Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
117 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-06-07
2019-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neuraxial Labor Analgesia and the Incidence of Postpartum Depression
NCT02823418
Sleep-Disordered Breathing and PAP in Perinatal Depression
NCT02507297
Insomnia and Rumination in Late Pregnancy and the Risk for Postpartum Depression
NCT03596879
Maternal Expectations on Labor Analgesia and Risk of Postpartum Depression: An Observational Study
NCT07292649
CSE v. Epidural for Postpartum Depression
NCT03022526
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The main outcome measure is the pain evaluated by VAS at one, five , nine and 13 hours after the placement of double balloon induction catheter. The investigators assess also the effect of the sleep disturbance and depression of the mother to the pain during balloon catheter induction of the labour.
The total hospital stay and induction to delivery interval time is measured. Also the mode of birth as well as maternal and neonatal morbidity and patient satisfaction are recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Outpatient group
After insertion of induction catheter for labor, women of the outpatient group can go home and assess their pain with visual analogy scale at home. The intervention is to go home.
Intervention for outpatient group was to go home.
Intervention for outpatient group was to go home
Intervention for outpatient group was to go home and assess the the pain
Inpatient group
After insertion of induction catheter for labor, women of the inpatient group assess their pain with visual analogy scale in the ward. The intervention is to stay at ward.
Intervention for inpatient group was to stay at ward.
Intervention for inpatient group was to stay at ward
Intervention for inpatient group was to stay at ward and assess the pain
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intervention for outpatient group was to go home
Intervention for outpatient group was to go home and assess the the pain
Intervention for inpatient group was to stay at ward
Intervention for inpatient group was to stay at ward and assess the pain
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* singleton pregnancy
* pregnancy weeks ≥ 37 - ≤ 41+5
* the patient is living in1/2 hour away from hospital
Exclusion Criteria
* the patient has medical treatment of diabetes
* baby is not growing normally
* multiple pregnancy
* preterm rupture of membranes
* earlier caesarean section
* the patient is living more than 1/2 hour away from hospital
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Turku
OTHER
Turku University Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kirsi Rinne
Senior Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kirsi M Rinne, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Turku University Hospital
Päivi ML Polo, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Turku University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Turku University Hospital
Turku, , Finland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Henry A, Madan A, Reid R, Tracy SK, Austin K, Welsh A, Challis D. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jan 29;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-25.
Sciscione AC, Muench M, Pollock M, Jenkins TM, Tildon-Burton J, Colmorgen GH. Transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;98(5 Pt 1):751-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01579-4.
Prager M, Eneroth-Grimfors E, Edlund M, Marions L. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction. BJOG. 2008 Oct;115(11):1443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01843.x. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
T146/2017
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.