Efficacy and Safety of the Ophthalmic Solution PRO-087 Versus Systane ® Ultra and Ultra Preservative Free (087LATAMFIV)

NCT ID: NCT03223909

Last Updated: 2019-10-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

326 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-13

Study Completion Date

2018-12-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Efficacy and Safety of the Ophthalmic Solution PRO-087 versus Systane ® Ultra and Systane ® Ultra Preservative Free on the Tear Film Dysfunction Syndrome from Mild to Moderate Clinical trial To evaluate the effectiveness of preservative-free ophthalmic formulation PRO-087 (by Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. de C.V.) to restore the anatomical and physiological characteristics of the ocular surface, as well as its distribution and the characteristics of the mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome compared to Systane ® Ultra and Ultra Systane ® preservative free (by Laboratorios Alcon, S.A. de C.V.).

Controlled, randomized, double-blind, masked clinical study, comparing the safety and efficacy of preservative-free PR0-087 vs Systane Ultra with preservative and Systane Ultra preservative free, in subjects with mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome, for a period of 90 days plus 15 days of remote surveillance, in which one of the three agents will be administered (PR0-087, Systane® Ultra or Systane® Ultra preservative free) with a q.i.d. dosage. in both eyes, with regular follow-up visits (5 overall).

Best-corrected visual acuity Intraocular pressure Ocular surface Anterior segment examination Posterior segment examination Tear film break-up time Schirmer test Corneal epithelization Goblet cells count Adverse events Subjects with a clinical diagnosis of mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome between 18 and 90 years old, without concomitant eye diseases nor requiring different treatments of any of the three interventions in this study They will be randomized in 3 groups where PRO-087, Systane® Ultra o Systane® Ultra preservative free will be administered.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Design Controlled, double-blind, randomized, clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy parameters between a group of subjects with a diagnose of mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome under a regimen of ophthalmic solution lubricant drops PRO-087 versus subject under Systane® Ultra or Systane® Ultra preservative free, with the same diagnosis, with a follow-up of 90 days

MAIN OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the effectiveness of preservative-free ophthalmic formulation PRO-087 (by Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. de C.V.) to restore the anatomical and physiological characteristics of the ocular surface, as well as its distribution and the characteristics of the mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome compared to Systane ® Ultra and Ultra Systane ® preservative free (by Laboratorios Alcon, S.A. de C.V.).

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the safety of the preservative-free ophthalmic formulation PRO-087 (by Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. de C.V.) on the corneal and conjunctival epithelium, intraocular pressure, and structures of anterior and posterior segment in patients with tear film dysfunction syndrome from mild to moderate.

To determine the correlation between improvement of clinical status and perceived improvement of symptoms of each participant in each study group.

To compare the qualitative and quantitative histological status of the ocular surface before and after the pharmacological intervention in each study group to determine the evolution under the intervention of PRO-087.

To evaluate the quantitative rating of tear film production by the Schirmer Test throughout the study.

To qualitatively assess the tear film production by measuring the tear film break-up time stained with fluorescein and cobalt filter.

Blinding:

The double-blind study is a procedure in which the patient and the treating doctor ignore to which intervention group the study patient was assigned. To achieve the blinding of both the drug in research and both comparator drugs, these will be labeled in the same way (masking). Besides the figure of an unblinded pharmacist, who is responsible for the delivery of the medication to the patient, will be added. Blinding codes are protected by an outsider appointed by the study sponsor. The codes are also available in the research center (fully sealed), so that they can be consulted by the investigator in case a subject presents a serious adverse event, prior authorization from the study sponsor; the blinding also continues rigorous during the data analysis and interpretation.

patients with tear film dysfunction, classified as mild to moderate, will be included and randomized into 3 groups; the first being treated with PRO-087 ophthalmic solution, the second with Systane® Ultra ophthalmic solution, and the third with ophthalmic solution Systane® Ultra preservative free.

Pharmacological Intervention

The pharmacological intervention will be the instillation of the ophthalmic solution in the bottom of the conjunctival sac during the waking period, in any of the following study groups:

1. Preservative free PRO-087 ophthalmic solution. Dropper bottle. Multidose 1 drop every 4 hours for 90 days.
2. Systane® Ultra ophthalmic solution. Dropper bottle. Multidose. 1 drop every 4 hours for 90 days.
3. Systane ® Ultra preservative free ophthalmic solution. Single-use vials. 1 drop every 4 hours for 90 days.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dry Eye Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Controlled, double-blind, randomized, clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy parameters between a group of subjects with a diagnose of mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome under a regimen of ophthalmic solution lubricant drops PRO-087 versus subject under Systane® Ultra or Systane® Ultra preservative free, with the same diagnosis, with a follow-up of 90 days.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
The double-blind study is a procedure in which the patient and the treating doctor ignore to which intervention group the study patient was assigned. To achieve the blinding of both the drug in research and both comparator drugs, these will be labeled in the same way (masking). Besides the figure of an unblinded pharmacist, who is responsible for the delivery of the medication to the patient, will be added. Blinding codes are protected by an outsider appointed by the study sponsor. The codes are also available in the research center (fully sealed), so that they can be consulted by the investigator in case a subject presents a serious adverse event, prior authorization from the study sponsor; the blinding also continues rigorous during the data analysis and interpretation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PRO-087 PF

