Education as an Intervention of Compassion Fatigue

NCT ID: NCT03212417

Last Updated: 2019-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-06

Study Completion Date

2019-07-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact education has on reducing compassion fatigue in Oncology Clinical Research Nurses.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Slatten, Carson, and Carson (2011) describe compassion fatigue as "an occupational hazard for those in the helping professions and is a natural consequence of working with people who have experienced extremely stressful events" (p. 327). Compassion fatigue (CF) is a condition that can affect one's physical, emotional, and social well-being. CF can exist or be misunderstood as burnout, defined as the "inability to cope with job stress, displays symptoms such as emotional exhaustion, and reduced personal and professional accomplishments" (Maslach, Schaufeli, \& Leiter, 2001). The term Secondary Traumatic stress has been used within the literature to describe nurses' exposure to the traumatic situations of patients and is often used interchangeably with compassion fatigue (Beck, 2011; Flarity, Gentry, \& Mesinkoof, 2013), but is contrasted by compassion satisfaction (CS): the pleasure that nurses derive from the ability to perform work well (Stamm, 2009). Slatten et al., (2011) described compassion fatigue as a natural consequence of nursing: therefore, prevention of exposure should not be the focus of any intervention. The Literature review has identified that nurses should be educated about risk factors and coping strategies to combat compassion fatigue.

Neville and Cole (2013) describe incentives for organizations to proactively prevent CF, they explained:

The care patients receive from nurses is one of the most significant predictors of patient satisfaction and is a quality indicator of overall healthcare performance. Research demonstrates that nurses' perception of work environment and patient satisfaction are highly correlated; thus, measures to enhance nurses' ability to deliver excellent care and to thrive in their work environments are of paramount importance to healthcare institutions (p. 349).

Most patients on clinical trials have tried standard of care treatment unsuccessfully. Little is known, due to the lack of research, demonstrating the impact of CF, CS or Burnout on CRNs and BMT Nurses. Both nursing populations' work closely with oncology patients, either during or following participation on a clinical trial, developing a close relationship with the patients and their families. The nurses are at risk for exposure to emotionally disturbing patient outcomes that can be detrimental on psychological health. One-third of the Hematology and Solid Tumor clinical trials at City of Hope National Medical Center are phase 1 trials, which are to determine dose limiting toxicity with the intent of improving patient outcomes. Nurses are providing patient care to individuals with a poor prognosis, after repeat exposure to emotional pain, the CRN and BMT Nurse leave the organization due to intolerance of suffering.

This project is important to teach nurses how to recognize and manage CF. The educational intervention could reduce nurse turnover, increase morale, and improve patient satisfaction, all of which could be a cost savings to the organization.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Normal Volunteer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Interventional trial without phases-supportive care.

This is a feasibility pilot study project assessing the presence of compassion fatigue in clinical research nurses (cohort 1) and bone marrow transplant nurses (cohort 2). A survey will be completed by participants prior to and after an educational presentation. The intervention includes the risk factors, signs and symptoms, and interventions on compassion fatigue. The survey will be completed prior to the education, immediately following the education, one month following the education and two months following the education. A final survey will be implemented for the cohort 2 only. The objective of this concluding analysis is to gather data relative to CF and coping mechanisms.

Group Type OTHER

Educational intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Presentation of risk factors, signs and symptoms, and interventions on compassion fatigue

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Educational intervention

Presentation of risk factors, signs and symptoms, and interventions on compassion fatigue

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Documented written informed consent of participant
* Must be a Clinical Research Nurse working in the Clinical Trials Office or a Bone Marrow Transplant nurse working at COH National Medical Center
* Ability read and speak English, (questionnaires are in English)
* Willingness and ability to complete three ProQol 5 surveys, one demographic survey,and Coping Mechanisms survey (cohort 2).
* Willingness to participate in a 30-minute educational intervention.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

City of Hope Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lynette Svingen, MBA/MHA, RN, BSN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

City of Hope Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

City of Hope Medical Center

Duarte, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17181

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Effect of Mindfulness Meditation
NCT06282913 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA