Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Midostaurin (PKC412) in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy During Induction and Consolidation Followed by 12 Months of Maintenance Monotherapy in Patients With Newly-diagnosed FMS-like Tyrosine 3 (FLT3) Kinase Receptor-mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
NCT ID: NCT03379727
Last Updated: 2024-02-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
301 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-02-13
2021-07-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Global Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Midostaurin + Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Patients With FLT3 Mutation Negative (FLT3-MN) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT03512197
An Expanded Treatment Protocol (ETP) of Midostaurin (PKC412) in Patients 18 Years of Age or Older With Newly-diagnosed FLT3-mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT03114228
A Global Study of Midostaurin in Combination With Chemotherapy to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics in Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Patients With FLT3 Mutated AML
NCT03591510
Midostaurin Access Program for Newly Diagnosed FLT3 (ITD or TKD) Mutated AML Adult Patients Eligible for Standard Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy
NCT02624570
Daunorubicin, Cytarabine, and Midostaurin in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00651261
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients who were newly diagnosed with AML, had a known FLT3 ITD (Internal tandem duplication) or TKD (Tyrosine kinase domain)(, mutation and had recently started on "7+3" or "5+2" in induction and high dose of cytarabine in consolidation were consented and screened for the clinical study.
.
The protocol treatment allowed the following treatment phases:
* Induction Phase: cytarabine with anthracycline (idarubicin or daunorubicin) sequentially per HCP choice, followed by midostaurin on day 8. In the first Induction phase, a bone marrow aspiration was performed in all subjects on Days 21- 28 (according to local standard of care) to determine the need for a second induction cycle. If the marrow aspirate was inadequate to make a determination, the bone marrow assessment was repeated within one week. If the Day 21-28 (according to local standard of care) bone marrow aspiration reveals ≥ 5% leukemic blasts in a cellular marrow (\> 20%) a second induction was given. For subjects requiring a second induction, treatment began at least 3 days after completing midostaurin. Bone marrow aspiration was performed within one week after recovery of ANC ≥ 1000/μL and platelets ≥ 100,000/μL to assess for response. Subjects in CR proceeded to consolidation therapy. Subjects not achieving a marrow remission (or with persistent blasts) were to be removed from protocol therapy. Subjects with CRi proceeded to consolidation therapy as per investigator's discretion. 1 or 2 cycles of "7+3" or "5+2" regimens (switching between regimens was not allowed).
* Consolidation Phase (for subjects in CR/CRi after consolidation therapy) (up to four cycles of cytarabine consolidation per investigator's discretion, with midostaurin given sequentially during each cycle): Based upon the superior results reported for AML subjects less than 60 years old with normal karyotypes in prospective clinical trials and RATIFY, who achieved a CR/CRi after induction received further therapy with midostaurin. Subjects received up to four cycles of consolidation therapy. Each consolidation cycle was four weeks in duration, and was to begin within two weeks following hematologic recovery (ANC ≥ 1000/μL, platelet count ≥ 100,000/μL), but not sooner than 31 days from the beginning of the previous cycle. A bone marrow aspiration was to be performed prior to the first consolidation cycle (C1D1) and later could be performed if necessary per investigator's decision at any time during Consolidation Phase.
* Maintenance Phase (for subjects in CR/CRi after consolidation therapy): Subjects who continued in CR/CRi (by bone marrow aspiration and blood evaluation) after four cycles of consolidation therapy received midostaurin. Prior to maintenance therapy, all significant acute toxicity from consolidation therapy was to be resolved to ≤ grade 2. Subjects with CRi proceeded to maintenance therapy as per investigator's discretion and for CR subjects maintenance therapy began after hematologic recovery (ANC ≥ 1000/μL, platelet count ≥ 100,000/μL) from remission consolidation, and at least 3 days after the last dose of midostaurin during consolidation. Subjects who were unable to complete four courses of HiDAC consolidation because of toxicity could still be eligible for maintenance therapy at the discretion of the principal investigator after the last dose of consolidation after recovery from hematologic and other significant acute toxicity. A bone marrow examination was to be performed prior to the first maintenance and every 3 months during Maintenance phase. Maintenance phase was up to 12 cycles of maintenance therapy with single-agent midostaurin or until relapse, unacceptable toxicity, or death, physician's decision, subject/guardian's decision, protocol deviation, study termination by sponsor, lost to follow-up, technical problems, pregnancy, subject withdrew consent or until the end of study, whichever event occured first.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Midostaurin
Patients went through 3 phases:
Induction phase - Day (D)8 to D28 in combination with standard of care (7+3 or 5+2 chemotherapy) up to 2 cycles; Consolidation phase - D8 to D28 in combination with cytarabine up to 4 cycles; Maintenance phase - D1 to D28 up to 12 cycles
Midostaurin
Induction Phase: 50 mg (two 25 mg capsules) twice a day by mouth on days 8-28, for 1 - 2 cycles; a cycle = 28 days; Consolidation Phase: 50 mg (two 25 mg capsules) twice a day by mouth on days 8-28, for up to 4 cycles; Maintenance Phase: Continuous dosing (days 1 - 28) for up yo 12 cycles or until relapse, unacceptable toxicity, death, physician's decision, subject/guardian decision, protocol deviation, study termination by Sponsor, lost to follow-up, technical problems, pregnancy, subject withdrew consent, or until the end of study, whichever event occurred first.
