Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of BAF312 Compared to Placebo in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH).
NCT ID: NCT03338998
Last Updated: 2022-08-12
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-12-24
2020-05-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Simvastatin For Intracerebral Hemorrhage Study
NCT00718328
Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of Balovaptan in Participants With Acute Ischemic Stroke at a High Risk of Developing Malignant Brain Edema
NCT05399550
Effect of Natalizumab on Infarct Volume in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT01955707
Repinotan in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT00044915
Safety and Tolerability of PF-05230907 in Intracerebral Hemorrhage
NCT02687191
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
ICH patients meeting study criteria were randomized at 1:1 ratio into either active or placebo group. Patients received an intravenous infusion (i.v.) treatment within 24 hours of an ICH event and were up titrated for 7 days. Following the i.v. treatment, participants received 10 mg BAF312 or placebo in tablet form (taken daily orally) for an additional 7 days. Participants were followed for an additional 76 days after treatment for neurological and safety conditions during three clinic visits.
Recruitment for the trial was put on hold due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Thirty-two patients had been enrolled in the trial and completed the protocol as planned. After seven months of the trial being on hold, an Interim analysis was conducted and reviewed by the Data Monitoring Committee. Novartis terminated the trial due to lack of potential efficacy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
BAF312
Days 1 - 7, IV up titration; days 8 - 14, 10 mg (5 x 2 mg tablets) taken daily orally
BAF312 solution
Solution for intravenous (IV) infusion - 4.5mg/4.5mL
BAF312 tablet
2 mg film-coated tablet
Placebo
Days 1 - 7, IV up titration; days 8 - 14, 10 mg (5 x 2 mg tablets) taken daily orally - matching placebo
Matching Placebo for BAF312 solution
Solution for intravenous (IV) infusion - 0mg/4.5mL matching placebo
Matching Placebo for BAF312 tablet
0 mg film-coated tablet matching placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
BAF312 solution
Solution for intravenous (IV) infusion - 4.5mg/4.5mL
Matching Placebo for BAF312 solution
Solution for intravenous (IV) infusion - 0mg/4.5mL matching placebo
BAF312 tablet
2 mg film-coated tablet
Matching Placebo for BAF312 tablet
0 mg film-coated tablet matching placebo
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Male or female patients aged 18 to 85 years (inclusive).
2. Written informed consent obtained before any study assessment is performed. If the patient is not able to give the informed consent personally, consent by a relative or legal representative is acceptable.
3. Spontaneous, supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage in cerebral cortex or deep brain structures (putamen, thalamus, caudate, and associated deep white matter tracts) with a volume ≥ 10 mL but ≤ 60 mL (calculated by the ABC/2 method, after Kothari et al 1996) determined by routine clinical MRI or CT.
4. Patients with the onset of ICH witnessed and/or last seen healthy no longer than 24 hrs previously.
5. Patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) best motor score no less than 5 (brings hands above clavicle on stimulus to head or neck).
Exclusion Criteria
1. Use of other investigational drugs within 5 half-lives of enrollment, or until the expected pharmacodynamic effect has returned to baseline (for biologics), whichever is longer.
2. History of hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or to drugs of similar chemical classes (e.g., fingolimod).
3. Current use of concomitant medications with potent CYP2C9/3A4 inhibitory or induction potential.
4. Infratentorial (midbrain, pons, medulla, or cerebellum) ICH.
5. Candidates for surgical hematoma evacuation or other urgent surgical intervention (i.e., surgical relief of increased intracranial pressure) on initial presentation. If during the treatment period surgical hematoma evacuation or surgical intervention to lower intracranial pressure becomes indicated, the investigational treatment should be stopped.
6. Patients with intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) having a Graeb score of \>3 on initial presentation. Patients must not have blood in the 4th ventricle and may only have blood in the 3rd ventricle in the absence of ventricular expansion. Trace or mild hemorrhage in either or both lateral ventricles is permitted. Patients with hydrocephalus determined radiologically on initial presentation are excluded regardless of Graeb score.
7. Secondary ICH due to:
* aneurysm
* brain tumor
* arteriovenous malformation
* thrombocytopenia, defined as platelet count of \<150,000/µl
* known history of coagulopathy
* acute sepsis
* traumatic brain injury (TBI)
* disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)
8. Prior disability due to other disease compromising mRS evaluation, thereby interfering with the primary outcome, operationally defined as an estimated mRS score (by history) of ≥ 3 before ICH for patients less than or equal to 80 years of age. For ICH patients 81-85 years of age, estimated mRS by history prior to ICH must be less than or equal to 1 (no significant disability despite symptoms).
9. Preexisting unstable epilepsy.
10. Patients with active systemic bacterial, viral or fungal infections.
* Intravenous immunoglobulin, immunosuppressive and/or chemotherapeutic medications.
* Moderate immunosuppressives (e.g. azathioprine, methotrexate) and/or fingolimod within 2 months prior to randomization.
* Stronger immunosuppressives (e.g. cyclophosphamide, immunosuppressive mAb) within (minimally) 6 months prior to randomization, or longer with long-lasting immunosuppressive medications as determined by the investigator.
* Cardiac conduction or rhythm disorders including sinus arrest or sino-atrial block, heart rate \<50 bpm, sick-sinus syndrome, Mobitz Type II second degree AV block or higher grade AV block, or preexisting atrial fibrillation (either by history or observed at screening).
* PR interval \>220 msec. Long QT syndrome or QTcF prolongation \>450 msec in males or \>470 msec in females on screening electrocardiogram (ECG).
* Patients receiving treatment with QT-prolonging drugs having a long half-life (e.g., amiodarone).
13. Any of the following abnormal laboratory values prior to randomization:
* White blood cell (WBC) count \< 2,000/μl (\< 2.0 x 109/L)
* Lymphocyte count \< 800/μl (\< 0.8 x 109/L)
14. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive hCG laboratory test.
15. Patients with any other medically unstable condition or serious laboratory abnormality as determined by the investigator.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kevin N. Sheth, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yale University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novartis Investigative Site
Palo Alto, California, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Portland, Oregon, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Houston, Texas, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Houston, Texas, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on novctrd.com
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CBAF312X2207
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.