Evaluation of Optimal Ablation Index for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With AF Prospective Registry
NCT ID: NCT03389074
Last Updated: 2020-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
70 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-01-23
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Through the Phase 1 study, the investigators will prospectively analyze data including ablation parameters, AI and acute outcomes of 20 patients performed PVI with conventional ablation strategy (AI-blinded).
After Phase 1 study results, optimal target AI value for each predefined PV segment will be determined. Then, by applying optimal AI values derived from the Phase 1 study, the investigators will evaluate the feasibility of the AI-guided procedure and verify the optimal AI value for acute PVI outcomes in the prospectively enrolled patients (n = 30) in the Phase 2 study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ablation Index Guided High Power Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
NCT04379557
Efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT03514693
Clinical Value of Linear Ablation Without Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT05468528
Left Atrial Function Analysis for Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation
NCT03242694
FIRM Ablation Versus Pulmonary Vein Isolation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF)
NCT02703454
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
AI value will be derived from comprehensive off-line analysis of ablation parameters including contact force, time, power and AI of these 30 240 patients by predefined 14 segments.
Through comparison of AI of each segment with or without acute outcomes including PV residual potential after first encirclement/early reconnection (ER)/dormant conduction (DC), minimal AI value would be drawndetermined, and optimal AI value will be suggested for future AI-guided ablation strategy Phase 2 study (AI-guided ablation strategy).
2. Phase 2 The Phase 2 study aims to evaluate the feasibility of applying optimal AI values derived from the Phase 1 study, and to verify optimal values through AI-guided ablation. Thirty patients with AF will be prospectively and consecutively enrolled. AI information will be opened to the operator during ablation, and Visitag annotation criteria will also be used for AI-guided ablation with pre-set minimum target values for each segment derived from the Phase 1 study. After the procedure, the proportion of ablation points within the target AI value will be calculated by evaluation of the feasibility of the AI-guided ablation strategy. Acute outcomes of PVI including PV residual potential after first encirclement, ER, and DC will be evaluated based on predefined segments.
3. Comparison of conventional vs. AI-guided ablation The investigators will compare the acute outcomes of PVI using two different strategies: conventional vs. AI-guided ablation. During 1 year of follow-up in both groups, AF recurrence will be evaluated at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months using rhythm surveillance (ECG or 24-hour Holter monitoring). The AF recurrence rate at 1 year after PVI will be compared between the two groups. In addition, total ablation time, fluoroscopic time, procedure time, and complication rates for the index procedure will be compared between the two groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Radiofrequency catheter ablation
minimally-invasive procedure used to remove or terminate a faulty electrical pathway from sections of the hearts of those who are prone to developing cardiac arrhythmias.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF who had failed with anti-arrhythmic agents
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with left atrial (LA) diameter more than 50mm
* Inability or unwillingness to receive oral anticoagulation with a Vitamin K antagonist (VKA)or non-VKA (NOAC) agent
* Known severe left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction\<35%)
* Pregnancy
20 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Seoul National University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eue-Keun Choi
Associate Professor, MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Euekeun Choi, M.D. Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Seoul National University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Seoul National university Hostpital
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lee SR, Choi EK, Lee EJ, Choe WS, Cha MJ, Oh S. Efficacy of the optimal ablation index-targeted strategy for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: the OPTIMUM study results. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Aug;55(2):171-181. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00565-4. Epub 2019 May 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OPTIMUM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.