Comparison of Two Treatment Regimens in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes After Short-term Intensive Insulin Therapy
NCT ID: NCT03359837
Last Updated: 2022-04-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
384 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-20
2020-06-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To test the hypothesis that basal insulin based treatment (G+) is noninferior to twice-daily premixed insulin (PM-2) in term of hemoglobin A1c (glycosylated hemoglobin, HbA1c) reduction from baseline to end of study. The test for superiority can be done if noninferiority is achieved.
Secondary Objectives:
* To assess efficacy in terms of percentage of patients achieving HbA1c \<7% and HbA1c \<7% without hypoglycemia.
* To assess efficacy in terms of percentage of patients achieving fasting plasma glucose (FPG) \<7 mmol/L and FPG \<7 mmol/L without hypoglycemia.
* To assess safety in term of occurrence of moderate/severe hypoglycemia.
* To assess daily blood glucose (BG) variation.
* To assess patient satisfaction.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Research Study to Compare Two Types of Insulin: Insulin 287 and Insulin Glargine in People With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Not Used Insulin Before
NCT03951805
Study to Optimize Insulin Treatment by Basal Regimen With Insulin Glargine in Type-2-Diabetic Patients Previously Uncontrolled on Premixed Insulin
NCT00693771
A 38 Week Trial Comparing Effect and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart vs. Insulin Glargine Plus Insulin Aspart in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin With or Without Oral Antidiabetic Treatment in Need of Treatment Intensification
NCT02906917
Insulin Glargine in Type 2 Diabetic Patients
NCT00347100
Comparison of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Versus Insulin Glargine Both in Combination With Metformin and Glimepiride in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00469092
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Glargine based therapy
Once daily glargine plus prandial oral anti-hyperglycemic drugs
INSULIN GLARGINE (HOE901)
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection
Route of administration: subcutaneous injection
Insulin Glulisine
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection
Route of administration: subcutaneous injection
Repaglinide
Pharmaceutical form: tablet
Route of administration: oral administration
Acarbose
Pharmaceutical form: tablet
Route of administration: oral administration
Premixed insulin
Twice daily premixed insulin
Biphasic insulin aspart 30
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection
Route of administration: subcutaneous injection
Metformin
Pharmaceutical form: tablet or capsule
Route of administration: oral administration
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
INSULIN GLARGINE (HOE901)
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection
Route of administration: subcutaneous injection
Insulin Glulisine
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection
Route of administration: subcutaneous injection
Biphasic insulin aspart 30
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection
Route of administration: subcutaneous injection
Repaglinide
Pharmaceutical form: tablet
Route of administration: oral administration
Acarbose
Pharmaceutical form: tablet
Route of administration: oral administration
Metformin
Pharmaceutical form: tablet or capsule
Route of administration: oral administration
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Hemoglobin A1c\>7.5%, and ≤11%.
* Fasting plasma glucose \>7 mmol/L.
* Fasting C peptide \>1 ng/mL.
* Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients with diabetes diagnosis between 2 and 10 years (World Health Organization 1999 T2DM diagnose criteria).
* Continuous treatment with stable doses of metformin (≥1 g/day) and 1 oral antihyperglycemic drug (at least half maximum dose) for more than 3 months prior to screening.
* Body mass index ≥21 kg/m2, and \<40 kg/m2.
Exclusion Criteria
* Diabetes other than T2DM (e.g. type 1 diabetes, diabetes secondary to pancreatic disorders, drug or chemical agent intake).
* History of hypoglycemia unawareness or recurrent hypoglycemia or severe hypoglycemia within the past 12 months.
* History of sensitivity to the study drugs or to drugs with a similar chemical structure.
* Pregnancy or planned pregnancy or current lactation (women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at study entry and a medically approved contraception method).
* Acute diabetic complications (diabetic ketoacidosis, lactic acidosis, hyperosmolar nonketotic diabetic coma) within the past 12 months.
* Significant diabetic complications and serious disease, e.g., symptomatic autonomic neuropathy, gastroparesis, unstable angina or active proliferative retinopathy.
* Acute infections which may affect BG control within the past 4 weeks.
* Active liver disease, alanine transaminase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) greater than two times the upper limit of the reference range at screening.
* Impaired renal function, defined as but not limited to, serum creatinine levels ≥1.5 mg/dL (132 μmol/L) for males and ≥1.4 mg/dL (123 μmol/L) for females or presence of macroproteinuria (\>2 g/day).
The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sanofi
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clinical Sciences & Operations
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Sanofi
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHINA
China, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Liu J, Jiang X, Xu B, Wang G, Cui N, Zhang X, Liu J, Mu Y, Guo L. Efficacy and Safety of Basal Insulin-Based Treatment Versus Twice-Daily Premixed Insulin After Short-Term Intensive Insulin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (BEYOND V). Adv Ther. 2020 Apr;37(4):1675-1687. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01265-6. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U1111-1186-3400
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
LANTUL07194
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.