Specifying Interventions From the Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC)

NCT ID: NCT03380351

Last Updated: 2024-05-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

17 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-26

Study Completion Date

2024-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to specify the interventions, implementation strategies and control conditions from the Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC) using a mixed-methods approach to study site materials and conduct semi-structured qualitative interviews with site representatives (N=3 per site). We focused on the Emergency Department Working Group from the SCDIC working groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The long-term goal of this line of research is to identify the most effective components of SCD interventions while also identifying effective implementation strategies informed by a systematic and rigorous work done by the members of the SCDIC consortium to improve the quality of life of people with SCD, a life-threatening hematological disorder. This study aims to collect detailed information about the planned interventions, the implementation strategies and the control conditions from each site.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anemia, Sickle Cell

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SCDIC interventions

Careful detail the intervention components and the implementation strategies (i.e., the mechanisms by which the interventions are being delivered in usual care) being developed by the consortium.

SCDIC interventions

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The research team will characterize the intervention components and their implementation strategies.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SCDIC interventions

The research team will characterize the intervention components and their implementation strategies.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* three representatives of each of the SDIC sites: the Principal Investigator, and two people nominated by the PI.

Exclusion Criteria

* none
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ana Baumann, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington University in St. Louis

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nwosu C, Khan H, Masese R, Nocek JM, Gollan S, Varughese T, Bourne S, Clesca C, Jacobs SR, Baumann A, Klesges LM, Shah N, Hankins JS, Smeltzer MP. Recruitment Strategies in the Integration of Mobile Health Into Sickle Cell Disease Care to Increase Hydroxyurea Utilization Study (meSH): Multicenter Survey Study. JMIR Form Res. 2024 Apr 16;8:e48767. doi: 10.2196/48767.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38625729 (View on PubMed)

Baumann AA. Commentary: Adapting and Operationalizing the RE-AIM Framework for Implementation Science in Environmental Health: Clean Fuel Cooking Programs in Low Resource Countries. Front Public Health. 2020 Jun 9;8:218. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00218. eCollection 2020. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32582613 (View on PubMed)

Baumann AA, Belle SH, James A, King AA; Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium. Specifying sickle cell disease interventions: a study protocol of the Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC). BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 27;18(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3297-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29945631 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3U01HL133994-02S1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

3U01HL133994-02S1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CHOICES3: Sickle Cell Disease Parenting CHOICES
NCT05292781 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA