Study: C-Collar and Dysphagia

NCT ID: NCT03349125

Last Updated: 2019-10-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-17

Study Completion Date

2018-04-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to characterize oral-pharyngeal swallow function with the guidance of videofluoroscopy under two conditions, with and without cervical bracing, in patients determined to have dysphagia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

According to the National Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, 12,000 patients experience acute spinal cord injury (SCI) in the United States annually. It is reported that 16% to 55% of patients with a cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) present with dysphagia which compromises their ability to eat and drink safely as well as their quality of life. Based on previous research, Dysphagia can also result in respiratory complications, particularly pneumonia, which is the most common cause of death in cervical SCI patients. The contribution of swallowing impairment, and associated aspiration risks, to respiratory illnesses and mortality in patients with SCI are unknown. As a first step, the investigators will identify the nature (type of swallowing impairment such as swallow delay, pharyngeal residue, penetration or aspiration) and frequency of occurrence of swallowing impairments in elderly patients with injury to the cervical spinal region. Further, the investigators will determine the effects of standard medical care, specifically, surgical bracing, on swallow function in patients post-cervical SCI.

Patients with SCI present with a range of impairments in the oral and pharyngeal phases of the swallow. These result both from the effects of trauma and medical/surgical management of injury on anatomy and physiology of the swallow mechanism. Earlier studies postulate that Acute SCI can result in reduced base of tongue movement, delayed pharyngeal swallow response, decreased hyolaryngeal excursion with subsequent decrease in cricopharyngeal opening, and pharyngeal wall dysfunction. These swallowing impairments are particularly devastating in older patients who lack the functional reserve to overcome these neuroanatomical insults. Consequently, there is an increased prevalence of dysphagia in the elderly patients with SCI.

Medical and surgical management of SCI can also negatively impact swallow function. Many patients will require neck immobilization following injury. Neck extension, chin or head retraction secondary to cervical bracing may increase the risk or severity of dysphagia by changing the mechanics of swallowing. In addition, fixation at a ninety-degree angle limits the natural flexion or range of movement a patient employs during deglutition. Studies have found that cervical orthoses impacts swallowing physiology in healthy adults. An earlier study reported changes in point of initiation of the swallow, laryngeal penetration, pharyngeal residue and hyoid bone movement. One would expect changes to be more significant in patients with dysphagia, and likely more remarkable in the elderly population who unfortunately, have the highest incidence of cervical SCI. Given the risk factors for dysphagia and pulmonary complications in this population, it is imperative that thorough evaluation of oral-pharyngeal swallow function be completed. However, there is little research addressing the impact of cervical bracing on patients with dysphagia at any age. The study team here aims to determine if cervical bracing contributes to severity of dysphagia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dysphagia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Collar On

Individuals who have been referred for videoflouroscopic swallow study (VFSS) as per standard of care, with a stable cervical injury, will have trials of liquids and solids with the Cervical Brace (Collar) on.

Collar On

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Collar Off

Individuals who have been referred for videoflouroscopic swallow study (VFSS) as per standard of care, with a stable cervical injury, will have trials of liquids and solids with the Cervical Brace (Collar) off.

Collar Off

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Collar On

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Collar Off

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Inpatients receiving treatment for a spine injury
2. Treating physician's approval that cervical cervical spinal column injury is stable
3. Approval for collar removal by treating physician during VFSS
4. Adults 60 and over.
5. All races.
6. Males and females.
7. Glasgow coma scale of 13 or greater.

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia.
2. Neurologic disorders associated with dysphagia including dementia, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and ALS.
3. Pharyngeal/laryngeal surgery or head/neck radiation treatment.
4. Glasgow coma scale of less than 13 at time of evaluation.
5. Patient's with a tracheotomy.
6. Barium intolerance.
7. Patients who lack the capacity to consent on their own behalf
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Wisconsin, Madison

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jodi Hernandez, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Wisconsin - Madison

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A539772

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SMPH/SURGERY/SURGERY*SP

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2017-0222

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.