Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
47 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-07-18
2018-05-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing the Efficacy of Endoscopic FNA vs FNB in Diagnosing Solid Gastrointestinal Lesions
NCT01698190
EUS-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) With and Without the Use of a Stylet
NCT01316614
Trial of Rapid On-Site Evaluation of Transbronchial Needle Aspirate (TBNA)
NCT00861835
EUS-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) Versus EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) for Diagnosis of Subepithelial Tumors
NCT02943837
Ultrasound-Guided Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Cervical Lymphadenopathies
NCT01384357
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cytologic techniques used for rapid on site interpretation
Diagnostic efficiency of touch imprints of needle core biopsies vs smears of fine needle aspirations during rapid on-site interpretation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Mississippi Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maria F. Gonzalez
Assistant Professor of the department of pathology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maria F Gonzalez, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gupta NJ, Wang HH. Increase of core biopsies in visceral organs--experience at one institution. Diagn Cytopathol. 2011 Nov;39(11):791-5. doi: 10.1002/dc.21456. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
Aisner DL, Sams SB. The role of cytology specimens in molecular testing of solid tumors: techniques, limitations, and opportunities. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012 Jun;40(6):511-24. doi: 10.1002/dc.22820.
Padmanabhan V, Barkan G, and Nayar R. Cytopathology + More | Assessing needle core biopsy adequacy-survey of practices. http://www.captodayonline.com/assessing-needle-core-biopsy-adequacy-survey-practices-516/
Rekhtman N, Kazi S, Yao J, Dogan S, Yannes A, Lin O, Silk M, Silk T, Durack JC. Depletion of Core Needle Biopsy Cellularity and DNA Content as a Result of Vigorous Touch Preparations. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Jul;139(7):907-12. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0392-OA. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
Dogan S, Becker JC, Rekhtman N, Tang LH, Nafa K, Ladanyi M, Klimstra DS. Use of touch imprint cytology as a simple method to enrich tumor cells for molecular analysis. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013 Jul;121(7):354-60. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21292. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
Mangia A, Chiriatti A, Chiarappa P, Incalza MA, Antonaci G, Pilato B, Simone G, Tommasi S, Paradiso A. Touch imprint cytology in tumor tissue banks for the confirmation of neoplastic cellularity and for DNA extraction. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008 Jun;132(6):974-8. doi: 10.5858/2008-132-974-TICITT.
Hahn PF, Eisenberg PJ, Pitman MB, Gazelle GS, Mueller PR. Cytopathologic touch preparations (imprints) from core needle biopsies: accuracy compared with that of fine-needle aspirates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Nov;165(5):1277-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.5.7572518.
Chandan VS, Zimmerman K, Baker P, Scalzetti E, Khurana KK. Usefulness of core roll preparations in immediate assessment of neoplastic lung lesions: comparison to conventional CT scan-guided lung fine-needle aspiration cytology. Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3):739-43. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3.739.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-0076
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.