Serum Serotonin and Pruritus After Intrathecal Morphine in Cesarean Section

NCT ID: NCT03209427

Last Updated: 2017-07-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-02

Study Completion Date

2016-09-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pruritus is the commonest side effect of intrathecal morphine especially in parturient, but the exact mechanism of pruritus is not clear. Many mechanisms have been suggested. Among these mechanisms is the activation of the 5-HT3 receptors by the intrathecally injected morphine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Forty parturients underwent elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were divided into two groups of 20 each in this prospective randomized study. Group I received 100 µg of intrathecal morphine (ITM) mixed with 12 mg of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine (M100) while group II received 200 µg of ITM mixed with 12 mg of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine (M200). Two blood samples were taken from each patient for serotonin estimation, preoperatively and 4 hrs later. Postoperatively all patients were assessed for pruritus (incidence \& severity), visual analog scale (VAS), first request of analgesia, and total analgesic dose required within 24 hrs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pruritus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group I

intrathecal injection of 100 μg morphine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Morphine 100 μg

Intervention Type DRUG

Intrathecal injection of morphine100 μg

Group II

iIntrathecal injection of 200 μg morphine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Morphine 200 μg

Intervention Type DRUG

Intrathecal injection of morphine 200 μg

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Morphine 100 μg

Intrathecal injection of morphine100 μg

Intervention Type DRUG

Morphine 200 μg

Intrathecal injection of morphine 200 μg

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

M100 M200

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I - II term pregnant patients scheduled for elective cesarean section

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with a known allergy to the study drugs
* significant cardiac, respiratory, renal, neurological, or hepatic disease; -coagulation disorders
* BMI \> 30 kg/m2
* any itchy skin diseases.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed galal aly

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohamed G Aly, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assiut university faculty of medicine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bonnet MP, Marret E, Josserand J, Mercier FJ. Effect of prophylactic 5-HT3 receptor antagonists on pruritus induced by neuraxial opioids: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Sep;101(3):311-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen202. Epub 2008 Jul 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18611915 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17100209

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.