Influence of Two Different Flap Designs for Sinus Floor Elevation
NCT ID: NCT03272100
Last Updated: 2017-09-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
16 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-04-01
2017-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Sinus Augmentation: a Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT02117882
Sinus Lift: Saving Time and Reducing Morbidity
NCT02415946
Pilot Study on Safety and Efficacy of MD05 in Comparison With Beta-TCP in Patients Undergoing Sinus Floor Augmentation
NCT00520377
A Modified Sinus Floor Elevation Technique - a Pilot Study on 12 Patients
NCT02137824
Clinical Application Strategies of Maxillary Sinus Buccal Bony Window
NCT05315791
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
test side ( horizontal flap)
Horizontal incision was realised in alveolar mucosa, in order to obtain the exposure of the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus, thus accessing the sinus cavity
flap
after flap incision , the sinus cavity was opened and then the membrane raised up
control side ( standard flap)
Trapezoidal flap was realised, using a crestal incision and two deep vertical incisions extended in the fornix to expose the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus
flap
after flap incision , the sinus cavity was opened and then the membrane raised up
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
flap
after flap incision , the sinus cavity was opened and then the membrane raised up
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* residual bone height in the maxillary premolar and molar region less than 4mm
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Firenze and Siena, Napoli, Italy
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
nicola baldini
principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
marco ferrari, clinical director
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
tuscan school of dental medicine, university of Firenze and Siena
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Siena University, Department of Periodontology, Policlinico Le Scotte Siena.
Siena, , Italy
Tuscan School of Dentistry
Siena, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MSL001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.