Evaluating Evidence-Based Quality Improvement of Comprehensive Women's Health Care Implementation in Low-Performing VAs

NCT ID: NCT03238417

Last Updated: 2023-07-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-09

Study Completion Date

2020-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gaps in delivery of gender-sensitive comprehensive care have resulted in disparities in quality and patient experience among women seen in VA. VA policy action providing guidance on delivery of comprehensive healthcare services for women Veterans was disseminated nationally in 2010, followed by annual assessments and site visits evaluating local VA efforts. While substantial inroads have been made, policy implementation, even when leveraged by field-based women's health leaders, has not been uniformly successful in achieving delivery of comprehensive care by designated providers in gender-sensitive care environments that ensure women's privacy, dignity and safety, all tenets of the original guidance and the updated directive (2017).

Building on prior effectiveness of an evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) approach to tailoring VA's medical home model -- Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) -- to the needs of women Veterans, VA leaders in women's health adopted EBQI to help low-performing VAs systematically improve services.

The objectives of the resulting Partnered Evaluation Initiative (PEI) funded by VA's Quality Enhancement Research Initiative and VA Office of Women's Health were:

1. To evaluate barriers and facilitators to achieving delivery of comprehensive women's health care in the identified low-performing VAs;
2. To evaluate effectiveness of EBQI in supporting low-performing VA facilities achieve improved organizational features, provider/staff attitudes, quality of care, and patient experiences among women Veteran patients; and,
3. To evaluate contextual factors, local implementation processes, and organizational changes in the participating facilities over time.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Gaps in delivery of gender-sensitive comprehensive care have resulted in disparities in quality and patient experience among women seen in VA. VA policy action providing guidance on delivery of comprehensive healthcare services for women Veterans was disseminated nationally in 2010, followed by annual assessments and site visits evaluating local VA efforts. While substantial inroads have been made, policy implementation, even when leveraged by field-based women's health leaders, has not been uniformly successful in achieving delivery of comprehensive care by designated providers in gender-sensitive care environments that ensure women's privacy, dignity and safety, all tenets of the original guidance and the updated VA directive (2017).

In collaboration with VA Women's Health Services (WHS), VA researchers developed a series of studies to better understand and help improve comprehensive care implementation through the Women Veterans' Healthcare CREATE Initiative. Among these, one focused on testing an evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) approach to tailoring VA's medical home model -- Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) -- to the needs of women Veterans, which has yielded significant local improvements in women Veterans' care. EBQI emphasizes a multilevel partnered approach to building capacity for innovation, implementation and spread of evidence-based practice. With its demonstrated success in the CREATE PACT study and several other EBQI trials, WHS adopted EBQI as a strategy to help low-performing VA facilities systematically improve services.

The objectives of the WHS/QUERI Partnered Evaluation Initiative that this project represents are:

1. To evaluate the barriers and facilitators to achieving delivery of comprehensive women's health care in the identified low-performing VA facilities;
2. To evaluate the effectiveness of EBQI in supporting low-performing VA facilities achieve improved:

1. Organizational features (e.g., level of comprehensive services available; care coordination arrangements; PACT features implemented; environment of care improvements);
2. Provider/staff attitudes (e.g., improved gender awareness; women's health knowledge and practice);

d) Quality of care and patient experiences among women Veteran patients using secondary data; and,
3. To evaluate contextual factors, local implementation processes, and organizational changes in the participating facilities over time.

Results of the evaluation have been used to provide feedback to stakeholders, including women Veterans, at the local, network and national levels, while also being used to continuously refine EBQI implementation processes. The evaluation is also helping inform optimal strategies for ongoing improvements in women Veterans' care in the 21 participating VA facilities, other VA facilities and for other improvement initiatives in this and other national program offices.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Comprehensive Care

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Dynamic waitlist control design with a group of 7 VA facilities was randomly allocated to Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) in Year 1 (while 14 VA facilities serving as waitlist controls), the second group of 7 VA facilities was randomly allocated to EBQI in Year 2 (while the 7 remaining VA facilities and the first 7 EBQI sites serving as control), and the final group of 7 VA facilities was randomly allocated to EBQI in Year 3 (while the first 14 EBQI facilities subsequently serving as control). By the end of the three year study period, a total of 21 VA facilities received at least 1 year of EBQI.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI)

EBQI represents a multilevel stakeholder engaged top-down/bottom-up research-clinical partnership approach to systematically improving the design and implementation of local innovations adapted to local contexts. The EBQI contractor will (1) convene facility-level stakeholder meetings, (2) facilitate local facility-level QI team design meetings, (3) provide external practice facilitation through within and across facility QI collaboration calls, (4) provide formative QI data feedback and (5) provide QI training/education to local teams.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Evidence-Based Quality Improvement

Intervention Type OTHER

Multilevel research-clinical partnership approach to supporting local strategic planning, priority setting, skill building and engagement in addressing targeted healthcare delivery problems. Launched at participating VA facilities through advance key stakeholder interviews, in-person site visits, data review (e.g., structure and environment of care, gender disparities in quality and patient experience), QI education/training, technical support (e.g., QI project and measures development), additional formative feedback from the evaluation (e.g., provider/survey measure summaries), external and internal practice facilitation, and across-EBQI site collaboration calls. Local leadership, EBQI champions and QI teams develop and implement innovation projects aimed at improving prioritized quality targets related to women Veterans' health and healthcare needs as well as facility-level structural changes needed to improve compliance with VA guidelines.

