Pilot Clinical Evaluation of the RHEA Vital Sign Vigilance System in Hospital Patients Patients

NCT ID: NCT03269643

Last Updated: 2019-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-01

Study Completion Date

2017-11-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study comparing both of the investigational device and reference device to gold standard Patient Monitor of the accuracy of heart rate and respiratory rate monitoring. The primary variables for the analysis of heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) are each the overall mean root mean square difference (RMSD). Results of the investigational device and reference device compared with the patient monitor are evaluated to see if there are equivalent. Motion and bed exit accuracy will be evaluated by comparing with the manual observation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The testing will be conducted in three periods. In the Accuracy Tests (periods

1 and 2), one of the contact-free devices will be used to monitor the HR and RR, while being compared with the Patient Monitor. The RHEA investigational device and reference device will be used to monitor the same subject at different times, as the sensors of the two devices are placed at a similar location of the bed. HR and RR will be recorded for all three devices.

The primary hypotheses for HR, are as follows:

Adults HO: μ = 3.25 vs. HA: μ \< 3.25, Children HO: μ = 3.5 vs. HA: μ \< 3.5,

The primary hypotheses for RR, are as follows:

Adults HO: μ = 2.25 vs. HA: μ \< 2.25, Children HO: μ = 2.5 vs. HA: μ \< 2.5, where μ represents the population mean HR or RR. If the upper bound of the confidence interval is less than the hypothesized value, the corresponding null hypothesis will be rejected. Comparison of the performance of the two contact-free devices will be performed on the recorded results via statistical analysis.

The hypothesis here is that the two devices have equivalent performance. The third test will assess the ability of the RHEA device to accurately detect motion on or exit from the bed, as compared to the manual observation. Motion and no motion accuracy will each be calculated along with their respective two-sided 95% confidence intervals.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vital Sign Monitoring

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

The RHEA device and Patient Monitor are used to monitor the heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) of participants at the same time in Test 1. The reference device and patient monitor are used to monitor the hear rate and respiratory rate of the same participant at the same time at Test 2. The two tests results will be compared and evaluated the accuracy of the two devices. And the RHEA device is used alone to evaluate the accuracy of motion and no motion.
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Investigational Group

The RHEA device and Patient Monitor Device are used to monitor the heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) of participants.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Investigational Group

Intervention Type DEVICE

The RHEA device and Philips Patient Monitor MX400 are used to monitor the heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) of participants.

Reference Group

The reference device and Patient Monitor Device are used to monitor the heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) of participants.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Reference group

Intervention Type DEVICE

The reference device Earlysense 2.0 system(vital sign monitoring system) and Philips Patient Monitor MX400 are used to monitor the heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) of participants.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Investigational Group

The RHEA device and Philips Patient Monitor MX400 are used to monitor the heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) of participants.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Reference group

The reference device Earlysense 2.0 system(vital sign monitoring system) and Philips Patient Monitor MX400 are used to monitor the heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) of participants.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female, 18 years old and above.
2. Provide written informed consent.
3. Weight ranging from 20 to 150 kg inclusive.
4. Are located in a non-ICU hospital setting.
5. Agree to not eat during the testing period.
6. Agree to keep still.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Are connected to a device which may interfere with the device monitoring in this study.
2. Are receiving any bedside care which may be incompatible with the study procedures.
3. Sleep apnea.
4. Pregnant or breastfeeding.
5. A likely need to receive or undergo a procedure during the testing period.
6. Cannot accept a nasal cannula, or have a monitor lead placed on the chest.
7. A significant medical condition in the judgement of the investigator, which may compromise the study testing procedures.
8. Are wearing pacemaker or defibrillator.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medstar Health Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Darma Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Arrel Olano, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medstar Health Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MedStar Health Research Institute, Inc.

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RHEA EL30-2017-003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The DistaSense VITALS Study
NCT07217327 RECRUITING