increased by 50% every 5 minutes
PRD-guided remifentanyl
solution remifentanyl solution will be administered intravenously at a rate 0,25 mcg/kg of body weight/minute, PRD measurement every 15 minutes; when PRD\>5% infusion speed of remifentanyl will be increased by 50%
Remifentanil
a rate of infusion will be increased by 50% every 5 minutes
BBS-guided remifentanyl
BBS assessment every 5 minutes, solution remifentanyl solution will be administered intravenously at a rate 0,25 mcg/kg of body weight/minute; when BBS\>2, infusion speed of remifentanyl will be increased by 50%
Remifentanil
a rate of infusion will be increased by 50% every 5 minutes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Remifentanil
a rate of infusion will be increased by 50% every 5 minutes
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* written consent to undergo functional endoscopic sinus surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-III
Exclusion Criteria
* allergy to propofol
* pregnancy
* any anatomical malformation making PRD or SE measurement impossible
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Silesia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michał Stasiowski
Principal Investigator, 2Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Przemysław O Jałowiecki, Ph.Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of Silesia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University of Silesia
Sosnowiec, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bhat Pai RV, Badiger S, Sachidananda R, Basappaji SM, Shanbhag R, Rao R. Comparison of surgical conditions following premedication with oral clonidine versus oral diazepam for endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomized, double-blinded study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Apr-Jun;32(2):250-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.182112.
Cardesin A, Pontes C, Rosell R, Escamilla Y, Marco J, Escobar MJ, Bernal-Sprekelsen M. Hypotensive anaesthesia and bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery: an observational study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jun;271(6):1505-11. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2700-0. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
Yoo HS, Han JH, Park SW, Kim KS. Comparison of surgical condition in endoscopic sinus surgery using remifentanil combined with propofol, sevoflurane, or desflurane. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Dec;59(6):377-82. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.59.6.377. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
Cafiero T, Cavallo LM, Frangiosa A, Burrelli R, Gargiulo G, Cappabianca P, de Divitiis E. Clinical comparison of remifentanil-sevoflurane vs. remifentanil-propofol for endoscopic endonasal transphenoidal surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 May;24(5):441-6. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506002080. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
Sivaci R, Yilmaz MD, Balci C, Erincler T, Unlu H. Comparison of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia by means of blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery. Saudi Med J. 2004 Dec;25(12):1995-8.
Marzban S, Haddadi S, Mahmoudi Nia H, Heidarzadeh A, Nemati S, Naderi Nabi B. Comparison of surgical conditions during propofol or isoflurane anesthesia for endoscopic sinus surgery. Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Sep;3(2):234-8. doi: 10.5812/aapm.9891. Epub 2013 Sep 1.
Cardesin A, Pontes C, Rosell R, Escamilla Y, Marco J, Escobar MJ, Bernal-Sprekelsen M. A randomised double blind clinical trial to compare surgical field bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery with clonidine-based or remifentanil-based hypotensive anaesthesia. Rhinology. 2015 Jun;53(2):107-15. doi: 10.4193/Rhino14.185.
Drozdowski A, Sieskiewicz A, Siemiatkowski A. [Reduction of intraoperative bleeding during functional endoscopic sinus surgery]. Anestezjol Intens Ter. 2011 Jan-Mar;43(1):45-50. Polish.
Shen PH, Weitzel EK, Lai JT, Wormald PJ, Ho CS. Intravenous esmolol infusion improves surgical fields during sevoflurane-anesthetized endoscopic sinus surgery: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):e208-11. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3701.
DeConde AS, Thompson CF, Wu EC, Suh JD. Systematic review and meta-analysis of total intravenous anesthesia and endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Oct;3(10):848-54. doi: 10.1002/alr.21196. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
Gomez-Rivera F, Cattano D, Ramaswamy U, Patel CB, Altamirano A, Man LX, Luong A, Chen Z, Citardi MJ, Fakhri S. Pilot study comparing total intravenous anesthesia to inhalational anesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery: novel approach of blood flow quantification. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012 Nov;121(11):725-32. doi: 10.1177/000348941212101105.
Blackwell KE, Ross DA, Kapur P, Calcaterra TC. Propofol for maintenance of general anesthesia: a technique to limit blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Otolaryngol. 1993 Jul-Aug;14(4):262-6. doi: 10.1016/0196-0709(93)90072-f.
Nekhendzy V, Lemmens HJ, Vaughan WC, Hepworth EJ, Chiu AG, Church CA, Brock-Utne JG. The effect of deliberate hypercapnia and hypocapnia on intraoperative blood loss and quality of surgical field during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1404-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000282781.56025.52.
Manola M, De Luca E, Moscillo L, Mastella A. Using remifentanil and sufentanil in functional endoscopic sinus surgery to improve surgical conditions. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2005;67(2):83-6. doi: 10.1159/000084576. Epub 2005 Mar 22.
Puthenveettil N, Rajan S, Kumar L, Nair SG. A comparison of effects of oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Anesth Essays Res. 2013 Sep-Dec;7(3):371-5. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.123244.
Guglielminotti J, Grillot N, Paule M, Mentre F, Servin F, Montravers P, Longrois D. Prediction of movement to surgical stimulation by the pupillary dilatation reflex amplitude evoked by a standardized noxious test. Anesthesiology. 2015 May;122(5):985-93. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000624.
Paulus J, Roquilly A, Beloeil H, Theraud J, Asehnoune K, Lejus C. Pupillary reflex measurement predicts insufficient analgesia before endotracheal suctioning in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2013 Jul 24;17(4):R161. doi: 10.1186/cc12840.
Migeon A, Desgranges FP, Chassard D, Blaise BJ, De Queiroz M, Stewart A, Cejka JC, Combet S, Rhondali O. Pupillary reflex dilatation and analgesia nociception index monitoring to assess the effectiveness of regional anesthesia in children anesthetised with sevoflurane. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Dec;23(12):1160-5. doi: 10.1111/pan.12243. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
Aissou M, Snauwaert A, Dupuis C, Atchabahian A, Aubrun F, Beaussier M. Objective assessment of the immediate postoperative analgesia using pupillary reflex measurement: a prospective and observational study. Anesthesiology. 2012 May;116(5):1006-12. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318251d1fb.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SilesianMUKOAiIT3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.