Cytarabine
Induction Phase (standard dose) (7 + 3 arm): 100-200 mg/m2/day by Continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) days 1-7 (168 hours infusion); Induction Phase (5 + 2 arm): 100 mg/m2/day by CIVI days 1-5; Consolidation Phase: 1-3 g/m2 infusion over 3 hours every 12 h on days 1, 3 and 5, up to 4 cycles based on age and per investigator discretion
anthracycline ((daunorubicin or idarubicin): Induction Phase only
daunorubicin (7 + 3 arm): 60-90 mg/m2/day by IV push on days 1-3 (with standard-dose cytarabine); daunorubicin (5 + 2 arm): 60 mg/m2/day by IV push on days 1-2; idarubicin (7 + 3 arm): 12 mg/m2/day by IV push on days 1-3 (with standard-dose cytarabine); idarubicin (5 + 2 arm): 12 mg/m2/day by IV push on days 1-2
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Midostaurin
Induction Phase: 50 mg (two 25 mg capsules) twice a day by mouth on days 8-28, for 1 - 2 cycles; a cycle = 28 days; Consolidation Phase: 50 mg (two 25 mg capsules) twice a day by mouth on days 8-28, for up to 4 cycles; Maintenance Phase: Continuous dosing (days 1 - 28) for up yo 12 cycles or until relapse, unacceptable toxicity, death, physician's decision, subject/guardian decision, protocol deviation, study termination by Sponsor, lost to follow-up, technical problems, pregnancy, subject withdrew consent, or until the end of study, whichever event occurred first.
Cytarabine
Induction Phase (standard dose) (7 + 3 arm): 100-200 mg/m2/day by Continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) days 1-7 (168 hours infusion); Induction Phase (5 + 2 arm): 100 mg/m2/day by CIVI days 1-5; Consolidation Phase: 1-3 g/m2 infusion over 3 hours every 12 h on days 1, 3 and 5, up to 4 cycles based on age and per investigator discretion
anthracycline ((daunorubicin or idarubicin): Induction Phase only
daunorubicin (7 + 3 arm): 60-90 mg/m2/day by IV push on days 1-3 (with standard-dose cytarabine); daunorubicin (5 + 2 arm): 60 mg/m2/day by IV push on days 1-2; idarubicin (7 + 3 arm): 12 mg/m2/day by IV push on days 1-3 (with standard-dose cytarabine); idarubicin (5 + 2 arm): 12 mg/m2/day by IV push on days 1-2
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Written informed consent must be obtained prior to any screening procedures.
2. Patients must be 18 years of age or older at the time of signing informed consent.
3. Patients must have a documented unequivocal diagnosis of AML according to WHO 2008 classification. A bone marrow or blood blast count of ≥ 20% is required, except for AML with t(15;17), t(8;21), inv(16) or t(16;16) where blast count may be \<20%, and, excluding M3 (acute promyelocytic leukemia).
4. Patients with secondary AML are eligible, e.g. patients with antecedent history of treatment for prior malignancy. AML patients with a history of antecedent treatment for myelodysplasia (MDS), e.g. azacitidine or decitabine, remain eligible for treatment on this study. These agents must have been discontinued for a period of at least 30 days or 5 half-lives of the drug (whichever is greater) before midostaurin can be administered.