Preservative free (PF) PRO-087 ophthalmic solution. Dropper bottle. Multidose 1 drop every 4 hours for 90 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PRO-087

Intervention Type DRUG

0.1% sodium hyaluronate, free-preservative 0.18% chondroitin sulphate

Systane Ultra

Systane Ultra ophthalmic solution, Dropper bottle, Multidose.

1 drop every 4 hours for 90 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Systane Ultra

Intervention Type DRUG

Is a sterile solution containing polyethylene glycol 400, propylene glycol, hydroxypropyl-guar, sorbitol, aminomethylpropanol, boric acid, potassium chloride, sodium chloride and POLYQUAD® (poly-hydronium chloride) 0.001% as preservative.

Systane Ultra PF

Systane Ultra, preservative free ophthalmic solution, single-use vials.

1 drop every 4 hours for 90 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Systane Ultra Preservative Free

Intervention Type DRUG

Polyethylene Glycol 400 0.4%Lubricant, Propylene Glycol 0.3% Lubricant,

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PRO-087

0.1% sodium hyaluronate, free-preservative 0.18% chondroitin sulphate

Intervention Type DRUG

Systane Ultra

Is a sterile solution containing polyethylene glycol 400, propylene glycol, hydroxypropyl-guar, sorbitol, aminomethylpropanol, boric acid, potassium chloride, sodium chloride and POLYQUAD® (poly-hydronium chloride) 0.001% as preservative.

Intervention Type DRUG

Systane Ultra Preservative Free

Polyethylene Glycol 400 0.4%Lubricant, Propylene Glycol 0.3% Lubricant,

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Chondroitin sulfate sodium hyaluronate polyethylene glycol 400, propylene glycol Polyethylene Glycol 400 0.4%, Propylene Glycol 0.3%

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \>18 to \< 90 years old
* Both sexes
* Mild to moderate tear film dysfunction clinical diagnose
* Mild to moderate clinical stage of the disease

* TBUT \> 5 sec. and \< 10 sec.
* Schirmer: \> 4 mm and \< 14 mm
* OSDI \< 30 points
* Corneal staining \< grade III on the Oxford scale
* Availability to go to each revision when indicated.

Exclusion Criteria

General Criteria

1. Subjects with topical and/or systemic medication or mechanical devices that interfere determinedly on the results of the study (such as topical immunomodulators, punctal plugs, corticosteroids, preservative artificial tears, contact lenses).
2. Subjects (females) with active sexual life that do not use a contraceptive method.
3. Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating
4. Female subjects with a positive urine pregnancy test
5. Positive drug addictions\* (verbal interrogatory)
6. Subjects who have participated on any other research clinical trials on the last 40 days
7. Subjects legal or mentally disabled to give an informed consent for participating on this study
8. Subjects who can't comply with the appointments or with every protocol requirement.

Criteria related with ophthalmic ailments

1. Serious tear film dysfunction syndrome TBUT \< 5 s Schirmer: \< 4 mm OSDI \> 30 pints Corneal staining \> grade III on the Oxford scale
2. Non perforated corneal ulcer
3. Perforated corneal ulcer
4. Autoimmune corneal ulcer
5. Ocular surface scarring diseases
6. Ocular surface or annexes metaplastic lesions
7. Fibro vascular proliferation lesions on the conjunctival and/or corneal surface (i.e.: pterygium)
8. Concomitant chronic inflammatory diseases on any ocular structure
9. Acute or infectious inflammatory disease
10. Corneal disease potentially requiring a treatment during the following 3 months
11. Use of topical or systemic drug products classified as forbidden
12. Ocular surgical procedures 3 months before the protocol inclusion
13. Treatments or procedures indicated on the tear film dysfunction treatment, as punctal silicone plugs.
14. Posterior segment diseases requiring a treatment or threatening the visual prognosis
15. Retinal diseases potentially requiring treatment during the following 3 months
16. History of penetrating keratoplasty.
17. Soft or hard contact lenses use during the last month from inclusion day
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Laboratorios Sophia S.A de C.V.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Leopoldo Baiza, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Laboratorios Sophia S.A de C.V.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fernando Rodriguez Sixtos Higuera

Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SOPH087-0415/IV

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.