Progressive Modular Rebalancing (RMP) System Rehabilitation Combined With Sensory Cues for Rehabilitation of Patients With PD

NCT ID: NCT03346265

Last Updated: 2017-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

47 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-31

Study Completion Date

2017-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the present study, the investigators propose a rehabilitative program for Parkinson' disease based on the combination of a neurocognitive method, i.e. visual sensory cues, with a neurophysiological method, i.e. RMP, in a randomized controlled trial with cross-over. The rationale herein was that the RMP may globally improve patients in terms of trunk control, motor performance, muscle tone, endurance and so on, predisposing them to improvement of the gait rhythm and automaticity induced by use of the visual external cues.

The primary aim of this pilot, randomized, controlled, trial with crossover was to establish whether a 8-week exercise program focused at improving gait in people with PD was more effective than a same-duration program of standard physiotherapy. The secondary aim was to evaluate the effect on the disease's severity. At this aims investigators used a quantitative 3D motion analysis system to evaluate gait parameters and UPDRS-II and UPDR-III and H-Y staging to evaluate the severity of the disease.

The investigators hypothesised that the both exercise programs will improve standard physiotherapy, however the proposed program will yield better improvements for the people with PD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a pilot, bi-centric, exploratory, randomized, controlled, crossover design with blind observer .

Subjects participated in a baseline assessment session (T0, before rehabilitative treatment), followed by random allocation to 8 weeks of rehabilitative treatments (A or B) (T1), followed by 1 month of inactivity wash out period. Following this wash-out period, patients who received treatment A switched to the treatment B and viceversa. A computerized randomization schedule was generated on the computer and held by an investigator not involved in subject recruitment or assessment.

Both clinical (neurological visit and scale administration) and instrumental (gait analysis) assessments were carried out 3 times: at baseline before rehabilitative treatment (T0), 4 weeks (T1, intermediate evaluation) and 8 weeks after rehabilitative treatments (T2, final evaluation). Medication was kept constant throughout the trial, and all interventions were performed at the same time of day for each patient during ON phase.

Participants were asked to maintain their pre-enrollment activity level and current medication dosage when not in the laboratory.

Assessors, for both clinical and instrumental evaluations, were blinded to the allocation treatment.

During the inactive condition, participants received usual care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson Disease Movement Disorders

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

progressive modular rebalancing PMR visual sensory cues SC Parkinson Disease Movement Disorders Parkinson rehabilitation neurocognitive method motor performance improving gait physiotherapy 3D motion analysis system improvements

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Subjects participated in a baseline assessment session (T0, before rehabilitative treatment), followed by random allocation to 8 weeks of rehabilitative treatments (A or B) (T1), followed by 1 month of inactivity wash out period. Following this wash-out period, patients who received treatment A switched to the treatment B and viceversa. A computerized randomization schedule was generated on the computer and held by an investigator not involved in subject recruitment or assessment.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

Treatment A consisted in a combined exercise program of 40 min duration RMP (Monari, 2004; Monari et al., 2016) and 20 min duration of gait training with sensory cues.

RMP. RMP protocol was based on lengthening and muscular recruitment exercises by means of complex motor skills involving muscular kinetic chains in lower limbs and trunk. Each session was divided into muscular stretching exercise, aiming to increase step length and rotating trunk movements, and tailored progressive exercise therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Treatment A combined exercise program and gait training with sensory cues

Intervention Type OTHER

Treatment A consisted in a combined exercise program of 40 min duration RMP

Group B

Treatment B Conventional physiotherapy was composed of 4 sections of exercises, chiefly oriented to different body structures appropriate to movement (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health code): trunk (s760), pelvis (s750), lower extremity (s750), and upper extremity (s730) including shoulder region (s720). Domains focused on were (1) warm-up exercises, (2) trunk mobility exercises, (3) postural stability (b715), and (4) transferring oneself (d420) and changing body positions (d410).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Treatment B Conventional physiotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional physiotherapy was composed of 4 sections of exercises, chiefly oriented to different body structures appropriate to movement (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health code)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Treatment A combined exercise program and gait training with sensory cues

Treatment A consisted in a combined exercise program of 40 min duration RMP

Intervention Type OTHER

Treatment B Conventional physiotherapy

Conventional physiotherapy was composed of 4 sections of exercises, chiefly oriented to different body structures appropriate to movement (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health code)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* diagnosis of idiopathic PD according to UK bank criteria
* Hoehn and Yahr stages 1 to 3.
* United Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) gait subscore of 1 or more, no change in medication during the study period.
* All patients were in a stable drug program and had adapted to their current medications for at least 2 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria

