Goal Oriented Strategy to Preserve Ejection Fraction Trial

NCT ID: NCT03236818

Last Updated: 2017-08-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2017-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this prospective long term feasibility study we examine whether a goal oriented therapeutic strategy that is able to preserve right ventricular function will result in improved clinical outcome in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. We hypothesize that right ventricular function can only be preserved when early and aggressive medical combination therapy not only reduces pulmonary vascular resistance but also pulmonary pressures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale:

The current strategy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)is to improve exercise capacity which can be achieved by decreasing pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and subsequently increasing cardiac output (CO). Despite this load reduction, a substantial proportion of patients show progressive right ventricular (RV) dysfunction leading to clinical worsening and death. A possible explanation is that current therapies show a relatively modest reduction in PVR, leaving mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) unchanged. As a consequence RV work, defined as the product of CO and mPAP increases, contributing to progressive RV dysfunction.

Hypothesis:

A goal oriented therapeutic strategy that is able to preserve RV function will result in improved clinical outcome. RV function can only be preserved when early and aggressive combination therapy not only reduces PVR but also mPAP.

Study questions:

1. Will a goal oriented strategy to preserve/improve RV function, measured by right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) be effective?
2. Does early and aggressive combination therapy result in improved RV function and survival during long term follow-up?
3. Does a strategy to preserve RVEF also translate into improvements of other clinically meaningful parameters?
4. Can RVEF be replaced by more simple measures?
5. Will a goal oriented strategy to improve RVEF also lead to improvement of myocardial performances and coupling of the RV to its load?

Study design and study population:

In this prospective longitudinal feasibility study, thirty newly diagnosed idiopathic or heritable PAH patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II or III will be included. Maintenance/improvement of RVEF will be our primary outcome parameter and therefore cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) will be performed at baseline and at 4, 8 , 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Six-minute walk testing (6MWT), quality of life questionnaires and blood sampling (NT-proBNP) will be performed at similar follow-up intervals. In addition, right heart catheterization (RHC) will be performed at baseline, after 4, 12 and 24 months of follow-up.

NYHA II patients will start with single agent medical treatment whereas patients with NYHA III will start on combination therapy (2 treatments). In case of a stable/improved RVEF during each follow-up measurement (defined as no decrease in RVEF \>3% compared to previous measurement), the treatment strategy will remain unchanged. In case of decreased RVEF \>3%, additional medical therapy will be added. Our hypothesis will prove to be correct when the additional medical treatment result in improved RVEF during the subsequent follow-up measurement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Upfront combination therapy

Combination of an ERA and PDE-5I (Sildenafil, Tadalafil, Bosentan, Macitentan)

Group Type OTHER

ERA and PDE-5I (Sildenafil, Tadalafil, Bosentan, Macitentan)

Intervention Type DRUG

Combination of an ERA and PDE-5I (Sildenafil, Tadalafil, Bosentan, Macitentan)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ERA and PDE-5I (Sildenafil, Tadalafil, Bosentan, Macitentan)

Combination of an ERA and PDE-5I (Sildenafil, Tadalafil, Bosentan, Macitentan)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Idiopathic or heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension
* New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II or III

Exclusion Criteria

* Other causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension (i.e. collagen vascular disease, congenital heart disease, chrono-thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary venous hypertension, left heart failure, hypoxemic lung disease)
* Pulmonary arterial hypertension targeted therapies before study inclusion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

A. Vonk Noordegraaf

Clinical Professor, Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anton Vonk Noordegraaf, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VU University Medical Center, department of pulmonary diseases

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VU University Medical Center, dept Pulmonary diseases

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL41878.029.13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.