Device for Monitoring Pain During Intraoperative, Pre/Post Surgical Periods: Comparison With Standard of Care Monitoring

NCT ID: NCT02630134

Last Updated: 2017-07-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study patients are given a hand held device to track pain post surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The MyHealthTrends™ for Pain Tracking System is a revolutionary consumer-oriented pain monitoring system enabling individuals to record the pain participants experience with the click of a button. Developed by a doctor for the ultimate use within hospital and outpatient settings, MyHealthTrends™ for Pain enables anyone afflicted with pain to easily record their sensations - helping to acquire faster and superior diagnoses and treatment. Among the benefits of the MyHealthTrends™ for Pain Tracking System are that it enables patients to: i\] easily record the pain experienced in real-time - capturing accurate information; ii\] shift from memory-based descriptions of experienced pain to data-driven, time based recordings; iii\] provide objective evidence of the pain experienced.

It is extremely portable and convenient to carry, approximately the size of a modern automobile key. Since it can be uploaded to a confidential internet site by way of a computer, which site is then accessible to the physician, it provides various additional benefits. These include allowing the physician to: i\] identify breakthrough pain episodes; ii\] determine analgesic requirements with a real time detailed pain record; iii\] prescribe the appropriate regimen with confidence; and iv\] monitor pain levels experienced by the patient, free of distortion caused by memory biases and lapses.

The purpose of this study is to provide detailed and quantitative comparisons of the device's performance during a demanding clinical inpatient surgery episode, where standard pain monitoring and therapy are in use. The device is extremely easy to use involving merely the press of a button; and so it would not distract from any standard communication of pain symptoms, which the subject were inclined to convey. The device stores all information (time and date stamped) for downloading through a USB plug to a computer when the study is completed and the patient discharged.

Specifically, investigators will identify 40 post thoracotomy patients expected to receive a PCA or epidural for post op pain control at Tisch hospital. Patients will be given the device and asked to record their pain in the immediate post op period until discharge. The information obtained from the electronic diary will be correlated with pain records based on nurse's chart, administration of pain medication, VAS pain questionnaire instruments given daily to each patient, and call button utilization.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Measurement Assessment, Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Baeta

These patients receive the Baeta device and take it home.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

These patients receive the Baeta device and take it home

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

These patients receive the Baeta device and take it home

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 or older
* post thoracotomy with a consult placed to the acute pain service on post-op day 0 for management of a PCA or epidural
* mental status permits patient to reliably press a button to record pain or administer medications
* must be hemodynamically stable
* must be able to physically use the MyHealth trends diary (press a button)
* supplies written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* less than 18 years of age
* has any underlying or current medical condition, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with the use of the MyHealth trends device (e.g. severe psychosis, quadrapalegic, etc.)
* Subject necessitates ICU care
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NYU Langone Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Haile, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NYU School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NYU Langone Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gaertner J, Elsner F, Pollmann-Dahmen K, Radbruch L, Sabatowski R. Electronic pain diary: a randomized crossover study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Sep;28(3):259-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.12.017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15336338 (View on PubMed)

Marceau LD, Link C, Jamison RN, Carolan S. Electronic diaries as a tool to improve pain management: is there any evidence? Pain Med. 2007 Oct;8 Suppl 3:S101-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00374.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17877520 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11-00520

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Home Monitoring Study for Surgical Patients
NCT07231653 NOT_YET_RECRUITING