5. Patients must have started "7+3" or "5+2" first induction chemotherapy regimen.
6. Patients must have a documented FLT3 mutation (ITD or TKD).).
7. Patients must have an ECOG Performance Status of ≤ 2
8. Patients requiring intrathecal chemotherapy must have a minimum washout of 48 hours prior to the first dose of midostaurin
9. Patients must have Total Bilirubin ≤ 2.5 x ULN
10. Patients must have Serum Creatinine ≤ 2.5 x ULN
11. Patients must be able to communicate well with the investigator to understand and comply with the requirements of the study
12. Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test before starting use of midostaurin.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Prior therapy for AML with the following exceptions:
1. emergency leukapheresis
2. emergency treatment for hyperleukocytosis with hydroxyurea for ≤ 7 days
3. cranial RT for CNS leukostasis (one dose only)
4. growth factor/cytokine support
2. Patients with LVEF less than 45% (by echocardiogram or MUGA) or symptomatic congestive heart failure (Class III or IV) according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification
3. Patients with any pulmonary infiltrate including those suspected to be of infectious origin (unless resolved to ≤ Grade 1 within screening timeframe)
4. Patients with any uncontrolled illness, including, but not limited to, acute or chronic pancreatitis or uncontrolled infection
5. QTc \>470 msec on screening ECG.
6. History of hypersensitivity to any drugs or metabolites of similar chemical classes as the study treatment.
7. Participation in a prior investigational interventional (drug) study with administration of the investigational product within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the investigational product, whichever is longer.
8. Pregnancy statements and contraception requirements:
Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception during dosing and for at least 4 months after stopping medication. Highly effective contraception methods include:
* Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject). Periodic abstinence (e.g. calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception
* Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy, or tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking study treatment. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment
* Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). The vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that subject
* Use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or placement of an intrauterine device or intrauterine system, or other forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate \<1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception.
In case of use of oral contraception women should also add a barrier method of contraception, particularly as it is currently unknown whether midostaurin may reduce the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives.
Sexually-active males unless they use a condom during intercourse with females of reproductive potential or pregnant women and for at least 4 months after stopping treatment to avoid conception or embryo-fetal harm.
9. Patients enrolled in this study are not permitted to participate in additional parallel study drug or device studies.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novartis Investigative Site
Pleven, , Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, , Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, , Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Varna, , Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Zagreb, , Croatia
Novartis Investigative Site
Brno, , Czechia
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, , Czechia
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallinn, , Estonia
Novartis Investigative Site
Helsinki, , Finland
Novartis Investigative Site
Oulu, , Finland
Novartis Investigative Site
Tampere, , Finland
Novartis Investigative Site
Bayonne, Bayonne Cedex, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Priest En Jarez, Pays de la Loire Region, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Besançon, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Clamart, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Créteil, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Dijon, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Limoges, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Lyon, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Metz, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Nice, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Pierre-Bénite, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Poitiers, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Villejuif, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, , Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Szeged, , Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Ancona, AN, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Avellino, AV, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Bergamo, BG, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Bologna, BO, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Brescia, BS, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Cuneo, CN, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Cosenza, CS, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Florence, FI, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Genova, GE, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Lecce, LE, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Latina, LT, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Monza, MB, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Rozzano, MI, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Modena, MO, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Palermo, PA, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Piacenza, PC, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Padua, PD, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Pescara, PE, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Perugia, PG, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Parma, PR, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Salerno, SA, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Siena, SI, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Torino, TO, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Venezia, VE, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Verona, VR, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Napoli, , Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Napoli, , Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Vilnius, , Lithuania
Novartis Investigative Site
Bergen, , Norway
Novartis Investigative Site
Craiova, , Romania
Novartis Investigative Site
Iași, , Romania
Novartis Investigative Site
Belgrade, , Serbia
Novartis Investigative Site
Bratislava, Slovak Republic, Slovakia
Novartis Investigative Site
Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia
Novartis Investigative Site
Bratislava, , Slovakia
Novartis Investigative Site
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, , Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
León, , Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, , Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, , Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Valencia, , Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Borås, , Sweden
Novartis Investigative Site
Uppsala, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sierra J, Montesinos P, Thomas X, Griskevicius L, Cluzeau T, Caillot D, Legrand O, Minotti C, Luppi M, Farkas F, Bengoudifa BR, Gilotti G, Hodzic S, Rambaldi A, Venditti A. Midostaurin plus daunorubicin or idarubicin for young and older adults with FLT3-mutated AML: a phase 3b trial. Blood Adv. 2023 Nov 14;7(21):6441-6450. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023009847.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Plain Language Trial Summary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-004440-12
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CPKC412A2408
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.