A Study of Dabigatran Etexilate as Primary Treatment of Malignancy Associated Venous Thromboembolism
NCT ID: NCT03240120
Last Updated: 2019-04-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
99 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-01
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This is a single armed trial of dabigatran in patients with malignancy associated VTE.
The target recruitment is 99 consecutive patients with active malignancy and newly diagnosed VTE (deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) in Queen Mary Hospital.
Tinzaparin 175 iu/kg daily will be started after the diagnosis of VTE is confirmed (duplex Doppler ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis, and computed tomography for pulmonary embolism), and a written consent is obtained. Patients will be switched to dabigatran 150mg twice daily from day 6 onwards. The first dose of dabigatran will be given within 2 hours before the time that the next dose of tinzaparin would have been due. Anticoagulation will be continued as long as malignancy is active. If patients achieve a complete remission of their underlying malignancies, dabigatran will be continued for 6 months further.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Twice-daily Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate in the Long Term Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic VTE
NCT00558259
Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin for 6 Month Treatment of Acute Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism
NCT00291330
Secondary Prevention of Venous Thrombo Embolism (VTE).
NCT00329238
The Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran Etexilate for the Treatment of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
NCT03217448
Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Versus LMWH +/- Warfarin for VTE in Cancer
NCT02744092
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has a number of inherent advantages over warfarin. It does not interact with chemotherapeutic agents, and dose titration is not necessary. Furthermore, the risks of both bleeding and breakthrough VTE are also lower with LMWH. However, the requirement of daily subcutaneous injection makes LWMH inconvenient to use. Most patients have difficulties continuing daily injection, partly owing to compliance issues, but also because an emaciated state in some patients makes subcutaneous injection painful. As the life expectancy of solid cancer patients is improved with novel treatment options, the choice of anticoagulation has become a major issue in the management of VTE in this patient population.
The main reason underlying the inferior performance of warfarin in oncology patients is difficult dose titration. Drug interaction and hepatic dysfunction are common in patients on chemotherapy. Frequent interruptions of warfarin for invasive procedures and chemotherapy-induced-thrombocytopenia also lead to fluctuations in anticoagulation level. As a result, highs risk of recurrence of VTE and bleeding were observed in cancer patients taking warfarin. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), on the other hand, may be an attractive alternative treatment to LMWH. They are administered at a fixed dose with predictable pharmacokinetics, so that therapeutic monitoring is not required. There is minimal food and drug interaction. They have been shown to be effective in the treatment of VTE in several pivotal randomized controlled trials in comparison with warfarin . However, their role in malignancy associated VTE is yet to be determined, because cancer patients were either excluded or very much underrepresented in these VTE treatment trials. Moreover, the non-inferiority of DOACs in VTE treatment was only demonstrated against warfarin, which is already shown to be suboptimal in oncology patients. A trial directly comparing DOACs with LMWH in malignancy associated VTE is therefore needed.
Dabigatran etexilate is an oral thrombin inhibitor. It was shown in the RECOVER study to be effective in treatment of VTE and it has a lower bleeding risk than warfarin. It is not metabolized by cytochrome P450 system and therefore, in contrast to other DOACs, concomitant administration of CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors is not a concern.
We propose this prospective single armed trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dabigatran in the treatment of malignancy associated VTE. We will compare the result with our historical control who were treated with LMWH.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dabigatran etexilate & Tinzaparin
Tinzaparin 175 iu/kg daily will be started after the diagnosis of VTE is confirmed dabigatran 150mg twice daily from Day 6 onward till 6 months after underlying disease remission.
Dabigatran etexilate
Pradaxa 150 mg hard capsules
Tinzaparin
Tinzaparin 175 iu/kg daily will be started after the diagnosis of VTE is confirmed
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dabigatran etexilate
Pradaxa 150 mg hard capsules
Tinzaparin
Tinzaparin 175 iu/kg daily will be started after the diagnosis of VTE is confirmed
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. have acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism with objective confirmation;
3. have active cancer, which is defined as a diagnosis of cancer other than basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of skin within six months before enrollment, any treatment for cancer within the previous six months or recurrent or metastatic cancer.
4. Female subjects of childbearing potential should be willing to use 2 methods of birth control or be surgically sterile, or abstain from heterosexual activity for the course of the study through 120 days after the last dose of study medication. Subjects of childbearing potential are those who have not been surgically sterilized or have not been free from menses for \> 1 year.
5. Male subjects should agree to use an adequate method of contraception starting with the first dose of study therapy through 120 days after the last dose of study therapy.
Exclusion Criteria
2. have life expectancy of less than 3 months;
3. have active bleeding, are at high risk of bleeding, or have contraindications to anticoagulant treatment;
4. receive thrombectomy or fibrinolytic agent to treat the current episode of VTE;
5. receive more than 72 hours pre-treatment with therapeutic dosages of anticoagulant treatment prior to randomization to treat the current VTE episode;
6. are already on long term oral anticoagulation;
7. are on low molecular weight heparin for indications other than VTE;
8. have platelet count of less than 100 x 109/L;
9. are on dual antiplatelet therapy;
10. have a serum creatinine level of more than 220 umol/L or have a calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) of less than 30 ml/min;
11. have alanine aminotransferase level more than 2 times the upper limit of normal range or cirrhosis;
12. have history of heparin induced thrombocytopenia;
13. are on treatment of potent inhibitors or inducers of P-glycoprotein.
14. Is pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive or father children within the projected duration of the trial, starting with the screening visit through 120 days after the last dose of trial treatment.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Eric W.C. Tse
Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gloria Hwang, MBBS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, , Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HKU-OTI-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.