Waitlist Controls

Waitlist controls will continue naturalistic routine care implementation of VHA directives and other guidance related to comprehensive women's health care.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Evidence-Based Quality Improvement

Multilevel research-clinical partnership approach to supporting local strategic planning, priority setting, skill building and engagement in addressing targeted healthcare delivery problems. Launched at participating VA facilities through advance key stakeholder interviews, in-person site visits, data review (e.g., structure and environment of care, gender disparities in quality and patient experience), QI education/training, technical support (e.g., QI project and measures development), additional formative feedback from the evaluation (e.g., provider/survey measure summaries), external and internal practice facilitation, and across-EBQI site collaboration calls. Local leadership, EBQI champions and QI teams develop and implement innovation projects aimed at improving prioritized quality targets related to women Veterans' health and healthcare needs as well as facility-level structural changes needed to improve compliance with VA guidelines.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EBQI

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Unit of randomization: VA healthcare facilities (VA medical center or community-based outpatient clinic)
* Subset of VA healthcare facilities identified as low-performing on the basis of composites of access/wait times, gender disparities in quality, e.g.:

* depression screening
* diabetic blood sugar control
* Presence/absence of VA-required structural facets of care, e.g.:

* designated women's health providers
* mammography coordinator
* gynecology access
* Women Veteran Program Manager (WVPM)
* 3:1 staffing ratio for PACT teamlets


* Veteran Integrated Service Network (VISN) level leader (Director or Chief Medical Officer)
* VISN level WVPM Lead, VISN level primary care director, VISN level QI/system redesign lead)
* VA facility leader (Director or other member of senior leadership)
* Chief of Staff
* primary care director
* women's health medical director
* WVPM
* local EBQI champion
* other key personnel


* Primary care providers (medical doctor \[MD\], doctor of osteopathy \[DO\], nurse practitioner \[NP\], physician assistant \[PA\]) delivering primary care in general primary care and/or women's health clinics
* PACT teamlet members (registered nurse \[RN\] care managers, licensed vocational nurse/licensed practical nurse \[LVN/LPN\]/health technicians, and clerks)
* larger PACT team members, e.g.:

* social workers
* dieticians
* health coaches
* integrated mental health

Exclusion Criteria

* Facility-level exclusion: Facilities not identified in the initial sample of VA facilities (sample not renewed over time).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elizabeth M Yano, PhD MSPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA

Alison B Hamilton, PhD MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Central Alabama Veterans Health Care System West Campus, Montgomery, AL

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Northern Arizona VA Health Care System, Prescott, AZ

Prescott, Arizona, United States

Site Status

VA Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA

Sepulveda, California, United States

Site Status

VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Carl Vinson VA Medical Center, Dublin, GA

Dublin, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marion VA Medical Center, Marion, IL

Marion, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Robert J. Dole Department of Veterans Affairs Medical and Regional Office Center, Wichita, KS

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Overton Brooks VA Medical Center, Shreveport, LA

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Rehabilitation R&D Service, Baltimore, MD

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Battle Creek VA Medical Center, Battle Creek, MI

Battle Creek, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Harry S. Truman Memorial, Columbia, MO

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

VA Southern Nevada Healthcare System, North Las Vegas, NV

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Bath VA Medical Center, Bath, NY

Bath, New York, United States

Site Status

Salisbury W.G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center, Salisbury, NC

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Chalmers P. Wylie Ambulatory Care Center, Columbus, OH

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

VA Black Hills Health Care System Fort Meade Campus, Fort Meade, SD

Fort Meade, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio, TX

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Hampton VA Medical Center, Hampton, VA

Hampton, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Jonathan M. Wainwright Memorial VA Medical Center, Walla Walla, WA

Walla Walla, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hamilton AB, Olmos-Ochoa TT, Canelo I, Rose D, Hoggatt KJ, Than C, Yano EM. Dynamic waitlisted design for evaluating a randomized trial of evidence-based quality improvement of comprehensive women's health care implementation in low-performing VA facilities. Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Jun 30;1:59. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00038-0. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32885214 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PEC 16-352

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PEX 16-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.