* cognitive deficits (defined as scores of \<26 on the Mini-Mental State Examination \[MMSE\]),
* moderate or severe depression (defined as scores of \>17 on the Beck Depression Inventory \[BDI\]),
* orthopedic and other gait-influencing diseases such as arthrosis or total hip joint replacement.
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

76 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Roma La Sapienza

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mariano Serrao

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mariano Serrao, PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Università "La Sapienza di Roma"

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Policlinico Italia Srl

Rome, Lazio, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Keus SH, Munneke M, Nijkrake MJ, Kwakkel G, Bloem BR. Physical therapy in Parkinson's disease: evolution and future challenges. Mov Disord. 2009 Jan 15;24(1):1-14. doi: 10.1002/mds.22141.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18946880 (View on PubMed)

Cassimatis C, Liu KP, Fahey P, Bissett M. The effectiveness of external sensory cues in improving functional performance in individuals with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2016 Sep;39(3):211-8. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000171.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27119224 (View on PubMed)

Westwater-Wood S, Adams N, Kerry R (2010): The use of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in physiotherapy practice Physical Therapy Reviews Vol.15 No.1,p23-27

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kabat H, Knapp ME (1943) The use of prostigmine in the treatment of poliomyelitis. JAMA 122: 989-995.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hove MJ, Keller PE. Impaired movement timing in neurological disorders: rehabilitation and treatment strategies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1337(1):111-7. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12615.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25773624 (View on PubMed)

Kisner, Carolyn & Colby, Lynn A. (2012):

Reference Type BACKGROUND

LEVINE MG, KABAT H. Proprioceptive facilitation of voluntary motion in man. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1953 Mar;117(3):199-211. doi: 10.1097/00005053-195303000-00002. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 13070034 (View on PubMed)

Monari G (2004) FNP, Facilitazioni Neurocinetiche Progressive. Elaborazione del concetto Kabat. Edi Ermes.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Monari G (2013) RMP, Riequilibrio Modulare Progressivo. Elaborazione concetto Kabat. Edi Ermes

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Richards CL, Malouin F, Bedard PJ, Cioni M. Changes induced by L-DOPA and sensory cues on the gait of parkinsonian patients In: Woollacott M, Horak F, editors. Posture and gait: control mechanisms. XIth International Symposium of the Society for Postural and Gait Research, Portland, May 24-27, 1992. University of Oregon Books; 1992, p. 126-129.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Marek SM, Cramer JT, Fincher AL, Massey LL, Dangelmaier SM, Purkayastha S, Fitz KA, Culbertson JY. Acute Effects of Static and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching on Muscle Strength and Power Output. J Athl Train. 2005 Jun;40(2):94-103.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15970955 (View on PubMed)

Sharman MJ, Cresswell AG, Riek S. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching : mechanisms and clinical implications. Sports Med. 2006;36(11):929-39. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636110-00002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17052131 (View on PubMed)

McAtee RE, Charland J. Facilitated stretching: assisted and unassisted PNF stretching made easy. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1999

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kisner & Colby, p208,(2012)

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kisner & Colby 2012, p208

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Nagarwal, A.K., Zutshi K., Ram C.S., Zafar R.(2010). Improvement of hamstring flexibility: A comparison between two PNFstretching techniques. International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering.4 (2010) 1, pp 025-033

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Surburg PR, Schrader JW. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques in sports medicine: a reassessment. J Athl Train. 1997 Jan;32(1):34-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16558430 (View on PubMed)

Feland JB, Marin HN. Effect of submaximal contraction intensity in contract-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching. Br J Sports Med. 2004 Aug;38(4):E18. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.010967.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15273211 (View on PubMed)

Ford P, McChesney J. Duration of maintained hamstring ROM following termination of three stretching protocols. J Sport Rehabil. 2007 Feb;16(1):18-27. doi: 10.1123/jsr.16.1.18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17699884 (View on PubMed)

Nagarwal, A.K., Zutshi K., Ram C.S., Zafar R. (2010). Improvement of hamstring flexibility: A comparison between two PNF stretching techniques. International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering. 4 (2010) 1, pp 025-033.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kavanagh J, Barrett R, Morrison S. The role of the neck and trunk in facilitating head stability during walking. Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jul;172(4):454-63. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0353-6. Epub 2006 Feb 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16489437 (View on PubMed)

Serrao M, Pierelli F, Sinibaldi E, Chini G, Castiglia SF, Priori M, Gimma D, Sellitto G, Ranavolo A, Conte C, Bartolo M, Monari G. Progressive Modular Rebalancing System and Visual Cueing for Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot, Randomized, Controlled Trial With Crossover. Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 29;10:902. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00902. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31543859 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

s002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id