The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is Translated From English to Turkish and Assess the Validity and Reliability in Athletic Population Who Have Foot and Ankle Disorders.
NCT ID: NCT03259750
Last Updated: 2017-08-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
51 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-08-20
2015-07-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Translation and Reliability of FAAM-U
NCT05997797
Analysis of Balance and Functional Hop Tests in Athletes With Lower Extremity Injuries by Dual Task Study
NCT05484778
Increased Femoral Anteversion and Physical Performance
NCT05882981
Motor Imagery Training Football Players With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair
NCT06594497
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Tegner Activity Score
NCT06571240
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
professional athletes
athlete who volunteered in this study that should be a member of a professional sport team, All athletes must complete self reported outcome instrument (FAAM-T)
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Turkish version (FAAM-T) questionnaire
Self reported outcome instrument
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Turkish version (FAAM-T) questionnaire
Self reported outcome instrument
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age ranges must be 18-40 years old
3. Clinical diagnosis of ankle and foot injury
1. Acute condition
2. Chronic condition
4. Injuries must to happened in sport activities.
Exclusion Criteria
2. The history of surgery to the above-mentioned areas.
3. Coexisting musculoskeletal injuries in other body parts, or chronic conditions.
1. Systematic diseases
2. Neurological or vascular conditions.
3. Alcohol abuse
4. Psychiatric disorders
18 Years
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Serkan Usgu
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Serkan Usgu
Assistant Professor of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Serkan Usgu, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hasan Kalyoncu University
Yavuz Yakut, Prof
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hasan Kalyoncu University
Sıdıka Fatma Uygur, Prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cyprus International University
Gunseli Usgu, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hasan Kalyoncu University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hasan Kalyoncu University
Gaziantep, Şahinbey, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Li GZ, Ruiz Munoz M, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Oct;39(21):2182-2189. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1219772. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Nov;26(11):968-83. doi: 10.1177/107110070502601113.
Carcia CR, Martin RL, Drouin JM. Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):179-83. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.179.
Borloz S, Crevoisier X, Deriaz O, Ballabeni P, Martin RL, Luthi F. Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Feb 8;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-40.
Moreira TS, Magalhaes Lde C, Silva RD, Martin RL, Resende MA. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Dec;38(25):2479-90. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1137979. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
Hoch JM, Legner JL, Lorete C, Hoch MC. The Validity of the Quick-FAAM in Patients Seeking Treatment for an Acute or Subacute Foot or Ankle Health Condition. J Sport Rehabil. 2017 May 1;26(3):jsr.2016-0089. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2016-0089. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
Arunakul M, Arunakul P, Suesiritumrong C, Angthong C, Chernchujit B. Validity and Reliability of Thai Version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Subjective Form. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jun;98(6):561-7.
Weel H, Zwiers R, Azim D, Sierevelt IN, Haverkamp D, van Dijk CN, Kerkhoffs GM. Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1348-54. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3480-9. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
Uematsu D, Suzuki H, Sasaki S, Nagano Y, Shinozuka N, Sunagawa N, Fukubayashi T. Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure. J Athl Train. 2015 Jan;50(1):65-70. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.42. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Bravini E, Bargeri S, Moroso M, Plebani G, Ferriero G. [Foot and ankle ability measure: cross-cultural translation and validation of the Italian version of the ADL module (FAAM-I/ADL)]. Med Lav. 2014 Jul 15;105(5):357-65. Italian.
Donahue M, Simon J, Docherty CL. Critical review of self-reported functional ankle instability measures. Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Dec;32(12):1140-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.1140.
Martin RL, Irrgang JJ. A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Feb;37(2):72-84. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2403.
Arnold BL, Wright CJ, Ross SE. Functional ankle instability and health-related quality of life. J Athl Train. 2011 Nov-Dec;46(6):634-41. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.6.634.
Hoch JM, Druvenga B, Ferguson BA, Houston MN, Hoch MC. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Male and Female Collegiate Soccer Players During an Athletic Season. J Athl Train. 2015 Sep;50(9):930-6. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-50.5.03. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HEK09/103
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.