Prognostic Factors on Malignant Pleural Effusion

NCT ID: NCT03276715

Last Updated: 2018-10-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

233 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-01

Study Completion Date

2018-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Malignant pleural effusion can occur in up to half of the patients with metastatic disease. It can cause shortness of breath to patients and so far there is no protocol on its management.

The study is looking at patients with malignant pleural effusion and aims to identify its prognostic factors.

Pleural fluid and blood analysis will be performed as in the standard of care and results will be collected at the start of diagnosis. This will not affect subsequent management plan. Patients' disease course will be followed up and progress data will be collected. Data will then be analysed to identify relevant prognostic factors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is common, and is estimated to affect up to a half of patients with malignancy, either at the time or during subsequent clinical course after the diagnosis of malignancy. Lung cancer is the most common cause of MPE, followed by breast cancer, lymphoma, unknown primary genitourinary and gastrointestinal carcinoma. Pleural involvement indicates dissemination of malignancy and suggests a poorer prognosis and the median survival rate ranges from 3 to 12 months, with lung cancer showing the shortest survival among Caucasian cohorts. Patients with MPE frequently suffer from effusion related symptoms requiring therapeutic drainage. Conventionally, the options of therapeutic drainage of MPE include needle aspiration, and intercostal drain insertion with or without chemical pleurodesis. Needle aspiration allows quick relief of effusion and symptoms, though the volume of pleural effusion being aspirated with each attempt of needle puncture is limited to 1-1.5 litres, and repeated puncture involves risks of complications. Intercostal drain insertion will allow gradual drainage of large pleural effusion over days, but the shortcomings being the long hospitalization of at least a week, and the presence of trapped lung would preclude chemical pleurodesis for definitive fluid control. Up to 40% of MPE patients still require repeated pleural drainage procedure, even after Talc chemical pleurodesis. The much longer hospitalization period is considered unfavourable for patients with limited lifespan in terms of weeks or a few months, who would spend more time with their family. In recent few years, indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) has provided a relatively novel option of palliative MPE drainage, on an ambulatory out-patient setting. IPC has been reported to be cost-effective, in particular for patients with survival of less than 14 weeks. With the limited time span, it is important to balance between the aim of symptomatic relief and maintaining patient's quality of life. Invasive procedures and prolonged hospitalisation can cause great distress to patients. Predicted survival of patients with MPE would be important in informing the most suitable method for relieving MPE. Previous studies have identified relevant factors on prediction of survival in patients with malignant pleural effusion but so far, there is no data for Chinese patients. The LENT scoring system (pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, neutrophil -to-lymphocyte ratio and tumour type) is a new validated prognostic score in malignant pleural effusion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pleural Effusion, Malignant Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* malignant pleural effusion (MPE) due to lung cancer

Exclusion Criteria

* workup of MPE (pleural fluid results, blood test results, or treatment history) not available
* Patients unwilling to join study (for prospective recruitment)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lui Mei Sze

Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ka Yan Chiang, MBBS(HK)

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Queen Mary Hospital

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Clive AO, Kahan BC, Hooper CE, Bhatnagar R, Morley AJ, Zahan-Evans N, Bintcliffe OJ, Boshuizen RC, Fysh ET, Tobin CL, Medford AR, Harvey JE, van den Heuvel MM, Lee YC, Maskell NA. Predicting survival in malignant pleural effusion: development and validation of the LENT prognostic score. Thorax. 2014 Dec;69(12):1098-104. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205285. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25100651 (View on PubMed)

Anevlavis S, Kouliatsis G, Sotiriou I, Koukourakis MI, Archontogeorgis K, Karpathiou G, Giatromanolaki A, Froudarakis ME. Prognostic factors in patients presenting with pleural effusion revealing malignancy. Respiration. 2014;87(4):311-6. doi: 10.1159/000356764. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24457947 (View on PubMed)

Bielsa S, Salud A, Martinez M, Esquerda A, Martin A, Rodriguez-Panadero F, Porcel JM. Prognostic significance of pleural fluid data in patients with malignant effusion. Eur J Intern Med. 2008 Jul;19(5):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.09.014. Epub 2007 Nov 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18549935 (View on PubMed)

Thomas R, Francis R, Davies HE, Lee YC. Interventional therapies for malignant pleural effusions: the present and the future. Respirology. 2014 Aug;19(6):809-22. doi: 10.1111/resp.12328. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24947955 (View on PubMed)

Lui MM, Fitzgerald DB, Lee YC. Phenotyping malignant pleural effusions. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2016 Jul;22(4):350-5. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000267.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27055073 (View on PubMed)

Davies HE, Mishra EK, Kahan BC, Wrightson JM, Stanton AE, Guhan A, Davies CW, Grayez J, Harrison R, Prasad A, Crosthwaite N, Lee YC, Davies RJ, Miller RF, Rahman NM. Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2383-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5535.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22610520 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UW 16-307

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

BAL Fluid Biomarkers in Sarcoma
NCT06815666 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2